Average people - even psychotic ones - don't generally commit terrorist acts. In fact, until the late 1960s, there really were no mass shootings to speak of, and of course no "terrorist attacks" (complete with manifestos, conveniently provided). What explains all of this is the CIA's agenda, from the post-war times until now. Which is wh…
Average people - even psychotic ones - don't generally commit terrorist acts. In fact, until the late 1960s, there really were no mass shootings to speak of, and of course no "terrorist attacks" (complete with manifestos, conveniently provided). What explains all of this is the CIA's agenda, from the post-war times until now. Which is why I ignore all terrorist attacks and just hope I'm never in the line of fire. The Woke Jacobins will constantly blame the availability of guns and the need for support for the insane, as if one can predict what an insane person will do at any given time (hello, Minority Report!).
It's unconscionable what the lettered agencies have been up to and what they have managed to do in order to maintain control by terror and fear. I don't want to go too much into it, but I think most here are familiar with MKUltra brainwashing (the movie "Manchurian Candidate" was a good one for predictive programming, indeed). If not, Wikipedia has an entry on it - because the CIA wants you to believe that they did a whoopsie, and they won't do it again. This isn't true. There are many levels of it. They used the same tactics on the public at large during the covid19 scam.
In any case, years ago when I was first reading in-depth about MKUltra and its uses (two popular examples are Ted Kazinsky (Unibomber) and Ted Bundy), I discovered that at any given time there are 30K (approximately) MKUltra victims just in the US ready to "go off" - and they are programmed and deployed by handlers. There is no need for the PTB to worry about whether one of these MKUltra human weapons are caught or killed. If they aren't killed, no one listens to anything they say, anyway, so there's no danger to the programmers.
This explains why so many of the official stories behind these terrorist acts fold under the least bit of scrutiny, and why if you do dig beneath the official story, you'll be labeled as a paranoid tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
The CIA also coined that term as I think most here also know.
Regular people - even those pushed to the brink - don't tend to commit these kinds of acts. Sure, they might murder someone in a fit of pique when drunk, etc. But even that's rare if you look at the stats. No, it takes a particularly screwed up mind in order to commit one of these attacks, and I can almost guarantee it that they have some connection to mind control of some sort.
That the attacks have also rise in in sync with the internet also gives us a clue. Really easy to program people electronically rather than in person.
Tulsa race riots? Seriously? 🫤. It wasn’t a massacre and everyone over the age of 50 knows that. The MSM started calling it that to serve their idiotic woke racist mantra about 10 years ago. Prior to that is was known as a riot. Pure and simple. Two groups of people who didn’t care much for each other started shooting in a little town called Tulsa in Indian Territory otherwise known as Oklahoma.
Yes, seriously. I am well aware of the oft rewritten "history" regarding the carnage in Tulsa, 1921. It was cited as a counter to the, "terrorism never happened before I was born" refrain. I could have mentioned Vlad the Impaler or maybe the infamous Irgun and Lehi groups.
The truth is that mass murder [by one or many] is older than history itself. Only the means [and the reporting] have changed with the times.... And, one side will record it as the ultimate sacrifice while the other as a most heinous act. We all know who [re]writes the history.
“The truth is that mass murder [by one or many] is older than history itself. Only the means [and the reporting] have changed with the times.... And, one side will record it as the ultimate sacrifice while the other as a most heinous act. We all know who [re]writes the history. “On that I can agree. And 5 people in a family is killed and now it’s a massacre. It’s all relative
Average people - even psychotic ones - don't generally commit terrorist acts. In fact, until the late 1960s, there really were no mass shootings to speak of, and of course no "terrorist attacks" (complete with manifestos, conveniently provided). What explains all of this is the CIA's agenda, from the post-war times until now. Which is why I ignore all terrorist attacks and just hope I'm never in the line of fire. The Woke Jacobins will constantly blame the availability of guns and the need for support for the insane, as if one can predict what an insane person will do at any given time (hello, Minority Report!).
It's unconscionable what the lettered agencies have been up to and what they have managed to do in order to maintain control by terror and fear. I don't want to go too much into it, but I think most here are familiar with MKUltra brainwashing (the movie "Manchurian Candidate" was a good one for predictive programming, indeed). If not, Wikipedia has an entry on it - because the CIA wants you to believe that they did a whoopsie, and they won't do it again. This isn't true. There are many levels of it. They used the same tactics on the public at large during the covid19 scam.
In any case, years ago when I was first reading in-depth about MKUltra and its uses (two popular examples are Ted Kazinsky (Unibomber) and Ted Bundy), I discovered that at any given time there are 30K (approximately) MKUltra victims just in the US ready to "go off" - and they are programmed and deployed by handlers. There is no need for the PTB to worry about whether one of these MKUltra human weapons are caught or killed. If they aren't killed, no one listens to anything they say, anyway, so there's no danger to the programmers.
This explains why so many of the official stories behind these terrorist acts fold under the least bit of scrutiny, and why if you do dig beneath the official story, you'll be labeled as a paranoid tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
The CIA also coined that term as I think most here also know.
Regular people - even those pushed to the brink - don't tend to commit these kinds of acts. Sure, they might murder someone in a fit of pique when drunk, etc. But even that's rare if you look at the stats. No, it takes a particularly screwed up mind in order to commit one of these attacks, and I can almost guarantee it that they have some connection to mind control of some sort.
That the attacks have also rise in in sync with the internet also gives us a clue. Really easy to program people electronically rather than in person.
I've suspected that the kid who shot Trump may have had a handler, but have no evidence.
He probably did. He was seen in a Blackrock commercial a few years before the shooting. That's a bit too much coinkydink for me.
Is this MaryQueen from JHK's old site?
The Woke are mind controlled, aren't they?
Social engineering
100%
"Average people - even psychotic ones - don't generally commit terrorist acts. ...In fact, until the late 1960s ... no "terrorist attacks" ..."
Read more:
https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/40692
How many mass shootings and terrorist attacks were there in the United States before 1966?
Here's a couple that come to mind:
Tulsa Race Riots 1921
Bath School Bombing 1927
While the source sux... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_the_United_States
Tulsa race riots? Seriously? 🫤. It wasn’t a massacre and everyone over the age of 50 knows that. The MSM started calling it that to serve their idiotic woke racist mantra about 10 years ago. Prior to that is was known as a riot. Pure and simple. Two groups of people who didn’t care much for each other started shooting in a little town called Tulsa in Indian Territory otherwise known as Oklahoma.
Yes, seriously. I am well aware of the oft rewritten "history" regarding the carnage in Tulsa, 1921. It was cited as a counter to the, "terrorism never happened before I was born" refrain. I could have mentioned Vlad the Impaler or maybe the infamous Irgun and Lehi groups.
The truth is that mass murder [by one or many] is older than history itself. Only the means [and the reporting] have changed with the times.... And, one side will record it as the ultimate sacrifice while the other as a most heinous act. We all know who [re]writes the history.
“The truth is that mass murder [by one or many] is older than history itself. Only the means [and the reporting] have changed with the times.... And, one side will record it as the ultimate sacrifice while the other as a most heinous act. We all know who [re]writes the history. “On that I can agree. And 5 people in a family is killed and now it’s a massacre. It’s all relative
OK so 2, within 7 years.
Not 1 a month.
Like now.