You make it sound as if AIDS is no longer an issue. Poppers and hardcore lifestyles have never been shown to cause AIDS or any of the related syndromes. If I stop taking my AIDS medications my CD4 counts will plummet and my viral load counts go from undetectable to exponentially high numbers all without my doctor or lab techs having any …
You make it sound as if AIDS is no longer an issue. Poppers and hardcore lifestyles have never been shown to cause AIDS or any of the related syndromes. If I stop taking my AIDS medications my CD4 counts will plummet and my viral load counts go from undetectable to exponentially high numbers all without my doctor or lab techs having any way to know that I am presently off of my medications. There are 100,000s, if not millions, of people around the world whose blood work does the same. None of what you have said explains how this can possibly be. You are simply denying the lived experience of 100,000s of people.
You're just ignoring everything I've said and throwing out a strawman argument. If you aren't willing to do deep research and investigate then you'll be easily manipulated into what institutional authorities claim and you'll continue to believe it on faith. That is, if you're not a troll of some sort playing a part that just tosses out defamatory claims of "denialism" as you do here. Such statements are either very amateurish or just based on basic ignorance. Go watch "House of Numbers" and a host of many other documentaries and read books that don't affirm your position and biases so you can begin to face up to all the lies you've been told and begin to free your mind if you genuinely believe what you are saying. It's clear you've never genuinely taken in different viewpoints if you mean what you say here. Good luck.
A strawman fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion.
I am not engaging in a strawman fallacy. I am arguing that HIV is the cause of AIDS and as evidence I am presenting myself as a case study that provides solid evidence in support of my argument. I have defamed no one. I think you are much closer to earning that accusation by claiming that I could be a troll. Everything that I have seen with my lab work, and my doctor supports the fact that HIV causes AIDS. I have simply asked for you to explain to me how it is when I stop my medication my CD4 counts plummet and my viral load explodes. Has my doctor misdiagnosed me?
Doctors are totally indoctrinated and yours likely is. "Viral load" indicates PCR which is not a diagnostic test and is utterly meaningless. CD4 may or may not have any meaning. I can ask "do you feel worse without the medication?" but the problem with that could be, and I don't know regarding such medications but I'd bet it could be true, is that you may have a dependency so it may not be wise to just go off without alternative naturopathic means of boosting immunity. It's mainly about healthy immune function-- wouldn't worry about all the hocus pocus of tests and numbers as opposed to internally measurements of health. Tons of people got off HIV meds and that's when they got better (famous example of Magic Johnson who's been alive more than 30 years-- shame he doesn't talk about it). You may be getting immune-oriented therapeutics that are far less toxic than stuff from 30-40 years ago, but that doesn't mean drugs have to be a lifelong treatment and that's our medical model-- sick people for life. There are better ways to boost immunity over time, but all I can say is do due diligence to research as I am not a practitioner or expert. I just know pharma controls medicine and their intent is profit by maintaining a constant supply of patients to profit off of.
Actually not at all true. I have seen the documentaries and I read the real Anthony Faucci. I have also pointed out that even RFK jr remains agnostic on the question of HIV causing AIDS. If it weren't for that I might not be so patient. All the things you are accusing I could say about you and more. You have not explained how my lab work shows a direct correlation between my medication compliance and my CD4 counts. It is the collapse of CD4 counts that leads to all of the syndromes related to AIDS that is a fact.
It seems to me you need to denounce anyone who does not affirm what you wish to believe is true without any actual evidence of anything but claims of truth that amount to the same ol' appeals to authority. Lab tests are proof of something? What? a lab test claims identification of a substance and that equals proof? Of what exactly? Nothing causal. CD4 counts? People can have regular CD4 counts and be sick with "AIDS", as in, one of the numerous conditions that are only AIDS with verification from an HIV 'test' that readily admits that the test itself does not confirm the presence of the virus and needs further confirmation. i.e., 'we think you have a piece or pieces of DNA that may be what we now call HIV but it's not conclusive of anything.' Or, a person can have low CD4 counts and actually be healthy. Those are facts that individuals have attested to. Proves nothing either way. Why is it that TB becomes AIDS when taking an unreliable diagnostic that is interpreted (yes, tests are interpreted) to exhibit HIV, but is only TB when there is no interpretation of HIV present? How is it that numerous people over the years take HIV tests and from one to the next in relatively short time frames they get both positive and negative results, or indeterminate results? It's illustrative about the testing and that results are unreliable.
