633 Comments
User's avatar
Raymond R's avatar

When you drain the swamp, you get angry alligators

Expand full comment
TheRealLisa's avatar

Very true. It's making me nervous, though. The alligators got a lot of traction with lawfare previously.

Expand full comment
Reader East of Albuquerque's avatar

I won't link to it, but I happened upon a YT video, apropos of an unrelated search a while ago, in which a worker took a shovel and, as a big fat alligator swam up him, he wacked it smack on the noggin.

Expand full comment
Te Burt's avatar

There are a few who could use a reality check. 2 yr olds throwing temper tantrums.

Expand full comment
Opie the Mick's avatar

Please stop denigrating swamp critters, those dem's in Washington don't even rise to the level of the scum on the bottom of scum's shoes.

Expand full comment
Abbybwood's avatar

Take those particular alligators to the “zoo” and put them behind bars.

Then all the little kiddies can come by gawking and ask, “What are you in for?” Ha, ha.

Expand full comment
Tree Mike's avatar

I'm sure the DC judge doesn't have legal authority to stop Trump and his appointees from doing WHATEVER they want to do within said Executive branch department. So just do it and let said judge enforce his decree. How many unconstitutional troops does he have at his disposal?

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

However, it seems the controlling power in DC is the national-wide network of federal judges. Do you think that is what the FF desired? The Constitution does not give them the power they seem to have.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar
Feb 14Edited

Meanwhile they judge shop for lawfare and juries they can rig.

To be fair both sides do it, but Democrats do it to the point of ridiculousness.

I am laughing at the hysterics of the Democrat party heres to hoping they all have a very rough four years.

Defund the DNC!

Expand full comment
Tree Mike's avatar

I lost track o this thread. The founding fathers warned of this systems weaknesses if the populace was not Godly and moral. Now we're hoping "good" judges, out judge, bad judges. I have no illusions about Trump, but he's the lesser evil I voted for. So far, he's been a pleasant surprize. He learned from the deep state ass whipping he got. "The People" seem to have awakened from the WOKE mind disease. I'm cautiously optimistic. We may not have to shoot our way out of this. THAT would be nice.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

Yeah! Sounds like a bunch of pedophiles...a "nationwide network" of "Federal Judges"! Where'd THEY come from???? (Oh, right..the Constitution...)They're next for the chopping block, huh, JohnAZ?

Expand full comment
Byron Allen Black's avatar

You sound like Stalin. I hear he had a beautiful, pitch-perfect singing voice.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

"I'm sure the DC judge doesn't have legal authority to stop Trump and his appointees from doing WHATEVER they want to do within said Executive branch department."

Oh! You're sure? Good...clearly you're not a constitutional lawyer.

"Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has."

"Article III establishes the judicial branch. The judicial branch interprets the Constitution and laws passed by Congress."

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Maria, read it again. The Constitution does NOT identify the responsibility of judicial review at all and does not call out the function of Federal judges, only allowing their existence per acts of Congress. Judicial Review was started with Marburg vs. Madison and is not supposed to be political as it has evolved into. The only thing judicial review is supposed to do is test the Constitutionality of laws passed by Congress and approved by the president. It has been turned into a political monster, being used almost exclusively by the Left to attempt to make law and modify what Rightist presidents want to do. EOs are a target with Trump and were not so much with Biden. If EOs can be a target, why aren’t by-laws and regulations set up by unelected bureaucrats under judicial review. This is probably the number one success story of the Democrats over the last 70 years.

Expand full comment
Tree Mike's avatar

I lost track of this this thread, sorry about dropping my Notzee duties (FUCK STALIN!). Legal precedent was set at the beginning of the Bribem administration, when left wing judges set precedent that the President has , basically, dictatorial powers over firing and reconstruction the Executive Branch. What was it Lenin said? " You have to break eggs to make an omelette." what goes around, comes around. There's my "Deep Thoughts" for the chat.

All I care about is getting rid of the pedo, Commie, Satanist, Deep State, NWO. mo fos. The rest will sort itself out.

With the recent "Great Awakening", everybody's eyes are going to be on what's going on. Whistle blowers have new found respect. Transparency up the deep state ass!!! (not a sexual innuendo)

Expand full comment
Esther Cook's avatar

Alligator hides make good shoes.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

When you get alligators make boots and BBQ.

Expand full comment
michael hopper's avatar

I noticed one name missing from the list of people no longer having a security clearance, the ketchup lady’s husband, John effing Kerry. Who knows what devious S.O.B. is up to.

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

And Obama!

Expand full comment
Te Burt's avatar

That was my first thought. Why not his, too? Or Clinton's. I can make a l-o-n-g list of people I don't trust with security clearances!

Expand full comment
Barbara costas's avatar

Obama security clearance has been rescinded today.

Expand full comment
Te Burt's avatar

Wow! I have not seen that in my CNN (cyber network news) feeds! Thanks! Made my day!

Expand full comment
Suzie's avatar

Agreed! Once you are no longer in office one should automatically lose their clearance.

If, for some reasons related to National Security come along to make it necessary to “read that person in” on the Intel, than that could be handled strictly on a case by case basis, with distinct and narrow parameters.

Perhaps a law in this regard needs to be passed.

Expand full comment
Esther Cook's avatar

There would be major advantages to pulling security clearances when people leave office. But I would NOT have liked Trump losing his clearance 2021-2025.

Expand full comment
Mark Livingston's avatar

Biden yanked DJT's clearance. For Insurrection™. No Joke©!

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

Yep and the demented old fool who has left secret documents scattered all over had his revoked for cause.

Expand full comment
Miriamnae's avatar

Clinton gave us the blue dress charade while hiding what he and Cankles had actually done: sell our military secrets to China. (Bill Gertz).

