Yes exactly! We can claim that a theory has not been proven to our satisfaction but that hardly means the original question has somehow gone away. In the meantime for those who remain skeptical, I have provided a statistical means to prove that HIV does in fact cause AIDS. That offer has been ignored because there would seem to be an age…
Yes exactly! We can claim that a theory has not been proven to our satisfaction but that hardly means the original question has somehow gone away. In the meantime for those who remain skeptical, I have provided a statistical means to prove that HIV does in fact cause AIDS. That offer has been ignored because there would seem to be an agenda to deny any argument that does not lead to an already given conclusion.
There is another writer on Substack, I have forgotten her name and no longer follow her, she recommended a fascinating book called Dr. Mary's Monkey that provides some interesting clues. It is possible that a retrovirus was made to be toxic with intent to be used against Fidel Castro in the early 60s. I had considered writing an article on the book but it has nothing to do with astrology and at any rate my stamina is in very short supply lately.
Are the cocktails of drugs truly anti-retroviral? Or do they perform immunotherapy as well? I ask because if HIV is the sole retrovirus to cause harm, could it be that a retrovirus is present because of AIDS, not because it causes AIDS?
The Cocktail of drugs causes the HIV retrovirus to become dormant in the body. This is demonstrated with viral load testing. If a patient has built up immunity to the drugs due to poor compliance the viral load will remain high. Tests can then be done to determine which cocktail of drugs will work. When the patient is switched to the new regimen the viral load will drop to non-detectable and the patient regains their health. All of this has been demonstrated in clinics across the world for the past 30 years and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that HIV in fact causes AIDS.
Yes exactly! We can claim that a theory has not been proven to our satisfaction but that hardly means the original question has somehow gone away. In the meantime for those who remain skeptical, I have provided a statistical means to prove that HIV does in fact cause AIDS. That offer has been ignored because there would seem to be an agenda to deny any argument that does not lead to an already given conclusion.
There is another writer on Substack, I have forgotten her name and no longer follow her, she recommended a fascinating book called Dr. Mary's Monkey that provides some interesting clues. It is possible that a retrovirus was made to be toxic with intent to be used against Fidel Castro in the early 60s. I had considered writing an article on the book but it has nothing to do with astrology and at any rate my stamina is in very short supply lately.
Are the cocktails of drugs truly anti-retroviral? Or do they perform immunotherapy as well? I ask because if HIV is the sole retrovirus to cause harm, could it be that a retrovirus is present because of AIDS, not because it causes AIDS?
The Cocktail of drugs causes the HIV retrovirus to become dormant in the body. This is demonstrated with viral load testing. If a patient has built up immunity to the drugs due to poor compliance the viral load will remain high. Tests can then be done to determine which cocktail of drugs will work. When the patient is switched to the new regimen the viral load will drop to non-detectable and the patient regains their health. All of this has been demonstrated in clinics across the world for the past 30 years and proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that HIV in fact causes AIDS.