Thank you. People can go online and find whatever information fits their narrative but they don't seem to be willing to look at who the people are publishing the information or recognize that all of their predictions have failed miserably. Goof ball science like "accumulated cyclone energy" is quite simple to fake because all one has to do is be willing to lie about data that was never measurable to being with, only estimated. Tweak a parameter here and there, combine it with non-stop dishonest reporting on media channels owned completely by people who have an interest in pushing one particular narrative in order to drive government spending and sales of products like EVs, wind farms and solar panels, not to mention total control over people (a pure electric economy will be the end of freedom since your power will be turned off at the push of a button) and there you go. A perfect explanation for the garbage pseudo-science.
The other thing people pushing climate alarmism never try to ask or answer is "at what cost?" You want to cool the climate of Earth based on, again, an arbitrary "target temperature" at what cost? The inflated cost of energy will kill far more people than any incidental increase in temperature mankind could ever inflict upon the planet. And, by the way, increased cost of energy and artificial restriction of resources will resort in what we are seeing now all over the globe: increased war. How's war for the environment?
Well, I guess one way to cool the planet is nuclear winter. We are closer to it now than during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Great job, leaders of the "free" world. But, hey, let's not let a little thing like holistic effects into the picture. We need to reduce the planet's temperature by .5 degrees by any means necessary, yeah? smh
Good and not just because I agree with you. The cost of windfarms by every measure vs what they produce, same with the cost of solar, same with the moronic EV industry. Everything is a fraud and a lie designed to crush and control people and make the globo homos more wealthy and powerful than they are now.
I know people in FLA with Teslas who are worried they will explode from salt water flooding and have them parked away from the house/garage... crazy hun? Storm coming in, and they leave the cars out.. because they might burn down the house lol!
No EV is a great thing in their mind.. even when doesn't work in SnoPocalypses, or in icy weather or .. yeah with salt water and air exposure! EV a giant gaint con. Where does the electric to charge car come from? Coal, oil and gas, generated, ROFL. But but its energy green and friendly they protest, it doesn't pollute! Ha ha ha.. the absurdity these otherwise smart people twist their brains to pronounce. Why they have n brains a'tal!!
The absurdity of it all. Not to mention the net cost is far higher than Internal combustion. Same with wind turbines the cost can't even be amortized before they are junk. what about the billions allocated for charging stations? The grid can't begin to support large numbers of EVs. Now they have three charging stations or something like that? And as you say where the electricity comes from. And not just that, everything that goes into an EV has to be mined or extracted. What about the cost to bird life from the wind mills? What kind of consequences might that have? For me and of course I'm nobody the insanity of it all is mind boggling.
Well, Wilson, are there any better ideas out there on what to do when Peak oil starts hitting hard. I agree, CO2 is a BS power grab, as I said before, BUT an answer to the oil rundown must be found or WMBH will happen, world wide. I wish that nuclear generation would restart right now as we need to preserve oil instead of burning it in cars, NOW.
About 20 years ago, there were articles saying peak oil is a gigantic load of shit, that the mantle of the earth rides along on top of a core of liquid petroleum. This is allegedly the reason why old, spent oil fields recharge and can be made productive again. Whether this is yet another bit of quackery, or if it's accurate information that's being suppressed so we'll go along with the WEF's program, is anybody's guess.
peak oil is controversial but yes I agree, we need to discover different means of generating power for the future. Nuclear is a good option as well as hydrogen and probably many other things. Wind farms, solar and evs arenтАЩt the answers. Somehow there has to be politicians and a population who understand ChestertonтАЩs fence. No matter how greedy and convinced that they are gods.