Expand full comment
UncleBob9's avatar

Gertz warned us back in the '90s that Clinton was selling us out, but not many listened -- and those of us who did were called "nuts" and told to shut up so we didn't hurt the economy. Thirty years later, and people are finally waking up to the tech that we've had several traitors in the Oval Orifice: FDR, LBJ, Carter, probably the Bushes, definitely Clinton, Obama, and Biden. So what's anybody actually gonna do about it?

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

One very specific thing in fact small tactical nukes.

Expand full comment
Disinfected's avatar

LOL! Let's get our terminology straight. Kerry goes by "a haircut in search of a brain." Unfortunately for Kerry, still no luck on that front.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Has Newsom earned that nickname also?

Expand full comment
wkenn's avatar

Good chance it will be inherited.

Expand full comment
Disinfected's avatar

It would be fitting, no?

Expand full comment
Wilhelm Kaiser's avatar

His cranial cavity is wind tunnel.

Expand full comment
William Wallace's avatar

Sounds like the roof racks on your car at 65 MPH!

Expand full comment
Yirgach's avatar

Linda Li (former DNC fund raiser now turned conservative) has revealed that after the CNN debate debacle Hunter Biden was the local puppet master for "Joe Biden", sat in on all the WH meetings and filtered the news for his dad.

Oh yeah, and he never had a security clearance either. I bet BO was a bit jealous.

Expand full comment
Miriamnae's avatar

Or BO sat him there.

Expand full comment
Abbybwood's avatar

BO, with his headset permanently attached to his brain, is but just one speed dial away.

“Hey Boss?”

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

The list is endless.

Expand full comment
Jeff Keener's avatar

If USAID were private enterprise, it would be subject to RICO prosecution.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

I suspect there is no proviso against it being used against Government agencies as well.

Expand full comment
Jeff Keener's avatar

Good question that should be examined by DOJ.

Expand full comment
NothingButNet's avatar

Excellent post, JK! Seems like we are witnessing the DC equivalent of the pulling back of the curtain in the Wizard of Oz, revealing the sputtering and incompetent boobs behind the DC curtain. Unfortunately for those DC miscreants, the entire world is watching as their corruption and grift is exposed and the normal people of the US are disgusted 🤮. Elon Musk is the perfect person to orchestrate the defenestration of the DC mob - he has no dog in the hunt as he’s rich beyond comprehension and seems to be indifferent as to politics. Trump can simply stand back and watch the 💩 show play out as Musk absorbs the media criticism and Trump takes credit for the success of DOGE.

While it’s yet to be determined just how much grift and inefficiency will be eliminated, it is clear that this will be the most successful attempt at reduction/restructuring of the federal government we’ve ever seen. Get your popcorn 🍿 ready for Musk’s review of the bigger targets such as DoD.

Expand full comment
Poolside at the Decline's avatar

"pulling back of the curtain in the Wizard of Oz"

-----------

"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater." ~Frank Zappa

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Indifferent to politics but not to profits. I assume the Plan to bring in millions of Indians is still in the offing.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

What plan?

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Wow. Everyone was taking about it a few short weeks ago. But since you didn't like any questioning about your heroes, you never took really took it in. Now it has been completely deleted from your memory files.

To jog your memory or a place to start googling: Why was Vivek thrown under the bus. This is a perfect opportunity for you to learn something about yourself.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

What I heard was a Man frustrated at what has become obvious in this country, we have changed from a national with a wonderful education system that covered needs for all the people, to a national that spends more per student and is #40 of 40 developed nations on tests. The Deep State has just about succeeded in turning us into a national that spends of know-nothing lemmings. When Vivek looked around, he stated the obvious, there are not enough “smart” people here to man the high tech revolution that everyone is expecting. He paid for it. That does not mean it is not the truth.

WE are becoming a nation of burger flippers, wait staffs, BS artists disguised as salesmen and marketeers, health care workers that burn out in five years, all to satisfy the Godhead of the Left, Obama.

Here’s is a good question for you. If we are becoming that desired service sector economy, why do we need college educated people? We supposedly educate all these “smart” people, for what? SO companies and corporations can bring smart people in from other countries to fill the unfilled jobs? Like MDs? When is the last time you went to a physician that was not named Patel or the like? So why isn’t American producing MDs at a required rate? Are we, as a nation, that dumb? And why? Look no farther than our illustrious government in DC. Like anything else, you want something to work properly, keep it the heck away from our government.

Destroy the DOE if you want future generations to have a chance.

One more. Even then, there is a spectrum of talent, intelligence and ability in any society, on this I agree with you. Our illustrious Deep State has forgotten this very basic fact as they have chased just about every manufacturing job out of the US. So if you hate computers, high tech, or AI and have no desire to work with them, you are effed in the future. Personally, when I lost my manufacturing engineering job to China in the 90s, I moved to Nursing. Luckily for me as 90% of my engineering co-workers never got their job back. I thrived for 17 years. They didn’t.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

You clearly have zero understanding of what the DoE actually does, ArizonaBoy...it does not set curricula - that is done at the State level. DoE only ensures that the disadvantaged have SOME hope of getting a foothold in the education system.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Since the DOE has Ben in DC, the achievement scores have declined in 4th and 8th grades. My daughter is a fourth grade teacher and the cirriculum she aches explains why. The idiot education administrations need to do a class on child development as they ignore the stages of mental development totally. I have been involved in tutoring two generations of kids and have seen the lapse of the learning of math. The biggest deal IMHO, is the denial of the importance of Math facts and the memorization of basic arithmetic. Reading and writing have the same problems. Look at yourself, name-calling to express yourself. The last four years of DEI have just made things worse as tests still are going down and the idiocy of the Covid shutdowns supported by the head of NEA have created a three year period of pupils falling behind. These kids are handicapped for a lifetime because of the foibles of the DOE. Also, the disadvantaged have not improved any more than the rest of the kids.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Teaches

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

You changed the subject. Why? Ask yourself.

