A strawman fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion.
I am not engaging in a strawman fallacy. I am arguing that HIV is the cause of AIDS and as evidence I am presenting myself as a case study that provides solid evidence in support of my argument. I have defamed no one. I thi…
A strawman fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion.
I am not engaging in a strawman fallacy. I am arguing that HIV is the cause of AIDS and as evidence I am presenting myself as a case study that provides solid evidence in support of my argument. I have defamed no one. I think you are much closer to earning that accusation by claiming that I could be a troll. Everything that I have seen with my lab work, and my doctor supports the fact that HIV causes AIDS. I have simply asked for you to explain to me how it is when I stop my medication my CD4 counts plummet and my viral load explodes. Has my doctor misdiagnosed me?
Doctors are totally indoctrinated and yours likely is. "Viral load" indicates PCR which is not a diagnostic test and is utterly meaningless. CD4 may or may not have any meaning. I can ask "do you feel worse without the medication?" but the problem with that could be, and I don't know regarding such medications but I'd bet it could be true, is that you may have a dependency so it may not be wise to just go off without alternative naturopathic means of boosting immunity. It's mainly about healthy immune function-- wouldn't worry about all the hocus pocus of tests and numbers as opposed to internally measurements of health. Tons of people got off HIV meds and that's when they got better (famous example of Magic Johnson who's been alive more than 30 years-- shame he doesn't talk about it). You may be getting immune-oriented therapeutics that are far less toxic than stuff from 30-40 years ago, but that doesn't mean drugs have to be a lifelong treatment and that's our medical model-- sick people for life. There are better ways to boost immunity over time, but all I can say is do due diligence to research as I am not a practitioner or expert. I just know pharma controls medicine and their intent is profit by maintaining a constant supply of patients to profit off of.
A strawman fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion.
I am not engaging in a strawman fallacy. I am arguing that HIV is the cause of AIDS and as evidence I am presenting myself as a case study that provides solid evidence in support of my argument. I have defamed no one. I think you are much closer to earning that accusation by claiming that I could be a troll. Everything that I have seen with my lab work, and my doctor supports the fact that HIV causes AIDS. I have simply asked for you to explain to me how it is when I stop my medication my CD4 counts plummet and my viral load explodes. Has my doctor misdiagnosed me?
Doctors are totally indoctrinated and yours likely is. "Viral load" indicates PCR which is not a diagnostic test and is utterly meaningless. CD4 may or may not have any meaning. I can ask "do you feel worse without the medication?" but the problem with that could be, and I don't know regarding such medications but I'd bet it could be true, is that you may have a dependency so it may not be wise to just go off without alternative naturopathic means of boosting immunity. It's mainly about healthy immune function-- wouldn't worry about all the hocus pocus of tests and numbers as opposed to internally measurements of health. Tons of people got off HIV meds and that's when they got better (famous example of Magic Johnson who's been alive more than 30 years-- shame he doesn't talk about it). You may be getting immune-oriented therapeutics that are far less toxic than stuff from 30-40 years ago, but that doesn't mean drugs have to be a lifelong treatment and that's our medical model-- sick people for life. There are better ways to boost immunity over time, but all I can say is do due diligence to research as I am not a practitioner or expert. I just know pharma controls medicine and their intent is profit by maintaining a constant supply of patients to profit off of.