10 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Mr. Raven's avatar

His official story is appealing but his ties to the global surveillance company Palenltir which is part of the lawfare against ordinary people blob are appalling.

Expand full comment
Errata in México's avatar

Yes indeed. His rapid rise to power and connection to a surveillance contractor for the DoD—not to mention his flip from being a never-Trumper—give me pause.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

I don’t know, but I understand the early never Trump sentiment. I was part of it. I’m a political junkie and still fell for it.

I read and saw the news coverage when he announced his presidential run and was amazed by the stupid things that he supposedly said. Finally it got so bad that I did some research….. and found that almost everything was misquoted and slanted against him.

I was shocked at the lengths to which they went to make him look bad ,

sometimes even making up stories from whole cloth.

Been a supporter ever since.

Expand full comment
Mr. Raven's avatar

LOL, I am not a never Trumper, just objective, and objectively Vance has unsavory Silicon Valley ties, should I pretend those aren't real, like the woketards pretend biological sex isn't real, because feels?

Expand full comment
Pangolin Chow Mein's avatar

Wait, you think Palantir is a huge red flag?!? 😂

Expand full comment
Errata in México's avatar

But you weren’t elected to the US Senate! Such a one should know the players.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Ok, but can he be any worse than what’s there? He MAY have ties to the security state (which if he believes in the Constitution might be a good thing), but the people running things now are borderline (?) fascist.

Expand full comment
Errata in México's avatar

I have no further comment when you talk about the security state in a positive light.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

You may want to re-read what I wrote. I didn’t say anything positive about it, in fact, I said that its leadership is borderline (?) fascist.

I don’t believe that it was a compliment ….

Expand full comment
Errata in México's avatar

“He MAY have ties to the security state (which if he believes in the Constitution might be a good thing)”

Because he would dismantle the security state?! lol

Mark, I’m continuing my tradition of not voting because my last residence in the USA was in California, and my vote would be recorded in Californian—a one-party state run by Comintern. It makes Mos Eisley seem like a place of safety and virtue!

Expand full comment