There is no precedent the progressives won't break. They don't believe in the nation state, or laws, or tradition. They only know raw power. There are no rules anymore.
When the FF, the politicians of the day, put together the Constitution, it became so watered down with the assignment of power that little was definitely assigned to the elements of government.
The best example is the judiciary, where the SCOTUS is identified, and тАЬany Federal courts as the Congress deems necessaryтАЭ. ThatтАЩs it. What we see today is the accumulated idiocy of generations of Deep Staters. Section one gives just about all the law-making power to the Congress, which due to party ineptitude they have essentially given to the president much of it. Right now, immigration and tariffs are in the hands of the president but the Constitution says the power is in the Congress. The Constitution is a guide and does little in controlling the ability of the politicians to change it when it fits their agenda. It is the responsibility of the SCOTUS, not district judges to stop the politicization of the DC scene and adhere to the Constitution. Uh huh, right!!!!!
Problem is, if Trump sets these precedents, tomorrow the Dems will use them as well. That's how we've gotten progressively more effed in general.
There is no precedent the progressives won't break. They don't believe in the nation state, or laws, or tradition. They only know raw power. There are no rules anymore.
IMHO, Mary.
When the FF, the politicians of the day, put together the Constitution, it became so watered down with the assignment of power that little was definitely assigned to the elements of government.
The best example is the judiciary, where the SCOTUS is identified, and тАЬany Federal courts as the Congress deems necessaryтАЭ. ThatтАЩs it. What we see today is the accumulated idiocy of generations of Deep Staters. Section one gives just about all the law-making power to the Congress, which due to party ineptitude they have essentially given to the president much of it. Right now, immigration and tariffs are in the hands of the president but the Constitution says the power is in the Congress. The Constitution is a guide and does little in controlling the ability of the politicians to change it when it fits their agenda. It is the responsibility of the SCOTUS, not district judges to stop the politicization of the DC scene and adhere to the Constitution. Uh huh, right!!!!!