33 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
IDissent's avatar

How will anyone be held accountable when the jurors in DC are as malignant as the blob itself?

Expand full comment
Miriamnae's avatar

BREAKING—Per Anne Vandersteele: Trump just signed transition paperwork with Biden with the huge exception that his team will not be using government funding, nor tax payers’ money. It is entirely private funding and he owes no one anything. The transition team has gone dark. Way to go.

Expand full comment
OTOH/IMHO's avatar

Private funding means greased palms, Miriamne.

Expand full comment
bob browning's avatar

No one will, even Hunter. But it's fun imagining there is justice in our "representative" Republic. We peons will take what they give us and be glad we're not denizens in Bangaladesh.

Expand full comment
James Howard Kunstler's avatar

DOJ can apply to change venue. Many of these crimes were also committed in other federal court districts as well as DC.

Expand full comment
Gym+Fritz's avatar

And who is it they apply to? Until we address the fact that, if you are on trial for anything related in any to politics in DC, the jury you get will have voted 90% for, or against, your political party. Look at what happened to “special prosecutions”.

Expand full comment
ezinmn's avatar

The plan is to have a few federal cases originate out of the state of Florida

Expand full comment
random mover's avatar

I'm pretty sure Congress can change the boundaries of federal court districts. But you probably couldn't do it in this session with the ridiculously small margin the GOP has in the House. Then of course you have some GOP Senators who are really Democrats (or Uniparty Corruptocrats) like Senator Murkowski.

Expand full comment
Thurston Thistlethwaite III's avatar

Is there a way for these court cases to be military tribunals? I have zero faith in the civilian courts to get anything meaningful done.

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

Far better to bring back RENDITIONS to off-shore water-boarding facilities, no?

Expand full comment
Steve (recovering lawyer)'s avatar

Sadly, I am compelled to agree. It's nice to fantasize about the restoration of "justice, for all" but I suspect that will remain merely a phrase in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

I've watched Trump for 45 yrs; if he says he will do something, he does it. Always. He never wanted to be president but knew that if no one else came forward he would probably have to do it to get America straightened out and crooks rounded up. He said that 40 yrs ago. And then he became president - he did what he said he would do. He has also said he would round up every deep state person. He has been doing that as well. While we have some deep state folks in military there are also military members who want America restored to goodness and they are working with Trump to do that. Trump put U.S. under martial law on Jan. 6, 2021, just before Biden took office, because America had been taken over by criminals and because Biden was an illegitimate president - meaning we were under occupation. Being under martial law means he could also prosecute deep state criminals under military law and give them tribunals. This has been happening since Jan. 6, 2021. Gitmo got so full they had to use other military prisons around the world but they also got so full they are now doing tribunals on military ships at sea. This has been confirmed by military officers, I've seen videos of all this and this was also confirmed by Monkey Werx, a military veteran on you Toob. This has also been confirmed by Derek Johnson, another military veteran, who explains all this here:

thedocuments.info

Look up Law of War because that is what we are under right now, it is what the military operates under and what we are now under. Trump didn't make public announcement because he didn't want public to panic and also because he didn't want to alert deep state - it was best if they thought they really were in control, all while criminals were being quietly rounded up. If this all sounds crazy and unbelievable, just look at how insane deep state is and know that it takes extraordinary measures to beat them at their own game. Trump does EVERYTHING legally, always has. He has set up traps to entrap deep state criminals quietly. I've researched govt for 30 yrs, every single day for several hours at least and have watched Trump for 45 yrs - he is the real deal. My dad was an admiral who taught me how military works and he also was a top advisor to a past president. I saw what happened to him, deep state tried to ruin him but couldn't because he was a very honest man. I have an idea how deep state works. Most of the criminals have now been rounded up, only minions are left. They have been replaced by actors wearing masks created by CIA, so deep state doesn't panic.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

He didn't "lock her up."

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

She went to Gitmo in 2017.

Expand full comment
Breck's avatar

What?! You'd better quit those mushrooms and ayahuasca.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Sure, Jan.

Expand full comment
robert berger's avatar

This is because there was zero evidence for her to be "locked up " in the first place .

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Her illegal email server containing classified documents wasn't a crime?

Her failure to disclose the fact that she authorized her campaign to fund, create and disemenate the Steele dossier to the Federal Election Commission wasn't a crime?

The whole Clinton Foundation pay-for-pay scheme wasn't a crime?

And those are just off the top of my head. I'm sure that I can dig up many others where anyone else committing the exact same acts would be in a federal prison......

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Thank you. I would also add Clinton Foundation being used for child sex trafficking as well. If you're reading this and doubt it, look it up. They have a HUGE operation in Haiti.

Expand full comment
Ben_r's avatar

Don't forget taking a hammer to federally owned blackberry phones while in the middle of being investigated.

If we had done any of this we would have been thrown in jail but not hildabeast of the huge cankles clinton.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Woke Jacobin alert!

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

He promised to sue Hillary. He didn't. You made an absolute claim which even one example disproves - although I'm sure there are many more.

Expand full comment
Breck's avatar

No he promised to JAIL her.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Thank you. I never heard, then again, why would they tell us? How did it turn out?

Expand full comment
OTOH/IMHO's avatar

"I've watched Trump for 45 yrs; if he says he will do something, he does it." Like balance the budget, which he swore to do first time he ran? Yes, he hung the portrait of Andrew Jackson, a man who did balance 8 straight and left the U.S. $0.0 in debt in the Oval Office- and then proceeded to sign off on- not once veto- 4 straight TRILLION dollar deficits. When he left office, he had nothing good to say about any of his cabinet appointees, some of whom were indeed Deep State, except for poor Rudy Giuliani, who was left broke an all but lifeless thanks to DJT. But the first 100 days will tell the story this time- let's see.

Expand full comment
Breck's avatar

Monkey Werx? He's been disproved and outed as an agent of dis-info for ages now. All the stuff before you got around to MW, is a lot of hooey. Trump the master 4D chessplayer. Why not declare martial law and keep Biden's gang out of the White House to begin with, instead of all this complicated secretive, Byzantine mumbo-jumbo?

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Erdogan: Democracy is a bus. You get off at your stop.

This is our stop.

Expand full comment
Jim Hogue's avatar

The jurors are protected by the blob and vice versa. What happens if they lose their protection? Just askin'.

Expand full comment
Breck's avatar

It's not DC jurors. It's nominations like that asshole sheriff in Florida for Sec'y DEA. What was Trump doing while he absent-mindedly approved this guy? Thinking of his golf handicap?

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

12/02/24: What is the common denominator shared by 1) The OJ Simpson "not guilty" verdict and 2) the Hunter Biden "pardon"? You must guess/define it exactly (no hints or help on this one).

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

Only one of them had Kato Kaelin as a catamite?

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

12/02/24: Nope, but an excellent contribution to the James Howard Kunstler Comedy Compendium!

Expand full comment