763 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
IAN2364's avatar

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

"People

We are determined to end poverty and hunger, in all their forms and dimensions, and to ensure that all human beings can fulfil their potential in dignity and equality and in a healthy environment.

Prosperity

We are determined to ensure that all human beings can enjoy prosperous and fulfilling lives and that economic, social and technological progress occurs in harmony with nature.

Peace

We are determined to foster peaceful, just and inclusive societies which are free from fear and violence. There can be no sustainable development without peace and no peace without sustainable development.

**

Our vision

7. In these Goals and targets, we are setting out a supremely ambitious and transformational vision. We envisage a world free of poverty, hunger, disease and want, where all life can thrive. We envisage a world free of fear and violence. A world with universal literacy. A world with equitable and universal access to quality education at all levels, to health care and social protection, where physical, mental and social well-being are assured. A world where we reaffirm our commitments regarding the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation and where there is improved hygiene; and where food is sufficient, safe, affordable and nutritious. A world where human habitats are safe, resilient and sustainable and where there is universal access to affordable, reliable and sustainable energy.

8. We envisage a world of universal respect for human rights and human dignity, the rule of law, justice, equality and non-discrimination; of respect for race, ethnicity and cultural diversity; and of equal opportunity permitting the full realization of human potential and contributing to shared prosperity. A world which invests in its children and in which every child grows up free from violence and exploitation. A world in which every woman and girl enjoys full gender equality and all legal, social and economic barriers to their empowerment have been removed. A just, equitable, tolerant, open and socially inclusive world in which the needs of the most vulnerable are met.

9. We envisage a world in which every country enjoys sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and decent work for all. A world in which consumption and production patterns and use of all natural resources – from air to land, from rivers, lakes and aquifers to oceans and seas - are sustainable. One in which democracy, good governance and the rule of law as well as an enabling environment at national and international levels, are essential for sustainable development, including sustained and inclusive economic growth, social development, environmental protection and the eradication of poverty and hunger. One in which development and the application of technology are climate-sensitive, respect biodiversity and are resilient. One in which humanity lives in harmony with nature and in which wildlife and other living species are protected."

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

2030 Agenda is just so much bullshit. It sounds wonderful at the same time it is completely undoable. The world is currently in an expanding battle for limited resources and soon all countries will be fighting for water, Oil, rare earths, agricultural land.

BTW, G7 is meeting. Son of a gun, if BRICS+ is also meeting in Russia with destruction of the G7 as part of its agenda. Right now.

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

John, the 2030 Agenda identifies, details, and proposes solutions for many of the issues that people on Jim's message board complain about, but for which few have a (viable) solution.

It is my understanding that the majority of world leaders have embraced the agenda in one fashion or another (it appears that there is a pile of money for compliance), so it is stacking up to be leadership vs citizens. My understanding is that Putin and Xi are on board with this agenda, so how do you reconcile that?

The 2030 Agenda is already being implemented, so if you want to have a say or terminate it, shouldn't there be a discussion?

"Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all"

People are wired differently, where some have an advantage over others depending on the current format for life. Kamala Harris is a perfect example of a misfit who is setup to fail, and does not qualify to be in a leadership position. What is your solution to accommodate all the differences?

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

"People are wired differently, where some have an advantage over others depending on the current format for life."

Jim touched on this a few posts ago. Why do you think Jews dominate the high dollar positions?

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

So what if Jews inhabit the high places.

If you believe in America as it is designed, meritocracy counts more than anything. However, it is a function of the society to provide equal opportunity to everyone, which our government has sucked at big time. Just the fact that everyone seems to think it is the government's job to make jobs is a major malfunction of this society.

You know the Peter Principle, you rise to your level of incompetence. It is true, meritocracy takes us to where we fail, where it is just too much to handle. Recognition by managers is critical to keep it at a minimum. People should be able to reach up as far as they can though.

Letting the government make those decisions is what needs to stop, my solution is pure capitalism, where the market runs the show and people have the opportunity to excel to their limits. The government must be left out of the economy, other than supplying the money to support it. No corporate favoritism, think Boeing, no corporate lobbying, tax rates favoring venture capital and stock growth. Just a start.

Stop limiting economic growth and encourage it, damn Obama's modus operandi.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Well nepotism mitigates against meritocracy. Nevertheless, it will defeat it and/or destroy it in the short term. I think the Jews may have an artful combination going for them. Not a bad thing? Well they don't like us, you see. Google the Kalergi Plan to find out how much they don't.

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

The format for life is nothing more than a (flawed) game, and you admit that by promoting capitalism.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

OBTW, you know why Jews and Mormons do so well economically? They stand together, work together and support each other instead of constantly trying to rip each other up like the Gentiles seem to do. Our government and media is the antithesis of "together" so that By supporting each other, Jews and Mormons work their way into high positions easily.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

True. We can't compete against the level of nepotism plus real ability in many cases. We must imitate them - which means having nations of our own which they are not a part of.

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

In one breath you promote letting the free market work, and in the next you praise the Jews and Mormons for doing well economically because of "networking".

What about those who do not "network"?

The object of capitalism is to win it all.

Wining it all is the equivalent of Israel dominating its neighbors economically and militarily for decades, and in the end they are surrounded by the enemies they have created.

I don't have the answer, and perhaps there is no perfect answer, but capitalism plays out over time, and this is where we are at.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

IAN

No where did I say I favor their methodology, I do believe foremost in capitalism, pure capitalism with no government bias or interference. No where in the world does that exist, and the Leftists of America are fighting hard to try to get rid of capitalism here. We will rue the day that happens.

The object of capitalism is to win it all, is exactly right. When the market works, all boats rise according to the talents of the people. That is NOT the problem here. The government wants dependence to control the public, including their votes. They do not want a free society with meritocracy as the basis for achievement. They want servitude, feudal serfs to serve them. Capitalism rose from the feudalism of the Middle Ages along with the middle class. Socialism destroys the middle class.

Capitalism does play out, becoming crony capitalism as the government interferes and corrupts the free market and controls the creation of new companies and technologies.

That is where we are at. So now, who do you want as president, a businessman who has succeeded and favors a free market, or an ult-Left socialist who wants the government to make all decisions. Let me think.

Expand full comment