Lucky for you that they didn't get their jobs back? Wow, that's dark. I just learned something about you.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Lugh, you are so full of shit. What to you is dark is light for most. I would never gauge myself against your darkness. Ever.

Why was Vivek thrown under the bus? I just answered and as usual you didn’t get it.

And yeah, by changing careers to one that had demand instead of moving overseas, I thrived. Luckily for me AS 90% who didn’t change course ended up in lower class jobs.

You are so sick sometimes.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

mentally ill is the word.

Expand full comment
Jeff Keener's avatar

Money quote: "It is the President’s duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed, meaning that the departments under him do their jobs correctly, which would give him inherent authority to audit and restructure agencies like USAID."

Judge Engelmayer bases his injunction on 5 U.S. Code § 551, the section of Title 5 that defines certain words. The judge never states which word and its definition that he feels is pivotal. This is like Judge Merchan's unstated "other crime" in the Bragg prosecution.

Engelmayer does the same thing when he makes a blanket statement that DOGE is unconstitutional. He never states which part of the U.S. Constitution is relevant to his opinion.

Useless!

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

"was a grown man dressed-up like an eight-year-old hollering nursery rhymes in front of a flash-mob"

Jim, you took the words right out of my mouth. I didn't watch the Super Bowl this year. First time since the last time the 49ers won (1994) I think that I had no interest. I was sick of the Kansas City Chiefs and the Taylor Swift montages every time they get a first down. The Philadelphia Eagles are just an ugly team. Ugly uniforms. Ugly colors. Ugly fans. Ugly stadium. Ugly coach. Don't know why anyone would want to be a fan of that team. Anyway, I digress. I gave up watching Super Bowl half time shows since the Janet Jackson accidental nipple exposure incident. One thing I have noticed is that out of all the "performers" they could have at a Super Bowl half time show it is seems to me that they always choose black rappers. All these idiots and all their dancers do is stand up there and rattle off inane poetry that none can understand and then gyrate around while thrusting their hips back and forth. It isn't entertainment. It isn't talent. I don't know what they hell it is. I'd take a marching band over this bullshit any day + Sunday.

But hey, what do I know. People like Jelly Roll (a fat 400 pound slob) or Post Malone (a skinny tatted up slob) are now famous. Gone are the days where the pretty people wowed the audience with their looks and talents. Gone are the bands like Def Leppard, Van Halen and Bon Jovi where they actually played their music and sang the lyrics without auto tune. Today popular entertainers are rappers and tatted up white guys who do everything in their power to make themselves look as nightmarish and disgusting as possible. And people like this!

Expand full comment
Liber8or's avatar

They showed Taylor Swift on the Superbowl Jumbotron, and the crowd started booing. The look on Taylor's face was priceless.

Expand full comment
Disinfected's avatar

LOL! Poor little girl. Life's going to be hard for her once the spotlight turns elsewhere.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

But for the Orange Devil, they roared. The USA is back in the biggest possible way. We're going to storm the beaches off the Persian gulf. Countless Americans will die, heroes every last one of them. Nothing better than dead heroes, eh?

Expand full comment
Bailey's avatar

Lugh, there is treatment for that TDS now. By the way, with USAID going dark, are you sending out resumes?

Expand full comment
rd3's avatar

How many millions died for the bankers in the 20th century? My grandfather took a piece of shrapnel through the arm, got frostbite on his legs and feet, and had a building collapse on top of him in France to serve the bankers. He was too proud even to apply for a purple heart because he he didn't want to look like a pansy in comparison to all of his friends who died.

Expand full comment
OTOH/IMHO's avatar

Great respect for that man, in an era where they chose to be known as "citizen-soldiers," rather than "warfighters," which is every other word out of the mouth of Peter Hegseth, who looks programmed to help stage-manage war both in the Mideast and in the Pacific. It was a 2-time Medal of Honor Winner who saw the light and wrote an epic book, War is a Racket(free on line at Gutenberg and a must-read.) But does Trump, who is inclined to make peace with anyone who will host a Trump hotel, casino or golf course, plan to rein in vastly wasteful military spending? He waved a finger at Boeing first time he ran and then meekly bowed to their billion-dollar refit of Airforce One and every other massive weapons appropriation set on his desk. A man who promised to balance the budget, and then signed off on- not once vetoed- 4 consecutive TRILLION dollar deficits. But he did hang Andrew Jackson's portrait- a man who did in fact balance 8 straight and leave the nation $0.00 in debt when he left office, in the Oval Office.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

I take it you're running in 2028? Gonna show us how it's done?

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Thanks for the reminder of why the last Stupor Bowl I ever saw was sometime in the mid-1990s. It sounds not only unwatchable, but an absolute insult to anyone with an ounce of intelligence. Not to mention that the halftime shows are basically homages to postmodernist utopia (aka luciferianism, satanism). Yep, you all get to be part of a satanic ritual when you partake. I'm glad my instincts told me to stay away all those years ago.

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

I'm a slow learner but my interest in American football is waning. Between the constant penalties, the Taylor Swift spots, the wokery, the bad play and the constant barrage of ads involving multi-racial couples and blacks, a 3 hours football game is almost unbearable.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

At this point, it sounds like it's already torture - so why is your interest merely "waning?" My God, what would it take?

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

Ha, good question. I guess waning wasn't the appropriate term. I don't watch football anymore except for 49ers games. I grew up loving the San Francisco 49ers. As a child Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, Roger Craig, Ronnie Lott were my sports heroes and at the time the 49ers were good. Very good. It's just something that I have always enjoyed and wanted to be a part of and it is hard to let something that was once so beloved slip by the wayside. That is changing, though, because the product just isn't as good as it used to be. Really, the only football that interests me anymore is a game involving the 49ers, if they are good. Otherwise I have pretty much turned off the NFL.

