It seems to me you need to denounce anyone who does not affirm what you wish to believe is true without any actual evidence of anything but claims of truth that amount to the same ol' appeals to authority. Lab tests are proof of something? What? a lab test claims identification of a substance and that equals proof? Of what exactly? Nothi…
It seems to me you need to denounce anyone who does not affirm what you wish to believe is true without any actual evidence of anything but claims of truth that amount to the same ol' appeals to authority. Lab tests are proof of something? What? a lab test claims identification of a substance and that equals proof? Of what exactly? Nothing causal. CD4 counts? People can have regular CD4 counts and be sick with "AIDS", as in, one of the numerous conditions that are only AIDS with verification from an HIV 'test' that readily admits that the test itself does not confirm the presence of the virus and needs further confirmation. i.e., 'we think you have a piece or pieces of DNA that may be what we now call HIV but it's not conclusive of anything.' Or, a person can have low CD4 counts and actually be healthy. Those are facts that individuals have attested to. Proves nothing either way. Why is it that TB becomes AIDS when taking an unreliable diagnostic that is interpreted (yes, tests are interpreted) to exhibit HIV, but is only TB when there is no interpretation of HIV present? How is it that numerous people over the years take HIV tests and from one to the next in relatively short time frames they get both positive and negative results, or indeterminate results? It's illustrative about the testing and that results are unreliable.
Again, good luck, and perhaps look into the fraudulence of Robert Gallo and his HIV studies in "Fear of the Invisible." If you really wish to know you would investigate rather than demanding others conform to what I can only perceive as your indoctrinated line of thinking that act as shackles upon your consciousness. None but ourselves can free our minds.
It seems to me you need to denounce anyone who does not affirm what you wish to believe is true without any actual evidence of anything but claims of truth that amount to the same ol' appeals to authority. Lab tests are proof of something? What? a lab test claims identification of a substance and that equals proof? Of what exactly? Nothing causal. CD4 counts? People can have regular CD4 counts and be sick with "AIDS", as in, one of the numerous conditions that are only AIDS with verification from an HIV 'test' that readily admits that the test itself does not confirm the presence of the virus and needs further confirmation. i.e., 'we think you have a piece or pieces of DNA that may be what we now call HIV but it's not conclusive of anything.' Or, a person can have low CD4 counts and actually be healthy. Those are facts that individuals have attested to. Proves nothing either way. Why is it that TB becomes AIDS when taking an unreliable diagnostic that is interpreted (yes, tests are interpreted) to exhibit HIV, but is only TB when there is no interpretation of HIV present? How is it that numerous people over the years take HIV tests and from one to the next in relatively short time frames they get both positive and negative results, or indeterminate results? It's illustrative about the testing and that results are unreliable.
Again, good luck, and perhaps look into the fraudulence of Robert Gallo and his HIV studies in "Fear of the Invisible." If you really wish to know you would investigate rather than demanding others conform to what I can only perceive as your indoctrinated line of thinking that act as shackles upon your consciousness. None but ourselves can free our minds.