To all intents and purposes she is right. The laughingly-named Affordable Health Care Act was challenged as being unconstitutional, and what did SCOTUS do but justify it as a revenue bill- but the Constitution requires all revenue bills originate in the House. So SCOTUS, too is illiterate. Furthermore, the law requires all bills be read …
To all intents and purposes she is right. The laughingly-named Affordable Health Care Act was challenged as being unconstitutional, and what did SCOTUS do but justify it as a revenue bill- but the Constitution requires all revenue bills originate in the House. So SCOTUS, too is illiterate. Furthermore, the law requires all bills be read out in full before Congress, and there was no way this 2500 page monstrosity was going to be read out- so they got away with it by saying, again with no justification, that everyone had indeed read it on their own beforehand. It does not get much more unconstitutional than that!
To all intents and purposes she is right. The laughingly-named Affordable Health Care Act was challenged as being unconstitutional, and what did SCOTUS do but justify it as a revenue bill- but the Constitution requires all revenue bills originate in the House. So SCOTUS, too is illiterate. Furthermore, the law requires all bills be read out in full before Congress, and there was no way this 2500 page monstrosity was going to be read out- so they got away with it by saying, again with no justification, that everyone had indeed read it on their own beforehand. It does not get much more unconstitutional than that!