It was painful for me that the whole kneeling during the anthem originated with the 49ers and that idiot Kaepernick.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

This season of the NFL really stunk. Every interesting team did not even make the playoffs and the games are cookie-cutter boring. I can't watch any sport without a rooting interest.

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

It did stink. All the teams that I thought would make an interesting Super Bowl didn't make it. Detroit - never been before, what a story that would have been. Houston - never been before, what a story that would have been. Washington - haven't been to a Super Bowl since 1991. Buffalo - haven't been to a Super Bowl since 1995 and have never won one.

Instead we get KC who has been in 5 of the last 6 and Philadelphia, a hideously ugly team that only those in Philly can love and who was in it two years ago. Bleck. Boring. Boring. Boring. And, voila, the game stunk.

The NFL created salary caps to prevent dynasties. Since the advent of the salary caps we have had the New England Patriots and now we have the Kansas City Chiefs. The rest of the teams all suck and can't figure it out.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 11
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

Nothing against multi-racial couples, Don. My only issue is that that is all they portray on television as if the majority of American couples are multi-racial. That is not the case. Yes, it happens often but it is not the majority. People tend to pair off with those of similar racial ethnicity. Everything that is shown on television is an outright lie. From the happy beer drinking ads to the suburban white housewife coupled up with the black man with dread locks. All ads do is lie and present a false reality that does not exist.

Just by watching an hour of television ads one, who didn't know better, would deduce that America is a black nation and that white people are vast minority.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar
Feb 11Edited

Until that little white girl down the street sees these adds and buys into them only to get knocked up and her credit cards run all the way up.

The ghetto way five girlfriends all knocked up credit cards maxed and on to the next.

One of my daughters' friends has dove deep into the mud life she just found out her boyfriend of three years has two other ladies on the side both knocked up.

How did she finally decipher it?

She didn't my daughter started looking around some facebook group and saw one of the baby mommas posting Jamals picture.

This is standard fare for the ghetto rap culture.

The worst part about it this beautiful girl went to school for a skill and he made her quit her job to work at Starbucks.

Why? He is such a dirty cheater he just knew she would get scammed on by other guys.

He is Jealous as fuck, tells her she can't hang out with her friends when he is not around and basically controls all aspects of her life.

Instead of dumping him she figured now he was all hers.

Side note to the story her mom also has a black boyfriend who knocked up her son's wife and now has a black grandson fathered by her boyfriend.

This is not the latest scripted episode of Gerry Springer I am literally seeing this play out in real life with several of my daughters friends.

Lives ruined, credit scores destroyed and stuck with some kid the fathers don't care about.

I know three girls living this nightmare right now and one of them stuck her own father with her two unwanted black kids while she is out drinking, smoking weed and sniffing meth. The father of these two babies JUST got out of jail for shaking at least one of these two babies so bad he will have lifetime issues.

My buddy is a good man I would have got this bastard shanked while he was in prison. I almost went to visit this sick bastard so I could loudly say his two babies he abused are doing great without him in their life.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

So, you're just saying that there are scumbag young men out there - so what's new? It was ever thus...no, wait! You're actually pointing at them being black, as if no white boy would EVER be an asshole as bad as THESE black assholes. Got it, you racist piece of shit.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar
Feb 14Edited

Oh no Maria called me a racist...

This was an expansion on ghetto culture and where it intersects with my life personally.

When I see some dirty little white boy knocking up two women and dating a third at the same time while ringing up all their credit cards, I will call them out as well. I have yet to see one act like this in 58 years of life but I am sure they exist somewhere.

Is what it is and the terms racist, Zionist, anti-Semite AND Fascist have lost all meaning.

FYI

I have three black cousins and a black aunt and NONE of them behave like this.

None of the black people I work with act like this.

Expand full comment
Mark Gan's avatar

Horrible

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

I believe they call it "jungle fever." Yes, it is an illness of the mind.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

The Black ethos in the deep cities is not the same as White American, or any other American ethnic group. The Family unit is NOT paramount in the Black world. That fact is used on the national attack on the core family. Men have little allegiance to a singular woman especially where kids are involved.

Not every Black group, but enough. The result? Women on welfare and men in gangs.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

That's the whole point.

Expand full comment
OTOH/IMHO's avatar

Bid was doing its best to look manly, though (no more Bud-Light-in-the Loafers ads.)

Expand full comment
UncleBob9's avatar

The hip-hop crap at the Super Bowl is a result of Roger Goodell, The Senator's Son, hiring billionaire drug kingpin and "recording artist" Jay-Z Carter to run events for the NFL in a half-assed attempt to buy off radical black activists. I don't think it's working.

Expand full comment
kev's avatar

Useful idiots yesterday: "I'm not worried about government surveillance, I have nothing to hide." Useful idiots today: "The government has no right to this private information."

Expand full comment
Captain Pompano's avatar

The death throes of the corrupt and the grifters playing out right before our eyes.

Expand full comment
Owain Glyndŵr's avatar

I prefer the FAFO approach.

Expand full comment
Long Term View's avatar

Well - self identifying fraudsters and grifters will be those NGP's that receive funds during the time lawsuit was filed and the supreme court hears it. Trump should say simply, I am not following these orders and freeze any NGO payments.

Expand full comment
Hugh Wayne Black's avatar

Why not? Biden explicitly defied SCOTUS even AFTER they ruled his student loan bailouts were unconstitutional. DOGE to Dems: “How do you like me now?”

Expand full comment
Te Burt's avatar

I thought he did exactly that.

Expand full comment
wkenn's avatar

“The actual objective by the plaintiff in these cases (the Party of Chaos) is simply to delay any corrective action.”

