47 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jay Skywatcher's avatar

Kackula is a big puzzle. They picked the worst possible dud to try to insert. Obama was an illegal insert and chose Joe as insurance. Joe chose Kackula, then she couldn't find a stupider Democrat so she inserts a man that ruined his state. He is facing accusations of being a bisexual child molesters from 2 male former students that have started to talk. His legislation ideals fit that mold pretty well.

Still I don't think any election is too big to rig. She positively cannot we in without cheating so if she does it will be hell to pay. The nation will not roll over and play dead.

If she loses I think the illegals will rise up at the same time as the BLM and Antifa as terrorists.

Could be the Civil war either way they THINK they wanted. They won't like it!

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

Yes, but remember, the DOD has recently authorized lethal force to be used by American soldiers against us if so ordered. They won't use it against antifa or BLM.

Expand full comment
Beth Nicolaides's avatar

What about those possible microwave burns sustained by Trump rallygoers in NV last month?

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

"Microwave burns"? Lady, it was 110 Fahrenheit that day. The sun is a nuclear fusion reactor without any containment...what do you expect? Or perhaps it was the Jewish Space Lasers... you know, the ones that start hurricanes too....

Expand full comment
Beth Nicolaides's avatar

I expect it could be the sun . . . Or it could be some other type of radiation, especially since it was limited to a few on the dais. After all the unlikely shit that's been happening, why NOT RF burns from a directional antenna? I'm an amateur radio operator Extra class. Even I could make that happen. Easily. If I were a maniac.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

You're not even real are you? "Goldstein the Yenta." Try harder.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

Perfect time to test out the latest toy, eh?

Microwave burns- it makes sense now, thanks.

Expand full comment
Beth Nicolaides's avatar

Microwaves to disperse crowds are an old weapon.

Expand full comment
Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

KEENLY AWARE OF THIS.

80,000 ARMED AND TRAINED

IRS AGENTS.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

Property confiscation for when that 25 percent equity tax is enacted, should Harris get the presidency.

Expand full comment
Jay Skywatcher's avatar

Unearned capital gains tax of 25% will force sales to pay the tax. Many homeowners will become homeless and the illegals can buy the house with her free down payment.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

Exactly, exactly, my Harris voting friends were, umm, perturbed.

This is all part of the Great Taking; even your paper assets, such as stocks, will not have sufficient proof of 'ownership'. A commenter above mentions bail-ins, negative rates, and confiscation, and he is exactly right.

Expand full comment
Ron Anselmo's avatar

Yes, Alzaebo - after the Great Taking, it will be easier to tell what people don't own.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

Go READ the policy, dimwits Jay & Kathy...dumb ass losers! Unless you have assets of more than $100 million dollars or earn income of more than $1 million per annum, there is NOTHING for you to be concerned about. I very much doubt that anyone on this blog would qualify for this new imposition on the very wealthy, except perhaps, JohnAZ.

https://taxfoundation.org/blog/harris-unrealized-capital-gains-tax/

Expand full comment
Beth Nicolaides's avatar

So, you lack ethics and a basic sense of finance and economics. Did you also wear a red diaper?

Expand full comment
Joseph Grills's avatar

Slippery slope

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Huh? You definitely have an inflated idea of me? Maria, if you believe the pols are going to stop from taxing everyone because of campaign promises, you are going to be disappointed. The Left taxes more and more and spends more and more, it is their livelihood, their method of buying votes. They are evil. They will spend beaucoup bucks to figure out how to take money away from you without pissing you off.

You want an example? California, where tax and spend has evolved into an art. The goal of the national Leftists is to spread Californication all over the country. It is working well here in AZ.

Expand full comment
Ben R's avatar

Not just the left anymore the "right" also is spending like drunken sailors.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

In DC, the Congress especially, there is no Left and Right, just Deep State. Their access and maintenance of power depends on spending. That is their number one priority, preservation of the Deep State.

