Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Arturo's avatar

This week I did some digging—not opinion pieces, not partisan rants, just raw numbers and the bureaucratic language behind them. What I found was this: In 2024, the Biden administration deported 3,706 people labeled as “suspected or convicted gang members.” That’s not conjecture—that’s straight from the Department of Homeland Security. And yet somehow, this mass removal didn’t generate a whisper from the mainstream press. No headlines. No think pieces. No somber profiles on NPR.

So I kept digging, trying to understand what “suspected” meant. Who was doing the suspecting? What was the threshold? Was there evidence, or just vibes?

Turns out, it wasn’t much different than how gang affiliations were “identified” under Trump. Tattoos. Neighborhoods. Associations. A traffic stop where the passenger looked nervous. A Facebook post. Nothing that would hold up in court. Nothing that involves a jury or a judge or even a clear accusation. Just a label. Stamped. Processed. Deported.

And here’s where it gets Orwellian. Under Biden, there were no names released. No mugshots. No profiles. No gang names even mentioned. Just numbers—clean, faceless numbers. Like they were vanishing data rows instead of people, it was “border enforcement” by spreadsheet. No story, no resistance. And because it was wrapped in technocratic language and not Trump’s Twitter feed, the media let it slide.

Compare that to what happened when Trump named names. When he put a face, a label, a life on someone—Kilmar Abrego Garcia, for example—the media went into full-on martyr mode. Senator Chris Van Hollen is now at the airport with a carry-on bag full of due process arguments, ready to fly to El Salvador and bring Kilmar back to his family. A restraining order filed by Kilmar’s wife in 2021? Not mentioned. Doesn’t fit the arc.

This isn’t about protecting immigrants. This is about optics. One president plays the quiet bureaucrat, another plays the loud demagogue—and both disappear people. The difference is only who we’re told to feel bad for.

So here’s the truth: I’m not here to defend Trump. I’m not here to bash Biden. I’m here to point out the perverse theater of it all. If deporting 3,706 “suspected” gang members is okay under Biden, but a constitutional crisis under Trump, then we’ve lost the plot.

Due process doesn’t care who’s in office. But apparently, the media does.

And no, the Democrats won’t win anything running on this. It’s not a winning issue, it’s not even a coherent one. It’ll be forgotten by the time midterms roll around—replaced by a new face, a new outrage, a new hill to die on. If they’re smart, they’ll stop elevating murky cases like Kilmar’s as banner causes. Because in a campaign built on contradictions, the only thing that grows is the doubt.

Expand full comment
Disinfected's avatar

Nice! Biting satire with an extra helping of caustic sarcasm! Well done!

Expand full comment
474 more comments...