Again, good luck, and perhaps look into the fraudulence of Robert Gallo and his HIV studies in "Fear of the Invisible." If you really wish to know you would investigate rather than demanding others conform to what I can only perceive as your indoctrinated line of thinking that act as shackles upon your consciousness. None but ourselves can free our minds.
You make it sound as if AIDS is no longer an issue. Poppers and hardcore lifestyles have never been shown to cause AIDS or any of the related syndromes. If I stop taking my AIDS medications my CD4 counts will plummet and my viral load counts go from undetectable to exponentially high numbers all without my doctor or lab techs having any way to know that I am presently off of my medications. There are 100,000s, if not millions, of people around the world whose blood work does the same. None of what you have said explains how this can possibly be. You are simply denying the lived experience of 100,000s of people.
You're just ignoring everything I've said and throwing out a strawman argument. If you aren't willing to do deep research and investigate then you'll be easily manipulated into what institutional authorities claim and you'll continue to believe it on faith. That is, if you're not a troll of some sort playing a part that just tosses out defamatory claims of "denialism" as you do here. Such statements are either very amateurish or just based on basic ignorance. Go watch "House of Numbers" and a host of many other documentaries and read books that don't affirm your position and biases so you can begin to face up to all the lies you've been told and begin to free your mind if you genuinely believe what you are saying. It's clear you've never genuinely taken in different viewpoints if you mean what you say here. Good luck.
A strawman fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion.
I am not engaging in a strawman fallacy. I am arguing that HIV is the cause of AIDS and as evidence I am presenting myself as a case study that provides solid evidence in support of my argument. I have defamed no one. I think you are much closer to earning that accusation by claiming that I could be a troll. Everything that I have seen with my lab work, and my doctor supports the fact that HIV causes AIDS. I have simply asked for you to explain to me how it is when I stop my medication my CD4 counts plummet and my viral load explodes. Has my doctor misdiagnosed me?
Doctors are totally indoctrinated and yours likely is. "Viral load" indicates PCR which is not a diagnostic test and is utterly meaningless. CD4 may or may not have any meaning. I can ask "do you feel worse without the medication?" but the problem with that could be, and I don't know regarding such medications but I'd bet it could be true, is that you may have a dependency so it may not be wise to just go off without alternative naturopathic means of boosting immunity. It's mainly about healthy immune function-- wouldn't worry about all the hocus pocus of tests and numbers as opposed to internally measurements of health. Tons of people got off HIV meds and that's when they got better (famous example of Magic Johnson who's been alive more than 30 years-- shame he doesn't talk about it). You may be getting immune-oriented therapeutics that are far less toxic than stuff from 30-40 years ago, but that doesn't mean drugs have to be a lifelong treatment and that's our medical model-- sick people for life. There are better ways to boost immunity over time, but all I can say is do due diligence to research as I am not a practitioner or expert. I just know pharma controls medicine and their intent is profit by maintaining a constant supply of patients to profit off of.
Actually not at all true. I have seen the documentaries and I read the real Anthony Faucci. I have also pointed out that even RFK jr remains agnostic on the question of HIV causing AIDS. If it weren't for that I might not be so patient. All the things you are accusing I could say about you and more. You have not explained how my lab work shows a direct correlation between my medication compliance and my CD4 counts. It is the collapse of CD4 counts that leads to all of the syndromes related to AIDS that is a fact.
It seems to me you need to denounce anyone who does not affirm what you wish to believe is true without any actual evidence of anything but claims of truth that amount to the same ol' appeals to authority. Lab tests are proof of something? What? a lab test claims identification of a substance and that equals proof? Of what exactly? Nothing causal. CD4 counts? People can have regular CD4 counts and be sick with "AIDS", as in, one of the numerous conditions that are only AIDS with verification from an HIV 'test' that readily admits that the test itself does not confirm the presence of the virus and needs further confirmation. i.e., 'we think you have a piece or pieces of DNA that may be what we now call HIV but it's not conclusive of anything.' Or, a person can have low CD4 counts and actually be healthy. Those are facts that individuals have attested to. Proves nothing either way. Why is it that TB becomes AIDS when taking an unreliable diagnostic that is interpreted (yes, tests are interpreted) to exhibit HIV, but is only TB when there is no interpretation of HIV present? How is it that numerous people over the years take HIV tests and from one to the next in relatively short time frames they get both positive and negative results, or indeterminate results? It's illustrative about the testing and that results are unreliable.
Again, good luck, and perhaps look into the fraudulence of Robert Gallo and his HIV studies in "Fear of the Invisible." If you really wish to know you would investigate rather than demanding others conform to what I can only perceive as your indoctrinated line of thinking that act as shackles upon your consciousness. None but ourselves can free our minds.