First 2 comments (not mine) under Part 2 apparently about it:
"@oojai
4 months ago
@33 minutes into this discussion- after more than two hours of presentation and q&a we have an 'honorary member' effectively suggesting the censorship of this discussion. To further Jim’s point - scientific progress moves ahead one funeral at a time."
First 2 comments (not mine) under Part 2 apparently about it:
"@oojai
4 months ago
@33 minutes into this discussion- after more than two hours of presentation and q&a we have an 'honorary member' effectively suggesting the censorship of this discussion. To further Jim’s point - scientific progress moves ahead one funeral at a time."
---
"@tonka5
4 months ago
Anitra Thorhaug sounds like a censorship coach."
---
And a first comment for the hell of it from under Part 2:
---
"@Mac-ku3xu
3 months ago
Thanks for warning us about Jim's habit of challenging authority - I wouldn't want to be exposed to any independent thought that hasn't been pre-approved by govt censors for my own safety."
First 2 comments (not mine) under Part 2 apparently about it:
"@oojai
4 months ago
@33 minutes into this discussion- after more than two hours of presentation and q&a we have an 'honorary member' effectively suggesting the censorship of this discussion. To further Jim’s point - scientific progress moves ahead one funeral at a time."
---
"@tonka5
4 months ago
Anitra Thorhaug sounds like a censorship coach."
---
And a first comment for the hell of it from under Part 2:
---
"@Mac-ku3xu
3 months ago
Thanks for warning us about Jim's habit of challenging authority - I wouldn't want to be exposed to any independent thought that hasn't been pre-approved by govt censors for my own safety."