Jim's fearless - he would have published anyhow. He'll never self-censor - the thought of self-censoring wouldn't even enter his mind. When any of us self-censor, their work is done.
Jim's fearless - he would have published anyhow. He'll never self-censor - the thought of self-censoring wouldn't even enter his mind. When any of us self-censor, their work is done.
Not my point. I mean, someone would have shut down this substack. They did manage (finally) to hack his site and take that down. Or he probably would have been shamed publicly, etc. if one of the wokies found his article. Not that Jim would self-censor.
Jim's fearless - he would have published anyhow. He'll never self-censor - the thought of self-censoring wouldn't even enter his mind. When any of us self-censor, their work is done.
Not my point. I mean, someone would have shut down this substack. They did manage (finally) to hack his site and take that down. Or he probably would have been shamed publicly, etc. if one of the wokies found his article. Not that Jim would self-censor.
NOT GUILTY!!
"A work of art which inspires us comes from no quibbling or uncertain man."