Precisely.

Expand full comment
Richard White's avatar

I am no lawyer, but I believe that Secretary Bessent can safely ignore the court's orders. In any event, employees of the Treasury Department report to the Secretary and not the judge, and they take their orders from him.

It would be amusing of the attorneys for the President were to show up in court not to make an argument against the lawsuit, but simply to inform the judge that the matter that the AGs have brought pertain to policy and personnel, and that is not in the purview of the courts, who may concern themselves only with law. Remind the judge of this and walk out.

Expand full comment
Palo's avatar

Someone in my family's full time job is to submit proposals for a fortune 500 company to try and win government grants (mostly to DOE, DOD, and DARPA). She is very skilled at this high paying job and has a support team of engineers, accountants, lawyers, etc. that work to put together these proposals to meet the guidelines that the Government Department outlines. There are still hundreds of billions of not yet allocated funds from Build Back Better & inflation reduction act.

This person now realizes they could lose their job but acknowledges that the majority of this funding is waste due to a myriad of reasons. Virtually all Biden admin grants have DEI requirements, they are encouraged to partner with certain NGO's and contractors that will get part of the funding (politicians friends and families), and they have to operate the project within a very bureaucratic framework of reporting, meeting deadlines, reporting, etc.

Overall, the biggest obstacle she runs into is that her company can have a hard time justifying the cost share for these politically targeted projects. Usually the proposals require a cost share of 10-20% and her company can't justify outlaying their own millions as the project's often are pie in the sky or have so much bureaucratic waste that they don't even expect to recover their 10-20% investment on woke government dictated projects.

I told her she should go work for DOGE as she knows the system inside & out.

Expand full comment
Matthew McWilliams's avatar

In general, these grants are not intended to produce tangible, useful results. Rather, they are intended to funnel money to favored NGOs and individuals. Perhaps your family member's employer can glean some benefit from the project, but that is purely coincidental.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Money for nuthin, chicks for free.

Expand full comment
Teresa Parmenter's avatar

Great essay. Yes indeed, FAFO!

Expand full comment
Howard Skillington's avatar

These issues raise fundamental questions about the division of powers among our three branches of government and, clearly, it’s long past due for the Supreme Court to reestablish where those divisions lie.

On the one hand, we CFN-types understandably wish for Mr. Trump to ride roughshod over all of the agencies and institutions that have brought this nation to its present existential crisis. On the other, those who wish for an Imperial Presidency with unlimited powers of disruption would do well to remember that the next president may be another Obama, eager to effectively use those powers against us.

I have long regarded Strict Constructionism of the Constitution as being as silly as the notion of Biblical Inerrancy but, in the present circumstance, it may be that we should hope for the Supreme Court to embrace the arrangement originally put in place by the Founding Fathers, and hope that still provides the president with the powers he needs to clean things up.

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

Congress was intended to make the laws, including, the details of such laws. However, Congress has pissed away much of its authority, sending it to the bureaucracies of the Executive Branch. Today Congress passes vague laws and then pass the responsibility on to the Bureaucrats to enforce. Here's an example. Let's say Congress wants to pass a law to require bakeries to make tasty chocolate bagels. They bicker and argue and come up with a vague law that says every bakery shall now produce tasty chocolate bagels. However, what they don't put in that new law are the details of that tasty chocolate bagel. How long should it take to make that chocolate bagel? What kind of chocolate should be used? How much sugar? Should those bagels be whole wheat or white flour? What baking temperature should they bake them at? How many chocolate bagels does each bakery need to produce in a week? No, what they do is produce a vague law. This then results in the Presidency putting together a Department of Bagelry tasked with making sure bakeries are making tasty chocolate bagels. The Department of Bagelry now sets the standards and the requirements because the Congress was too damned lazy to do its job. Thus we have runaway, rogue agencies doing whatever the hell they want because Congress won't do its job.

My point? Separation of powers are important. We need them. But first, we need a Congress that is willing to do its fucking job and right now all we have are idiots populating the halls of Congress.

Expand full comment
Howard Skillington's avatar

I quite agree. Please provide us with a simple, reliable procedure for replacing the crooked, impotent idiots we now have in Congress with wise able statesmen.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Stop letting most people vote. And ban all campaign contributions.

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

Spot on.

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

Howard,

Return to secret ballots in Congressional and Senate votes. Allow our lawgivers to vote their conscious, not necessarily the party line or that of their paymasters on K street.

Expand full comment
UncleBob9's avatar

For over 100 years we've been told we need "experts" running things. Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and especially the incorrigibly evil son of a preacher, Thomas Woodrow Wilson believed that civil service and government should be run by experts and geniuses because average people are corrupt morons who have trouble putting their coffee in a cup. Wilson, a racist whose goal with education was "to make a man as unlike his father as possible," openly said the Constitution needed to be gotten rid of because it didn't fit with his (and Edward Mandel House's) plans to create an administrative state in which it wouldn't matter who was elected because bureaucrats would run everything. That has been one of the biggest goals of the Democrats and Establishment Republicans ever since. They've pretty much achieved their goals: Senators and Representatives seldom do anything of lasting import, unless you count endless blathering on tv important. On the rare occasions actual reformers or statesmen have arrived on the scene, they've been marginalized, assassinated, or assimilated into the Blob. Subversives like Obama are sold to us as reforming statesmen, and the public buys the argument because of their voices, appearance, and alliance with propagandists who call themselves "journalists"; these would-be guarantors of freedom only speak of imperial presidents when someone like Reagan or Trump comes on the scene and threatens the status quo by not following the Establishment's program to the letter.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

It's too late. The greed of the special interests perverts all conversations. The Republic is over, and the Emperor has appeared.

Expand full comment
Byron Allen Black's avatar

Ever since I read "We who are about to die, salute you" as a teenager, I've been studying the steady decline of Rome and how our failing Republic is tracking it.

