“He MAY have ties to the security state (which if he believes in the Constitution might be a good thing)”
Because he would dismantle the security state?! lol
Mark, I’m continuing my tradition of not voting because my last residence in the USA was in California, and my vote would be recorded in Californian—a one-party state run by Comintern. It makes Mos Eisley seem like a place of safety and virtue!
“He MAY have ties to the security state (which if he believes in the Constitution might be a good thing)”
Because he would dismantle the security state?! lol
Mark, I’m continuing my tradition of not voting because my last residence in the USA was in California, and my vote would be recorded in Californian—a one-party state run by Comintern. It makes Mos Eisley seem like a place of safety and virtue!
“He MAY have ties to the security state (which if he believes in the Constitution might be a good thing)”
Because he would dismantle the security state?! lol
Mark, I’m continuing my tradition of not voting because my last residence in the USA was in California, and my vote would be recorded in Californian—a one-party state run by Comintern. It makes Mos Eisley seem like a place of safety and virtue!