"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
No. Actually, "extraordinary" claims must clear the same evidentiary hurdles as "ordinary" claims. No more, no less. Can it be proven? Yes or no?
("Oh no Honey, this is Small Claims Court. You hafta take that on up ta Extraordinary Claims Court. Down da hall 'n' upstairs.")
Just because…
Just because Carl Sagan said it doesn't make it right. Nor does quoting smart people make the quoter look smart (except maybe to the quoter).
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
No. Actually, "extraordinary" claims must clear the same evidentiary hurdles as "ordinary" claims. No more, no less. Can it be proven? Yes or no?
("Oh no Honey, this is Small Claims Court. You hafta take that on up ta Extraordinary Claims Court. Down da hall 'n' upstairs.")
Just because Carl Sagan said it doesn't make it right. Nor does quoting smart people make the quoter look smart (except maybe to the quoter).