There is an oil field discovered a few years ago below west Texas that is bigger than any field in Saudi Arabia. Add to that the incredible amounts of natural gas available - one of the cleanest fuels available - and there is still hundreds of years of "fossil" fuels around. There is simply no truth to be found in any media sources the vast majority of the public are subjected to daily (and have been for decades). While the west obsesses over CO2 and transsexuals China and Russia are just continuing to gain in power because they have not abandoned the fundamental rules of reality. Propaganda seems to be the only innovation the West has made in the past twenty years. When the same people telling you that the First Amendment is a problem are also telling us that the oceans are going to boil, a warning light should be going off in everyone's head
Well, the gods first make mad those whom they would destroy. We seem to want people in charge who hate us and want us dead, by any means necessary. As I've said for years, a people that's stupid enough to burn its food supply as fuel for cars will get what it deserves.
yes, I've also read that there is something like five hundred years of coal. all the climate hysterics said we'd run out of base metals, copper, zinc etc and first it was a new ice age, global warming is now climate change or something. Malthus was wrong and all the chicken littles since have been wrong. I've also read that oil is abiotic but have no idea whether that's true or not. Weather changes, sometimes it's a hard winter and a hot summer. droughts and dust bowls happen.
Climate catastrophe sales pitches are not different than the rain makers who came to prairie towns and told the folks they were sinners but he could make it rain if they paid their tithings or let him run off with the mayor's daughter. "boogety boogety boo", three days later it rains and the guy was prophet.
The nature of human beings never changes. It can't. It's part of the grand design. So, the 20% of people who shape the future will always either be supported by or hindered by the 80% who must be ideologically captured in order to storm the ramparts of the future's castles. Sometimes a passionate and eloquent orator like Ronald Regan or JFK or Julius Caesar comes along and sways people with his words and deeds, other times it's Hitler and Stalin and Mao who push enormous piles of bullshit, forcefully, onto people for so long they have no choice but to learn the hard way.
That's where we are with climatology and all the offshoots like trannies, DEI and borderless societies, the offshoots being coercion to obey the high priests of making it rain.
Ruth Gordon, that was a superb rational response. Well done.
Thank you. People can go online and find whatever information fits their narrative but they don't seem to be willing to look at who the people are publishing the information or recognize that all of their predictions have failed miserably. Goof ball science like "accumulated cyclone energy" is quite simple to fake because all one has to do is be willing to lie about data that was never measurable to being with, only estimated. Tweak a parameter here and there, combine it with non-stop dishonest reporting on media channels owned completely by people who have an interest in pushing one particular narrative in order to drive government spending and sales of products like EVs, wind farms and solar panels, not to mention total control over people (a pure electric economy will be the end of freedom since your power will be turned off at the push of a button) and there you go. A perfect explanation for the garbage pseudo-science.
The other thing people pushing climate alarmism never try to ask or answer is "at what cost?" You want to cool the climate of Earth based on, again, an arbitrary "target temperature" at what cost? The inflated cost of energy will kill far more people than any incidental increase in temperature mankind could ever inflict upon the planet. And, by the way, increased cost of energy and artificial restriction of resources will resort in what we are seeing now all over the globe: increased war. How's war for the environment?
Well, I guess one way to cool the planet is nuclear winter. We are closer to it now than during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Great job, leaders of the "free" world. But, hey, let's not let a little thing like holistic effects into the picture. We need to reduce the planet's temperature by .5 degrees by any means necessary, yeah? smh
Good and not just because I agree with you. The cost of windfarms by every measure vs what they produce, same with the cost of solar, same with the moronic EV industry. Everything is a fraud and a lie designed to crush and control people and make the globo homos more wealthy and powerful than they are now.
I don't know why this isn't obvious to people.
I know people in FLA with Teslas who are worried they will explode from salt water flooding and have them parked away from the house/garage... crazy hun? Storm coming in, and they leave the cars out.. because they might burn down the house lol!
And do they still believe that EVs are a savior of the planet?
No EV is a great thing in their mind.. even when doesn't work in SnoPocalypses, or in icy weather or .. yeah with salt water and air exposure! EV a giant gaint con. Where does the electric to charge car come from? Coal, oil and gas, generated, ROFL. But but its energy green and friendly they protest, it doesn't pollute! Ha ha ha.. the absurdity these otherwise smart people twist their brains to pronounce. Why they have n brains a'tal!!