I am also quite aware that the situation is distinct, from top to bottom, but even so the parallels are eerie,

Your comment about an "Emperor" inspired this reaction.

Trump = Nero

Cackler = Elagabalus

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

IMHO, the Constitution has the same job as the Bible, to define a structure that defies evil, the spread of immorality. Both ID the evil and give suggestions on how to fend it off.

Expand full comment
Howard Skillington's avatar

Of course, and that's why I have juxtaposed them. Both were worthy attempts, in their day, to provide guidance and a moral framework, and both have glaring defects that are unhelpful in today's world. Give up the notion of Inerrancy, and every verse in the Bible is opened to debate; stray from Strict Constructionism and the slippery slope could lead to a new constitutional convention and the dissolution of the union.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

In that case, don't even bother opening it. We have ministers and priests in favor of gay marriage and worse. That's where you approach gets us. Tradition must be the guide to interpretation.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Leviticus 18 sets God’s limits on unlawful sexual relations. As this passage is the basis for what God considers sin, it should be the basis for all those ministers, pastors, rabbis and priests should be sermonizing and counseling. Read the passage and you will realize how immoral this country has become.

Expand full comment
Wilhelm Kaiser's avatar

In today's society, "moral framework" seems to be the great unknown.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Some people want a living constitution. I like mine safely dead - Anthony Scalia, found dead with a pillow on his face. Some posters here believe he just liked to sleep that way. There is no end to human stupidity and cupidity.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

The federal budget is $6 trillion. USAid's budget is $80 billion. So this is all a show.

Expand full comment
Palo's avatar

not exactly. 80 billion divided by 342 million Americans is $230 each person. Thats almost $1k for my 4-person household. Obviously DOGE started with USAID to get public support because it is mostly fraud & grift.

A billion here, a billion there, all of a sudden its real money.

Expand full comment
RickyRitardo's avatar

Divide $80 Billion by number of taxpayers. 112 million. $714 per taxpayer. That's $1428 just for my wife and myself. Or the $150 billion in that stupid Ukraine war. Me and the wife are into that debacle for almost $2700.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

By that simplistically shitty arithmetic, you're saying that you are also paying $8,035 each, so $16,070 - of your taxes go towards the defense budget ($900b divided by 112 million).

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

And HUNDREDS OF $ BILLIONS MISSING in Ukraine according to Zelensky.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Z and Putin need to listen to each other first. Z needs to defend Ukraine’s right for existence but listen to Putin’s insistence to protect its border from a crusading NATO. The last group they should both be looking to is the USA.

Hmmm. Th current wish lists have Trump wanting North America aligned as an economic entity under sole control of DC, Putin wants Ukraine’s border as a DMZ, maybe all of Ukraine, Xi wants Taiwan, Bibi wants the West Bank and Gaza. Who is right and who is wrong. Is the world being pushed into localized alignments geo-politically? IMHO, absolutely. But look at history, it has been going on for a long time. The cave men with the biggest clubs wins.

Expand full comment
Abbybwood's avatar

Putin is a lawyer and he is right.

Zelenskyy’s term ended in May of ‘24. He is illegitimate.

They need new elections in 3 months then the U.S. and Putin can deal with the new president. And it will NOT be Zelenskyy.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

LOL@ pots & kettles.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Maybe Trump is greasing the skids for the tete-a-tete that is needed? Should Ukraine be Russia’s 51st state?

Expand full comment
Te Burt's avatar

If several in Congress and a few bankers were audited, I bet we'd find that missing $$.

Expand full comment
Tony Lauria's avatar

According to Catherine Austin Fitts and Dr. Mark Skidmore of Michigan State University, $21 trillion went to DOD and its black projects to build a Breakaway Civilization. We ain't never gonna see that money again.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

Yep - and the grift will have been entirely bi-partisan

Expand full comment
Abbybwood's avatar

That audit should cause a riot.

Zelenskyy will have no place to hide, not even Miami.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

If there's billions of $$$ missing, it probably never made it out of the USA.

Expand full comment
Te Burt's avatar

And he hasn't even gotten to DOD! Failed 7 audits? With that much missing money, I better be seeing some flying saucers and anti-gravity technology coming out of it!

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

a tiny fragment of the federal taxes I pay...and the issues are not being discussed. This is just arson, not serious efficiency and savings. How are they going to tackle a trillion dollars in medicaid costs? My father is getting a wheelchair from the government that costs more than my decked-out Subaru.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

The problem is not folks that need medical help, it is the ones that do not.

Expand full comment
RickyRitardo's avatar

Medicare/ Medicaid fraud levels are unbelievable. I had a tenant who received Medicare disability because he was a drunk. He would only work off the books so as not to lose any bennies. A check every month, free med. insurance, and a housing stipend. He was very handy and could easily support himself. Another guy I know gets paid to take care of his "disabled " Mother. She takes care of herself. He gets a steady paycheck and she pays for the food and apartment on our dime. There are millions out there doing the same thing.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

Did they get the jab? I'm looking on the bright side here =D

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

So, a case of fraud or two, even, plus a whole heap you'll never hear about. However, and this is the scary bit for me - for you (and so many self-righteous assholes like you) this is sufficient reason for you to see ALL those who receive MedicAid to LOSE everything? Asshole! Clean up the fraud, for sure, but don't take a worthy recipient off the service. Callous assholes, thinking saving a few bucks is more important than saving lives.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Most people can do without a $30,000 wheelchair. And it's funny, for all the US spends on the military, they don't seem to do much — for people; for the people who support them. We have 1.3 million active duty personnel. What exactly are they doing all day?

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Agreed, the military is a sinkhole for capital. They have not even been able to do an audit in the Biden years.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

I can only speak for the NAVY and Marines.

