In short, I will simply challenge your claim that there is "conclusive evidence" with regard to HIV causing AIDS thesis. Scientists repeating the assumption of "HIV is the probably cause of AIDS" and perhaps transforming 'probable' into a presumption of 'definite' is the installation of dogma which has no basis in any experiments anywher…
In short, I will simply challenge your claim that there is "conclusive evidence" with regard to HIV causing AIDS thesis. Scientists repeating the assumption of "HIV is the probably cause of AIDS" and perhaps transforming 'probable' into a presumption of 'definite' is the installation of dogma which has no basis in any experiments anywhere on the planet. Have you watched "House of Numbers" or many other documentaries on the matter which precede that film which came out, I think, in 2009? Have you read Duesberg's book, "Inventing the AIDS Virus"? Expensive to buy now but a public library might have a copy. Have you seen Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR who stated clearly it is not a diagnostic tool) talk about his process of realizing there was no proof behind the HIV causes AIDS thesis? Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQJ_Sw0iwMI&ab_channel=DissociatedPress
This link is part of additional material to "House of Numbers" that was not in the film.
If you are not familiar with any of this, and really the entire historical, political, and social milieu that has been unearthed about the topic at this point than I would have to suggest that you've been programmed into this dogma and are perhaps too well-entrenched to accept what I am saying or to be swayed to really do a deep dive that challenges your own assumptions and biases that have been fed to you for decades. There is a wealth of material on the matter that exposes the HIV-AIDS hypothesis as a very flimsy thesis.
One other very important recommendation if you do decide to research more deeply would be to pick up a copy of Janine Roberts', "Fear of the Invisible", which is an excellent work of investigative journalism that carries the reader along her process of discovery that ultimate leads to the understanding that all of Robert Gallo's papers on the HIV-AIDS thesis (wasn't called HIV at the time) were fraudulent. In fact, Gallo's announcement on the alleged cause of AIDS was made without any of his papers even being published to that point.
In short, I will simply challenge your claim that there is "conclusive evidence" with regard to HIV causing AIDS thesis. Scientists repeating the assumption of "HIV is the probably cause of AIDS" and perhaps transforming 'probable' into a presumption of 'definite' is the installation of dogma which has no basis in any experiments anywhere on the planet. Have you watched "House of Numbers" or many other documentaries on the matter which precede that film which came out, I think, in 2009? Have you read Duesberg's book, "Inventing the AIDS Virus"? Expensive to buy now but a public library might have a copy. Have you seen Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR who stated clearly it is not a diagnostic tool) talk about his process of realizing there was no proof behind the HIV causes AIDS thesis? Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQJ_Sw0iwMI&ab_channel=DissociatedPress
This link is part of additional material to "House of Numbers" that was not in the film.
If you are not familiar with any of this, and really the entire historical, political, and social milieu that has been unearthed about the topic at this point than I would have to suggest that you've been programmed into this dogma and are perhaps too well-entrenched to accept what I am saying or to be swayed to really do a deep dive that challenges your own assumptions and biases that have been fed to you for decades. There is a wealth of material on the matter that exposes the HIV-AIDS hypothesis as a very flimsy thesis.
One other very important recommendation if you do decide to research more deeply would be to pick up a copy of Janine Roberts', "Fear of the Invisible", which is an excellent work of investigative journalism that carries the reader along her process of discovery that ultimate leads to the understanding that all of Robert Gallo's papers on the HIV-AIDS thesis (wasn't called HIV at the time) were fraudulent. In fact, Gallo's announcement on the alleged cause of AIDS was made without any of his papers even being published to that point.