But Palestinian terror groups are above international law?
You argue from a position of bullshit sitting nice and safe in 'Murica knowing full well if 'Murica and Israel switched places we would have leveled Gaza, west bank, and Iran decades ago.
But Palestinian terror groups are above international law?
You argue from a position of bullshit sitting nice and safe in 'Murica knowing full well if 'Murica and Israel switched places we would have leveled Gaza, west bank, and Iran decades ago.
Description: Offering a poorly supported claim about what might have happened in the past or future, if (the hypothetical part) circumstances or conditions were different. The fallacy also entails treating future hypothetical situations as if they are fact." ~ logicallyfallacious.com
Back to armchair bullshit which means you don't have shit to say.
Funny to as this one you engage in on almost every post of yours about countries and people.
How ever history is on my side and not on yours.
Ask the confederacy about going against America.
Ask any Indian tribe and especially the Sioux what happens when someone engages in campaigns of terrorism against America on American soil or adjacent in the case of Mexico they fucked around and found out.
Much as you just did.
Put down the bong and quit drinking the water already and oh..
"This used to be Mexicano land gringo La Raza and La Mecha!
Never mind there was less than 100,000 of them across the entire desert southwest and they lost it in a war." ~ Ben
____
"Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in 'what about ...?') is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense against the original accusation.
From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument." ~ Wikipedia
If we consider the energy-resource angle at that link, we may conclude, or at least strongly suspect, that the religious/historical angle is a bit of a red herring, that Israel is a bit of a color-revolution backdoor to the region's energy resources, and that if there were no energy resources in the region, the religious angle would be a bit of a backwater issue hardly bothered with, if at all, and left to the locals to sort out.
Personally, I'd be surprised if Israel wasn't seeing its last days, at least as it is now or appears to be going. Why? Because if it's a backdoor to the region's energy resources, other increasingly-powerful countries combined-- say, BRICS+-- want access to them as well.
Everyone probably doesn't want too much of a war over there to break out because it might mean the destruction of the energy infrastructure, which of course would defeat the purpose of a 'hot' war.
So it appears that they will be 'beating around the bush' asymmetrially-- an assassinated/installed leader here, a few bombed civilians there...
This used to be Mexicano land gringo La Raza and La Mecha!
Never mind there was less than 100,000 of them across the entire desert southwest and they lost it in a war.
Thats like the Mexicans showing back up in 1948 breeding like roaches and telling Americans to leave Los Angeles and then starting terror groups because we Americans won't leave.
They showed up for work and 75 years later decided these Americans are getting uppity and then deciding to take over using demographic shifts.
Oh, wait that is what's happening!
You didn't build that now you speak Obamas language.
But Palestinian terror groups are above international law?
You argue from a position of bullshit sitting nice and safe in 'Murica knowing full well if 'Murica and Israel switched places we would have leveled Gaza, west bank, and Iran decades ago.
"... if 'Murica and Israel switched places we would have leveled Gaza, west bank, and Iran decades ago." ~ Ben
____
"Hypothesis Contrary to Fact
(also known as: counterfactual fallacy, speculative fallacy, 'what if' fallacy, wouldchuck)
Description: Offering a poorly supported claim about what might have happened in the past or future, if (the hypothetical part) circumstances or conditions were different. The fallacy also entails treating future hypothetical situations as if they are fact." ~ logicallyfallacious.com
Back to armchair bullshit which means you don't have shit to say.
Funny to as this one you engage in on almost every post of yours about countries and people.
How ever history is on my side and not on yours.
Ask the confederacy about going against America.
Ask any Indian tribe and especially the Sioux what happens when someone engages in campaigns of terrorism against America on American soil or adjacent in the case of Mexico they fucked around and found out.
Much as you just did.
Put down the bong and quit drinking the water already and oh..
Have a nice go fuck off day.
You sure are a very angry little sailor, Ben.
Hate is a malignancy. Extensive therapy is your best hope at salvaging your mental health.
History is not hate it just is.
History is full of past hate and it can traverse through time!
You engage in hate everyday.
Palestinians hate Jews and Israel and that hate is returned in kind.
Duh.
History is written by the victors, Ben. History is 98% bull shit.
-----
I don't hate. I seek peace.
98% your statement is 98% bullshit you sure its not only 75%?
Hahaha! Ok, you got me there.
Bernardo: Who jumped me the first day I came here?
One of the Jets: Who asked you to come here?
The Palis are the Jets. You're a shark.
"This used to be Mexicano land gringo La Raza and La Mecha!
Never mind there was less than 100,000 of them across the entire desert southwest and they lost it in a war." ~ Ben
____
"Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in 'what about ...?') is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense against the original accusation.
From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument." ~ Wikipedia
See also here:
kunstler.com/p/judgepocalypse-now/comment/102333416
If we consider the energy-resource angle at that link, we may conclude, or at least strongly suspect, that the religious/historical angle is a bit of a red herring, that Israel is a bit of a color-revolution backdoor to the region's energy resources, and that if there were no energy resources in the region, the religious angle would be a bit of a backwater issue hardly bothered with, if at all, and left to the locals to sort out.
Personally, I'd be surprised if Israel wasn't seeing its last days, at least as it is now or appears to be going. Why? Because if it's a backdoor to the region's energy resources, other increasingly-powerful countries combined-- say, BRICS+-- want access to them as well.
Everyone probably doesn't want too much of a war over there to break out because it might mean the destruction of the energy infrastructure, which of course would defeat the purpose of a 'hot' war.
So it appears that they will be 'beating around the bush' asymmetrially-- an assassinated/installed leader here, a few bombed civilians there...
kunstler.com/p/judgepocalypse-now/comment/102320625
Weak sauce and deflection.
This used to be Mexicano land gringo La Raza and La Mecha!
Never mind there was less than 100,000 of them across the entire desert southwest and they lost it in a war.
Thats like the Mexicans showing back up in 1948 breeding like roaches and telling Americans to leave Los Angeles and then starting terror groups because we Americans won't leave.
They showed up for work and 75 years later decided these Americans are getting uppity and then deciding to take over using demographic shifts.
Oh, wait that is what's happening!
You didn't build that now you speak Obamas language.
How far back do you want to go dingus?