They show up to work around 6:00 am have quarters and then work all day till they get sent home most of the time around 3:00pm.

Underway they work 12 hour shifts plus stand watches and still get to fight a war or two.

You should join up and see what it's all about I assure you most of them work far harder than you ever have.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

They could have protected our borders all these years. They didn't. Our Department of Defense was only a Department of Offense. Trump finally changed that. Armed men on the borders again. One promise kept anyway.

Expand full comment
rd3's avatar

It used to be called The Department of War. Then, they Orwelled the name.

Expand full comment
UncleBob9's avatar

They combined War with the Navy after WW2 and called it Defense.

Expand full comment
rd3's avatar

Yes. They Orwelled the name.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

They could have but where not allowed to.

Not allowed to by whom is the next question!

Why anyone that wants to flood the US with third world mutts of unknown origin for various reasons.

Most of them have Democrat somewhere in their title but a few might have Republican and they all should be rotting in a federal super max busting big rocks into little ones.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

yes, it's now the Department of Peace and Tranquility, located in a building the shape of which evokes the goddess.

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Ben. 3rd world mutt invasion is part of the NWO. That’s global. Migration on this scale is are civilization altering events. Behind all of it is genocide. And Demicide. Including replacing indigenous with mutts. Degrade all of us to workers limited to C40 cities. (C for carbon and climate). Those who survive that is. Plans have been around centuries. Nothing personal.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Yes, the Kalergi Plan, backed and financed by the Tribe.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

As always screwy lugh has to bring it back to them pesky Jews.

You know the people that are barely holding on to one country by the skin of their teeth.

Seems rather odd the most powerful group of people on the planet can't flick a third world caveman society like the Palestinians like a booger.

Yeah, the Jewish boogeyman have gone down in all of history as the conquerors of all nations with vast empires to show for all their hard work.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

But it is all very personal.

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Personal depends on who has the power, right ? Lol.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

That accounts for 22% of the massive budget. If we could just have AI run everything, we wouldn't need soldiers and could save $198 billion a year. Easy...Elon is probably planning (or plotting) this right now.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Been there, done that.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

1967, NTC San Diego was the start.

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Ooooh yeah. And add the heat on the hanger deck and flight deck in the South China Sea. Of course throw in the most unbelievable sunrises and sunsets and it’s heaven on earth. Lol. CVA(N)65. Late 60’s.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

My brother in the U.S. Army said they would spend their days polishing the insides of engines with brake fluid.

Expand full comment
Bailey's avatar

You don't have to accept anything from the govt. Give the pricey wheelchair back. You can buy a power chair privately for $4k, or used for $1500.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Stateism is a big problem.

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Eric. I have a friend late 40's nearby who dove into too shallow water 16 years ago. High break, 6'4" former BB player. Quadrapelegic. In process for his 3rd wheelchair. Operated by mouth only. Called a 'sip and puff'. Swedish manufacturer but assembled in Nashville TN. Requires 5 months of Medicare / Insurance serious paperwork. $65 k.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

I think the same thing happened to Charles Krauthammer. I remember him talking in sync with his breathing tube.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Ted Nugent took guys like this hunting. The Nuge is the greatest.

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Yes he does. Ted does alot under the radar.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Well, would you say he needs it? I would say so...

Expand full comment
RickyRitardo's avatar

How does a 65 K wheelchair only last a 7-8 years? We're getting supremely ripped-off on that deal. Kick ass tracked off-road job is 20 grand. Does "sip and puff" tech really add $45 K to the price?

https://actiontrackchair.com/models/action-trackchair-axis/

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Actually 5-6 years. It’s a Swedish PERMOBILE. Has 2 elec motors. Headlights. Taillights. iPhone usable. Dashboard to see chair functions. Friend takes himself to his med appointments on sidewalks. Chair weighs 550lbs plus body of 165 lbs. New tires every 7-8 mos. Factory service checkups 3x a year. New anti compression-sore seat pads. $2000. Entire home smart with ALEXA voice control for HVAC. TV’s. Lighting. Etc. Also service dog.

It’s a pricey maintenance ticket. Also uses his accessible van for longer trips and bad weather. He’s been alive quite long for a quad.

Expand full comment
Yirgach's avatar

The next step up are the care bots. Home health care by robot coming to your neighborhood soon (for some folks anyway).

Tesla and others are already building them funded by ARPA/DOD.

Put them in every home and in a pinch, instant armed militia, similar to Switzerland. Just remember to back it up before sending into battle.

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Somehow I don’t think this man will go care bots. His Mother does his bowel program. And his nurse do all the rest. Very personal.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

Batteries they are really expensive and have lots of electronics that wears out.

Only 65k?

Is more like it.

To put it bluntly going to Dennys for a bad breakfast and coffee with tip is almost $30 dollars.

That was $10 -$12 a decade ago.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

Life really does suck, doesn't it Ben? Jeez. I remember when a cup of joe cost a nickel...but I was only earning $25 a week.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

No life doesn't suck.

Life is great.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Why not armored chairs that can fire missiles based on puff and sip or direct thought? The first cyber-warriors. Help these guys back in the game so they can attain Valhalla.

Expand full comment
RickyRitardo's avatar

That $30,000 wheelchair will certainly outlive the patient. It should last for decades. It's not like it will rust out like a Subaru. It should serve well for many people over the years. Change out the wear parts and pass it on. My trucks are both over 25 years old and I don't exactly baby them.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

Its a computer on wheels with batteries think again.