The absurdity of it all. Not to mention the net cost is far higher than Internal combustion. Same with wind turbines the cost can't even be amortized before they are junk. what about the billions allocated for charging stations? The grid can't begin to support large numbers of EVs. Now they have three charging stations or something like that? And as you say where the electricity comes from. And not just that, everything that goes into an EV has to be mined or extracted. What about the cost to bird life from the wind mills? What kind of consequences might that have? For me and of course I'm nobody the insanity of it all is mind boggling.
What about the whales, too?
absolutely the whales and the dolphins and every other kind of sea life. These people think they can play God or think they are gods.
And they vote Democrat.
Well, Wilson, are there any better ideas out there on what to do when Peak oil starts hitting hard. I agree, CO2 is a BS power grab, as I said before, BUT an answer to the oil rundown must be found or WMBH will happen, world wide. I wish that nuclear generation would restart right now as we need to preserve oil instead of burning it in cars, NOW.
About 20 years ago, there were articles saying peak oil is a gigantic load of shit, that the mantle of the earth rides along on top of a core of liquid petroleum. This is allegedly the reason why old, spent oil fields recharge and can be made productive again. Whether this is yet another bit of quackery, or if it's accurate information that's being suppressed so we'll go along with the WEF's program, is anybody's guess.
It's simple It's not a problem.
peak oil is controversial but yes I agree, we need to discover different means of generating power for the future. Nuclear is a good option as well as hydrogen and probably many other things. Wind farms, solar and evs arenтАЩt the answers. Somehow there has to be politicians and a population who understand ChestertonтАЩs fence. No matter how greedy and convinced that they are gods.
There is an oil field discovered a few years ago below west Texas that is bigger than any field in Saudi Arabia. Add to that the incredible amounts of natural gas available - one of the cleanest fuels available - and there is still hundreds of years of "fossil" fuels around. There is simply no truth to be found in any media sources the vast majority of the public are subjected to daily (and have been for decades). While the west obsesses over CO2 and transsexuals China and Russia are just continuing to gain in power because they have not abandoned the fundamental rules of reality. Propaganda seems to be the only innovation the West has made in the past twenty years. When the same people telling you that the First Amendment is a problem are also telling us that the oceans are going to boil, a warning light should be going off in everyone's head
Well, the gods first make mad those whom they would destroy. We seem to want people in charge who hate us and want us dead, by any means necessary. As I've said for years, a people that's stupid enough to burn its food supply as fuel for cars will get what it deserves.
yes, I've also read that there is something like five hundred years of coal. all the climate hysterics said we'd run out of base metals, copper, zinc etc and first it was a new ice age, global warming is now climate change or something. Malthus was wrong and all the chicken littles since have been wrong. I've also read that oil is abiotic but have no idea whether that's true or not. Weather changes, sometimes it's a hard winter and a hot summer. droughts and dust bowls happen.
Climate catastrophe sales pitches are not different than the rain makers who came to prairie towns and told the folks they were sinners but he could make it rain if they paid their tithings or let him run off with the mayor's daughter. "boogety boogety boo", three days later it rains and the guy was prophet.
The nature of human beings never changes. It can't. It's part of the grand design. So, the 20% of people who shape the future will always either be supported by or hindered by the 80% who must be ideologically captured in order to storm the ramparts of the future's castles. Sometimes a passionate and eloquent orator like Ronald Regan or JFK or Julius Caesar comes along and sways people with his words and deeds, other times it's Hitler and Stalin and Mao who push enormous piles of bullshit, forcefully, onto people for so long they have no choice but to learn the hard way.
That's where we are with climatology and all the offshoots like trannies, DEI and borderless societies, the offshoots being coercion to obey the high priests of making it rain.
Of course, it was ever thus.
Fuckin' A, Ruth!
You would think at this point we would have learned how the game is played.