Perhaps Trump viewed that as being the only opportunity to get Obama to open-up and say something that would implicate himself as one of the scoundrels that perpetrated the lawfare against him?
Did Trump instruct Mark Zuckerberg to confess his crime/s to Joe Rogan (and the world), so as to set things …
Perhaps Trump viewed that as being the only opportunity to get Obama to open-up and say something that would implicate himself as one of the scoundrels that perpetrated the lawfare against him?
Did Trump instruct Mark Zuckerberg to confess his crime/s to Joe Rogan (and the world), so as to set things up for an investigation into who was in on the formation and implementation of the lawfare and censorship?
Judge nap and some guests are critical of Tulsi Gabbard's refusal to put an end to unauthorized blanket searches by intel agencies. Is this so that the Trump administration can track down and serve justice on all the Biden administration scoundrels, and then Trump will enact/approve legislation to close the door?
It appears that "Joe Biden" and the 2030 Agenda was all about preparing the world population for a more meager format for life to deal with an anticipated recession/depression; while it appears that Trump's plan is to increase business activity. I anticipate that AI will render the old format for life null and void; and the successful new format for life will require efficiency and practicality at all levels, and those who refuse to play, or get up to speed (for whatever reason), will lose by default.
Armstrong has been discussing various agreements between EU member states and Ukraine, increased funding and such, in the hope of fast-tracking Ukraine into NATO membership. I have in mind that within the last month, he also posted that the US would be dealing with a recession going into 2026, and a depression for the EU. Doesn't this put Trump as the monkey in the drivers seat, where he will be able to have his way with the EU? Does Trump want NATO to survive? How about if it is according to his terms?
Does Trump want an end to the conflict in Ukraine, or does he want it to continue so that he has leverage in negotiations with Putin? Or, will Trump's actions be predicated by the terms that Putin dictates?
An increase in business activity will require deals be made so that nations live with each other, and as a consequence, AI survives. Wouldn't this be in the interest of Russia and China as well?
Along the line of my thoughts as well.
Perhaps Trump viewed that as being the only opportunity to get Obama to open-up and say something that would implicate himself as one of the scoundrels that perpetrated the lawfare against him?
Did Trump instruct Mark Zuckerberg to confess his crime/s to Joe Rogan (and the world), so as to set things up for an investigation into who was in on the formation and implementation of the lawfare and censorship?
Judge nap and some guests are critical of Tulsi Gabbard's refusal to put an end to unauthorized blanket searches by intel agencies. Is this so that the Trump administration can track down and serve justice on all the Biden administration scoundrels, and then Trump will enact/approve legislation to close the door?
It appears that "Joe Biden" and the 2030 Agenda was all about preparing the world population for a more meager format for life to deal with an anticipated recession/depression; while it appears that Trump's plan is to increase business activity. I anticipate that AI will render the old format for life null and void; and the successful new format for life will require efficiency and practicality at all levels, and those who refuse to play, or get up to speed (for whatever reason), will lose by default.
Armstrong has been discussing various agreements between EU member states and Ukraine, increased funding and such, in the hope of fast-tracking Ukraine into NATO membership. I have in mind that within the last month, he also posted that the US would be dealing with a recession going into 2026, and a depression for the EU. Doesn't this put Trump as the monkey in the drivers seat, where he will be able to have his way with the EU? Does Trump want NATO to survive? How about if it is according to his terms?
Does Trump want an end to the conflict in Ukraine, or does he want it to continue so that he has leverage in negotiations with Putin? Or, will Trump's actions be predicated by the terms that Putin dictates?
An increase in business activity will require deals be made so that nations live with each other, and as a consequence, AI survives. Wouldn't this be in the interest of Russia and China as well?
Trump really must be great after all. He got eight paragraphs from you.