56 Comments
User's avatar
â­  Return to thread
Robert's avatar

Greetings,

The Biden presidency opens up a can of worms. If he is unfit to run as president; unfit to stand trial for taking and storing classified materials in his garage, how can he be fit enough to issue pardons to people who have not been charged with a crime? You can't have it both ways.

In the past, a disgruntled Pharoh might attempt to eradicate the memory of a previous Pharoh by having his name scratched off of any carving carrying that name. If Biden can be shown to be an illegitimate dementia patient then his doings can be undone to include having a useless DEI hire appointed to the Supreme Court. Brown is an embarrassment and must go.

Apart from all of that, we have drones, orbs, a chemical fog, and what I suspect will be a wave of terror all to continue to look forward to. Interesting times, indeed.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

And if he is "unfit", so can any future president be deemed "unfit". There's always a willing alternative medical opinion out there. Slippery slope.

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

Even Helen Keller would have been able to judge Obiden as incompetent shortly after his taking office, long before the pardons began. Unfortunately, he was not stopped from day one.

Expand full comment
The Keys's avatar

That’s exactly why he wasn’t stopped. They needed him for the pardons.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

2016, the Democrat machine was saying the same thing about Trump.

Expand full comment
ezinmn's avatar

But Trump aced his cognitive exam. Joe Biden? He wouldn't dare set himself up for this.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Hardy fucking har har, you can't be serious.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

Every mother who has sought a medical exemption for a vaccine injured child knows that another doctor can say "meh, no" to that diagnosis. 🤷

With the right incentive ("that's a nice medical license you've got there, sure wouldn't want trouble keeping it"), a corruptible doctor could cave.

The talk of removal coz "unfit" has been extraordinary, hasn't it?

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Any mother of a vaccine injured child, who sought an exemption, but caved when denied that exemption, has absolutely no business being a mother - a mother's first priority is to protect her children at all costs.

Look at the wildlife outside your window there in Idaho. Watch female bears with cubs protect their young. Ever wonder where the nickname "Mama Bear" comes from? To describe a fearless mother protecting her children.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

Actually, a smart mother skips the medical exemption and goes straight to the religious exemption. Our bodies are sacred. But that's not really my point. It's been exceptionally rare to talk about "removing" a president because he was "unfit". I don't disagree with Biden's degree of "unfit-ness". But the whole discussion starts us down a slippery slope. I am just encouraging you to be a bit more curious and creative about how the discussion could backfire in the future.

Expand full comment
Susan Ness's avatar

I simply filled out their health cards myself. knowing they were never actually looked at. Of course, that was more than 30 years ago. I suppose it's all managed by computer these days.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

Electronic health/medical records may make this difficult. In the early 2000s, many medical schools/teaching hospitals were moved from funding per bed to an elaborate grant ("bench to bedside"), requiring all manner of coercion at all levels of government, "public-private partnerships", participation from any drug/biotech company in the state, and... an electronic health/medical system to be established at least in that teaching hospital _system_. If those systems are actually integrated, it could be difficult to say "meh, we're current on our vaxxes".

Expand full comment
cbeard's avatar

Two words. Common Sense. Anyone with a normal IQ can see that Biden suffers from dementia, and at the stage he is at now, I would bet that within a year or a little more, it will be painfully obvious. (it is already obvious to most people) He will be completely incoherent, probably immobile and unable to feed, dress, or take care of himself in any way. Anyone who has/had anything to do with getting/keeping him in office is guilty of treason and should be punished accordingly. ALL of them.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Jen - your point is well-taken. Our conversation probably would have evolved to this point, had Mary not gotten into her box-wine so early on a Friday morning, and offered her unsolicited opinion.

Expand full comment
astera's avatar

Who's Mary?

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Is this condescending attitude serving you well?

It doesn't seem to be.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

It's not an attitude, Mary, it's a character trait. Line up 100 people, and my sons are not in the 81 out of 100 that got the kill shot. I take my responsibility as a father seriously. Not up in here, pumpkin.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Take a flying leap, sparky.

You're not special.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Yes, I am, I rode the short bus to school. Lighten the fuck up.

Expand full comment
The Keys's avatar

Hang on a second Ron. I think you’re missing an important point. It appears that in Ron’s world, rolling up your life and moving to another place to protect one’s child is an entirely manageable and rational choice. Surely, it is not too hard to comprehend that that choice doesn’t exist for everyone? For some women, especially those without means, that choice becomes irresponsible. Leaving a job, nearby family and support, an affordable place to live? You’re suggesting those foundations can be easily tossed aside?