Expand full comment
astera's avatar

Yes.

Expand full comment
astera's avatar

Yes. Please shut off your caps lock.

Expand full comment
Robert Italia's avatar

Fuel for the already raging fire.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

What will happen when folks like Abbott and DeSantis tell the Feds under Kamala to Eff off and set secession in action? What happens when the NW area around Idaho do the same? Generally speaking, what happens when half the country decides to leave the USA and create their own country. Will the Dems of the East and West Coast in DC, try to stop the secession? Will a peaceable solution be found to a separation?

IMHO, the Leftist urbanites cannot let the Reds leave as their sustenance would be cutoff and the dependent Blues would have their hands out and up within a week.

Expand full comment
Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

What if employers ceased to collect taxes, SS, and insurance from paychecks?

Expand full comment
Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

We have already been threatened with, drones, F 16s, and nukes.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

Yes, especially the F-16s! I nearly crapped my pants when I heard that!

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Kathy, think. Who are they going to shoot at? Think of Texas ,the first drop out probably, shoot at Texans and sorry, East Coast, your oil is cut off. Shoot at the Red Mid-west and sorry, no more food, and that includes California’s Joaquin Valley, which is Red. Besides, how much of the military would favor shooting at Americans, much of them are from Red states.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Remember “ Don’t Mess with Texas”.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

They'll steal what they want from their unarmed neighbors and form gangs that cross state lines to prey on other states. Police will protect government, not citizens. After all, they still believe they'll get a pension if they can stick it out long enough.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Kathy, one comment. If a secession happens, there will be no pensions. There may be no police, just soldiers and rebels. A really big problem for the DC crowd will be who will the military back in a secession?

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

The military will back whoever pays them. That's what they did in Rome.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

I disagree, much of the military are from all those states that would secede, they would probably go home to support their locals. Besides, if we have a civil separation, there will be no worthwhile cash to give them.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

Yes, but they don't know that.

Expand full comment
Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

You can expect riots, looting, arson and murder when they run out of free.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

I've heard that insurance companies have already stated that they won't cover riot-related damages.

Expand full comment
ezinmn's avatar

It's written as an exclusion in the standard home insurance policy (US). Excluded from property coverage includes: War, invasion, insurrection, rebellion, revolution, civil war, usurped power, damage caused by civil, governmental or military authority to hinder or defend against an actual or impending enemy act. Hope that helps.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

Exactly - nothing new in that. It is a standard exclusion. Standard, not some premonition of the Civil War 2.0 that you 'conservatives' seem to be jonesing for.

Expand full comment
Ben R's avatar

Reality inversion bot 1.0 failing miserably

Expand full comment
MrMangoOnMyShoulder's avatar

You are a bad bot.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

I don't think they had anything else in their quiver. They weren't counting on Joe's dementia taking an upturn so fast (divine intervention?), and they didn't have any other viable candidate that they felt could win against Trump, so they went with the tried and true of color and gender. Hence, we have Harris.

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

They ran out of "insiders" who would volunteer for the job, and there wasn't time to vet new ones.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Good point. Who, in their right mind, would want to follow the debacle of the last four years? I know one.

Expand full comment
ezinmn's avatar

They had to find someone dumber than Joe Biden. No small task, but they found one.

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

Who, in their right mind, would want to consider the offer when better than half the population is sharpening their pitchforks?

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

I disagree, he was a placeholder there to run out the clock, until Kamala was the only available choice. Biden was a trojan horse, and Kammie was NOT a poor choice hastily made. She is entirely deliberate, the Manchurian dictator who will complete Obama and Soros's Revolution in time for 2030.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Remember the 2020 primary season and the Dem debates. Biden was chosen because he was the most moderate of the crazy Leftist candidates of which Kamala was one.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

Yes, it will. First and foremost, Americans are rule followers, and apathy reigns supreme.

Expand full comment