(There's a typo in my previous comment; microparticle should read microarticle.)
Anyway, there's something 'bothering' me. I'll tell you here because it's kind of outside the most recent article's comments and so a bit undercover:
Our host hasn't mentioned the Signal 'leak' has he? I did a word search just now of his most recent articles roughly from the date of the leak and there's no mention. He's normally quite thorough, yes? Very specific and detail-oriented? Especially about homeland politics? In fact, he seems to be going out of his way to avoid the M-East. I'm unsure I would even find a peep about Yemen either, which the leak was apparently about-- you know, a political 'leak' occurring right on his homeland? But maybe I'm wrong. So did you come across any mention of it or, say, Yemen (the bombing of)? We know Ukraine/Russia are mentioned all the time by our host, right?
But here's the other part: Did you notice a 'palm' ash cross (What is that? Christian? Lent? Who have been accused, whether true or not, of killing Jesus?) on Rubio's forehead in one of his interviews, maybe a couple of weeks ago or so? I did. How about Musk's odd 'Natzi' salute? Is there some kind of pattern forming? If some things seem oddly out of place, would it be purposefully? Hidden messages in plain sight? What about my previous mention of Patel under a weird glaze in his 'support' for Iz? And why should Gabbard, ex-military of all people, let a leak like that happen? (These questions are almost rhetorical.) Why should she and Trump ostensibly reverse their anti-war stances, specifically WRT Yemen and surrounds?
That's my main point or 'bother'. As you might know, indie journalists or bloggers like to take jabs at legacy media's dead-silences on important issues and yet here it seems that our little indie-media host appears to be doing just that; deafening silence on the elephant in the room.
The current US admin seem to be sending 'signals', ironically including as a leak from an app called, Signal.
Signals? What signals?
Meanwhile, in our host's most recent article, we have this (maybe part of an internal struggle against the Lobby?):
----
"The New York Times published a gigantic piece Sunday detailing how the Pentagon and the CIA actually ran all... tactical operations...
Today, the DOGE team visits the CIA.".
____
I would strongly advise that you don't talk about this, at least just yet or directly, and maybe even keep a copy of this message on your own computer, and for now just keep your eyes, ears and nose open. Let's see what they do and don't do next.
While loose lips can sink ships, they can also keep them afloat. But sometimes it's hard to tell when, how and where. Lots of reflective and refractive waves about.
Yes. I have noticed the silences. Loud and clear. Absolutely. My lips are sealed. It feels like we are literally dealing with reflective and refractive tsunamis these days. I also made an observation about mo not leaving the dandy for another eight years because he said so and nobody really noticed it and it has not been addressed.
I don't understand your second sentence. I can guess about it, but could you offer it in other words?
Incidentally, I've edited my comment (kunstler.com/p/bedlam-pending/comment/104977963) for the sake of emphasis/clarity, so you may wish to consult it again. I also added a couple of linked videos, both which also seem to help clarify things and support the comment.
Oh I see. I'm not certain how to grapple with the topic. For example, the Zelensky agenda is similar to the Netanyahu agenda. So hopefully that helps to provide the elaboration you are seeking into my observation of missing pieces within the puzzle.
~ Isaiah's Unspeakable Pentagon ~
____
(There's a typo in my previous comment; microparticle should read microarticle.)
Anyway, there's something 'bothering' me. I'll tell you here because it's kind of outside the most recent article's comments and so a bit undercover:
Our host hasn't mentioned the Signal 'leak' has he? I did a word search just now of his most recent articles roughly from the date of the leak and there's no mention. He's normally quite thorough, yes? Very specific and detail-oriented? Especially about homeland politics? In fact, he seems to be going out of his way to avoid the M-East. I'm unsure I would even find a peep about Yemen either, which the leak was apparently about-- you know, a political 'leak' occurring right on his homeland? But maybe I'm wrong. So did you come across any mention of it or, say, Yemen (the bombing of)? We know Ukraine/Russia are mentioned all the time by our host, right?
But here's the other part: Did you notice a 'palm' ash cross (What is that? Christian? Lent? Who have been accused, whether true or not, of killing Jesus?) on Rubio's forehead in one of his interviews, maybe a couple of weeks ago or so? I did. How about Musk's odd 'Natzi' salute? Is there some kind of pattern forming? If some things seem oddly out of place, would it be purposefully? Hidden messages in plain sight? What about my previous mention of Patel under a weird glaze in his 'support' for Iz? And why should Gabbard, ex-military of all people, let a leak like that happen? (These questions are almost rhetorical.) Why should she and Trump ostensibly reverse their anti-war stances, specifically WRT Yemen and surrounds?
That's my main point or 'bother'. As you might know, indie journalists or bloggers like to take jabs at legacy media's dead-silences on important issues and yet here it seems that our little indie-media host appears to be doing just that; deafening silence on the elephant in the room.
The current US admin seem to be sending 'signals', ironically including as a leak from an app called, Signal.
Signals? What signals?
Meanwhile, in our host's most recent article, we have this (maybe part of an internal struggle against the Lobby?):
----
"The New York Times published a gigantic piece Sunday detailing how the Pentagon and the CIA actually ran all... tactical operations...
Today, the DOGE team visits the CIA.".
____
I would strongly advise that you don't talk about this, at least just yet or directly, and maybe even keep a copy of this message on your own computer, and for now just keep your eyes, ears and nose open. Let's see what they do and don't do next.
While loose lips can sink ships, they can also keep them afloat. But sometimes it's hard to tell when, how and where. Lots of reflective and refractive waves about.
____
Bonus links:
youtu.be/ed8eW1N4w88?si=zZ7IaNUfG8MmU-4m
youtu.be/O9nTv-sSxjM?si=atJKYKle6XLewrrk
Yes. I have noticed the silences. Loud and clear. Absolutely. My lips are sealed. It feels like we are literally dealing with reflective and refractive tsunamis these days. I also made an observation about mo not leaving the dandy for another eight years because he said so and nobody really noticed it and it has not been addressed.
I don't understand your second sentence. I can guess about it, but could you offer it in other words?
Incidentally, I've edited my comment (kunstler.com/p/bedlam-pending/comment/104977963) for the sake of emphasis/clarity, so you may wish to consult it again. I also added a couple of linked videos, both which also seem to help clarify things and support the comment.
Oh I see. I'm not certain how to grapple with the topic. For example, the Zelensky agenda is similar to the Netanyahu agenda. So hopefully that helps to provide the elaboration you are seeking into my observation of missing pieces within the puzzle.
Oh ok, thanks. I'll have to think more about that tomorrow. I initially suspected you might have meant Trump wanting to stay on for a third term.
Oh I did mean that lol. You mentioned the second sentence specifically so I was addressing that.