I’m not sure, but it’s not even a partisan issue. Judges have done this for over 200 years. The Marbury case involved a justice of the peace that wasn’t getting the respect he thought he deserved because then Secretary of State James Madison was actually following the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supremes sides with Marbury and judicial activism and review was set loose.
I’m not sure, but it’s not even a partisan issue. Judges have done this for over 200 years. The Marbury case involved a justice of the peace that wasn’t getting the respect he thought he deserved because then Secretary of State James Madison was actually following the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supremes sides with Marbury and judicial activism and review was set loose.
I’m not sure, but it’s not even a partisan issue. Judges have done this for over 200 years. The Marbury case involved a justice of the peace that wasn’t getting the respect he thought he deserved because then Secretary of State James Madison was actually following the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supremes sides with Marbury and judicial activism and review was set loose.