If you can walk away from the Summa thinking Aquinas a person lacking in the use of “critical thinking” for “willful ignorance,” you might want to see a professional for treatment of delusions of grandeur, my friend…
If you can walk away from the Summa thinking Aquinas a person lacking in the use of “critical thinking” for “willful ignorance,” you might want to see a professional for treatment of delusions of grandeur, my friend…
"Don't try to debate me; I'm an expert Christian..."
Surely there's Bible scripture about arrogance that you're breaching oh mighty expert with YOUR delusions of grandeur.
It's the all-loving omnibenevolent Gods desire to save sick babies.
Baby lives ~ God is amazing, and prayer works.
Baby dies ~ it was God's will and we aren't meant to know or understand the reasons these things happen.
It's in accordance with his plan you see. The baby was meant to die.
So, what purpose does prayer have?
This surely and precisely sums up the Christianity hoax, doesn't it?
GOD CAN'T LOSE!
A philosophical argument for God and a ham sandwich combined are worth slightly less than a ham sandwich, Granny. You and Aquinas can have as many philosophical arguments for “God” as you like, it doesn't change the fact that there's no evidence that there is one.
PS to Dennis:
If you can walk away from the Summa thinking Aquinas a person lacking in the use of “critical thinking” for “willful ignorance,” you might want to see a professional for treatment of delusions of grandeur, my friend…
"Don't try to debate me; I'm an expert Christian..."
Surely there's Bible scripture about arrogance that you're breaching oh mighty expert with YOUR delusions of grandeur.
It's the all-loving omnibenevolent Gods desire to save sick babies.
Baby lives ~ God is amazing, and prayer works.
Baby dies ~ it was God's will and we aren't meant to know or understand the reasons these things happen.
It's in accordance with his plan you see. The baby was meant to die.
So, what purpose does prayer have?
This surely and precisely sums up the Christianity hoax, doesn't it?
GOD CAN'T LOSE!
A philosophical argument for God and a ham sandwich combined are worth slightly less than a ham sandwich, Granny. You and Aquinas can have as many philosophical arguments for “God” as you like, it doesn't change the fact that there's no evidence that there is one.
Take care my dear