Some Mamma Bears are doing right by their children by living within the parameters of their reality. The choices you refer to are a luxury to many.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Sorry my friend, in my world, rolling the dice with my children's lives - under any circumstances - isn't even a thought. I'd eat dirt and live in a tent, if it meant my children's lives. Had a high school football coach who was famous for saying, "Excuses are for losers." True dat.

How would you like to be a parent who lost a child to the kill shot - your decision - for whatever reason. Might lose your job, might lose your family, might lose your apartment? Please.

In my world - the real world, not the hypothetical - there are many parents out there, who have lost children to the kill shot, whether you believe it or not. Don't even try to imagine living with that decision.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

You sound like an impotent man who can't get a woman to listen to him at home, so he goes to comments sections online and starts bossing females.

What a loser.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

You've got no target at home? JFC, I wonder why.

Expand full comment
astera's avatar

"The female of the species is deadlier than the male." ~ Rudyard Kipling

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

"Any mother of a vaccine injured child, who sought an exemption, but caved when denied that exemption, has absolutely no business being a mother"

Ron, I would not be so judgmental. Millions of people of lesser means than we were coerced by threats that would mean nothing to you or I.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

E - I always appreciate your comments and opinions, but I'm not sure I follow you. The way I see it - just me - is that no matter the relative sacrifice or relative coercion, a mother protects her child - at all costs.

A mother bear fears no tourist, no bison, no male bear, nor a 30-06, 180-grain, in defending her cubs - a threat is a threat.

"Sorry honey, the man denied our exemption request, roll up your sleeve." This surely isn't what you're saying, is it? Please say no. Tell me I've misunderstood you.

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

No, Ron,

What I am suggesting is that a person, single mother perhaps, working two jobs and not able to afford a babysitter, is being told that her child cannot attend school, or cannot ride a school bus, etc. without a shot which, at the time, might not have been recognized as deleterious, would be a difficult decision. There are many people who did not have another choice. The shot or quit one of my jobs and go on welfare? Move out of our efficiency apartment to one on the other side of the tracks? Section 8 with Jamal as a neighbor?

This issue could be almost existential.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

OK, I see what you're saying. Actually, I had a personal experience - similar.

A friend of mine, 54 years old, a nurse, beautiful, vibrant girl, living with her aunt, giving her aunt end-of-life care. At nights, she worked 3rd shift at the County Jail, treating prisoners.

In order to keep her job, she was forced to take the kill shot. She's no longer with us, died in 2022 - turbo-breast cancer, diagnosed at Stage 4, eight weeks later, she was gone. No history of cancer in her family.

So, yeah, she had a choice - hindsight (from heaven even) is 20/20- but she might make a different choice now. RIP Elizabeth Anne Borgman, I love you.

Just one of my friends gone, family too. I will not let these fuckers rest. Ever.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

I agree with you Ron. We must not let pfuckers like Pfauci rest, ever.

We must all PUBLICLY call for their supremely well-justified hangings every day:

https://patrick.net/post/1377537/2022-11-03-everyone-who-imposed-toxxine-mandates

It is literally the only way to get their attention and protect ourselves from future mass murder by injection, barring a lot more people like Luigi Mangione making it known that they have less than zero faith in our "justice" system.

Expand full comment
Old Gyrene's avatar

Damn.

Could have gone all day without reading that.

I look forward to the day those responsible for this are rendered harmless.

Blessings on Elizabeth Anne Borgman.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Thank you.

https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/elizabeth-ann-borgman-obituary?id=38671448

Who knows how many good years she had left, 10, 20, 30? Maybe only a day, life is fickle. The ones you love, hold them close.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

E - it is existential - that's my point.

Expand full comment
Jen's avatar

Or worse, move to a different state. Possibly without family nearby for support. The number of states reducing even religious exemptions is sadly growing.

Expand full comment
Ben's avatar

Consider exposure to truthiness.

How many people had zero clue these shots were not what they were being told.

I have seen some really good people still believing some really fucked up stuff because they had never been exposed to anything but mainstream narratives and bullshit.

Expand full comment
Tim Pallies's avatar

And it's not like you'd need to look to far to find a corruptible doctor.

Expand full comment
CC's avatar

Seems like Biden is doing nothing. He has a very ambitious staff and wife!!!

Expand full comment
William Voelz's avatar

Well Robert JB CAN have it both ways. He personally is NOT crafting any of those pardon letters and making those arrangements. He does not have to. All he needs to do is execute his signature. Even he can do that part. And to your point, who or what is a Katanji anyway ??? LOL.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Happy New Year, Nickel, nice to see you back.

Expand full comment
Neal John Jagger's avatar

You'll dismiss Brown and keep Thomas? Basic grammar is not a requirement of the court?

Expand full comment