9 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Cankerpuss's avatar

Advertising revenue is way down for these "news" agencies because few there be that watch this trip anymore. So who's keeping them afloat? Soros? Bezos? Someone is still giving these poor saps money so they can continue to air their worthless drivel.

Expand full comment
ezinmn's avatar

The pharmaceutical industry controls the media. They don't make a profit on their MSM ad spend, but they control what can and cannot be said. Considered money well spent. Probably working in cahoots with Dominion and Smartmatic, since discussion of election theft is strictly prohibited.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Good, Ez. Banking, Media, Pharma, Food - same people.

Expand full comment
Miriamnae's avatar

Yes. They тАШsuedтАЩ FOX News and Fox folded.

Expand full comment
Ben_r's avatar

No Rupert Murdoch chose not to fight it.

There is a difference and guess who Rupert hates with a purple passion...If you guessed orangeman bad you would be correct.

Willing to loose a billion to hurt Trump who would assess that as being worth it?

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

12/02/24: My guess is the Pentagon/Defense Department/CIA/FBI/DHS/"Seventeen" intelligence agencies. And why not? They are never honestly financially audited, so why not spend the money wherever they happened to feel like it on any given day? And the quotes around "seventeen" means that there could easily be another 17 agencies in existence, so secretive that they have no public names.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Their friends in banking create money out of nothing. Same group controls both industries. So don't you worry about them. They can get interest free "loans" which never have to be paid back.

Expand full comment
Cankerpuss's avatar

So true. What a system eh?

Expand full comment
wkenn's avatar

Agree, how long do they continue watching their $ circle the drain before disabling the toilet.

Expand full comment