Expand full comment
RickyRitardo's avatar

"Its a computer on wheels with batteries think again." Probably not as smart as an $800 iPhone with a couple $300 Li-ion batteries. If the government wasn't buying them the price would be a fraction of what it is. Explain to me how "electronics" wear out. They have no moving parts. Unless they are poorly manufactured their service life is indefinite. Heating cooling cycles can cause problems due to expansion/ contraction. as can vibration during movement but if designed and built right they should never fail. I have a 1971 Mercedes with electronic fuel injection and electronic ignition and it still runs fine after 51 years with the brain box under the hood in summer heat and winter cold all while bouncing down the road. It's a German control unit of course (bosch). Nothing's been replaced since '91 when I got it.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

Electronic components wear out over time.

I also believe very strongly that anything manufactured in China is now using recycled electronic parts.

Capacitor dielectrics leak, cpu's overheat, microcircuits break down most of all I doubt it is hardened for use and the banging around causes problems with the solder runs.

Nothing is made to last and yes since Government is involved it will be ten times as expensive as it should be.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

As usual, incorrect information being toss around...firstly, the appropriations for USAID was $40b (very Trumpian to double the figure), and of that a large chunk goes to US farmers to purchase surplus produce for overseas aid. The first to notice this Muskrat-fucking will be US farmers

Expand full comment
kev's avatar

A journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step.

Expand full comment
Paul B, Cohen's avatar

What you fail to see, the critical point, is that the cost extracted on society by the evil being exposed is tremendously expensive and destructive.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

So damn what! We ignore the bastards because someone might get hurt? The Deep State’s is a good ol’ boys (and girls) club that needs to be destroyed and broken into pieces. Protection of the American people is an ageless propaganda tool by the Left. We will protect the people from all those badees out there. However, once elected, we will do absolutely nothing. Heh, the people are catching on, hence Trump.

Expand full comment
Paul B, Cohen's avatar

Cost extracted by the evil of USAID scams, John. I think you misunderstood and are administering some friendly fire.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

You will have to convince me you have some basis for me to believe you know what you're talking about. How exactly do you know this stuff?

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Eric, just look around. “Protection of the American People” and a few foreigners, has put the US government $36 trillion in debt. It has also resulted in a government that cannot even tell its public what it has spent, because then it would lose power to the people.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Right...add up the wars since 1990 plus the National Security State since 1990 and esp 2001, and subtract all the massive corporate entities that pay less in taxes than I do.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

You don't believe that them military has a mandate to protect us? Or you just don't like the mandate or the United States or nations in general? You have to establish your pov before you demand credential from others.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

I didn't ask for credentials. I asked for a solid argument. The military's mandate to protect us...against what? There are already 1.2 million police officers

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

The police keep civil order. The military must defend against invasions from without. That they were forbidden from so doing was treason. The Border Guard was not sufficient and is out gunned by the Cartels if it comes to that.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Oh, like on 9/11...got you.

Expand full comment
Gracchus's avatar

So you're arguing that Usurper Biden, by steadfastly refusing as Commander in Chief to defend the US border, was committing treason?

What do you suppose was the reason he did that? Did China and/or EU and/or shady NGOs pay him off? Compromat?

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Yes, probably. The statement that the Biden Mob was the most criminal in USA history is accurate , iMO.

Expand full comment
William O's avatar

Or perhaps a beginning?

Expand full comment
Hoffmeister's avatar

Pass the popcorn, here's hoping they make it a continuing series

Expand full comment
Rob Anderson's avatar

It’s not just the money, which is a relatively modest amount. It’s the nefarious purposes the money was used for.

As another commenter mentioned, DOGE feels like a RICO investigation.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

Well I am dead against giving money to Politico and Reuters. I am not saying this was all good use of money. I am not in favor of most of it and it's not why I pay taxes. My concern is that this is all a big ball of theatrical smoke and lights and that no real change will happen. My concern is with the media spectacle this is getting, and how people think that some progress is really happening.

Elon Musk? Please.

Expand full comment
Annette kimball's avatar

We may have to be patient and not anticipate that POTUS is going to cheat us out of hanging those bastards who fleeced this entire country ! He pays taxes also!

Expand full comment
Deana's avatar

Hmm. Could your doubt be attributed to the fact that you run a non-profit?

"Our mission is to provide real-life training of writers, broadcasters, editors, researchers and producers. Listeners and readers get the results as our finished work."

You seem to be the only person that works and runs your non-profit. Nice grift.

The abuse of the he 501(c)(3) is all over the place.

Expand full comment
Eric F Coppolino's avatar

You're funny. We've probably already met; I'm not going to bother to check.

Abuse and grift? I'm not the Red Cross.

Chiron Return has no payroll; the people who help out are all volunteers and we just cover basic costs; our 990 is filed by postcard. For that, we have done some of the most impressive journalism of the covid-era, created the only primary source chronology, and I put out a fantastic radio show.

We receive no funds from anyone other than our direct human personal donors, many of whom I talk to and who have read my work for years. I cover many costs personally.

And I have taught journalism to hundreds of people and much of my work is related to digital literacy.

So, no.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

The greatest Welfare Queen is Musk...and guess which agencies are being shuttered? So far, every on of them was in the process of investigating some complaint against his companies. Can't have THAT, can we? If you fire all the cops, there is no crime!

Expand full comment
Gracchus's avatar

That's their official budget. It's an intel operation - you really believe that's their entire budget?

Also, look at the media propagandist class wailing and rending their clothes at the thought of USAID's programs be stopped - or worse, exposed to sunlight. The wicked judges issuing desperate, transparently baseless rulings to protect them. This suggests USAID has been paying off American media and institutional players, just the same as they do overseas.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

So, you advise doing nothing and starting nowhere?

I believe that is what got us here in the first place.

Where does one start?

Put a giant map on the wall with federal agencies scrawled on it and throw a dart.

Expand full comment
AT's avatar

Damn right it's a show. It's a show that the left is nothing but a criminal grift racket supported by fake news and fake charity. Now go look for a job sucka since you won't be getting your gov-mint check this month.

Expand full comment