Like the man who shows up to a gun fight with a knife....
Obviously, you have ZERO tactical training with guns or knives as the man with a knife has a very good chance of carving up a man with gun if he is inside 10 feet.
Not in percentage terms, dipshit. People with guns prevail over people with knives in a fight to the death approximately 100% of the time.
It happens all the time? Where a guy with the knife wins a fight to the death against a guy with a gun? Please provide some links (which should be plentiful given that it happens "all the time").
-----
Regardless of your nitpicking of my analogy, intellectually, Sheila runs circles around your little U-S-A! U-S-A! warhawk brain.
In close-quarters combat, a skilled knife wielder can potentially defeat someone with a gun due to the knife's faster deployment time and ability to strike within a shorter range, where a gun is less effective; this concept is often referred to as the "21-foot rule" in self-defense training, meaning an attacker with a knife can reach their target before someone can draw and fire a gun from that distance.
Key points about why a knife might have an advantage in close quarters:
Faster reaction time: Drawing and firing a gun takes longer than simply lunging with a knife.
No line of sight needed: A knife can be used effectively even when there are obstacles blocking a clear shot.
Immediate damage potential: A well-placed knife strike can inflict severe injury quickly.
The most important fact in all this most gun owners don't have a round in the chamber ready to go unless it's a revolver.
I am doing my own research, dipshit. Talking to experts is research. D'uh!
I guess that you have ZERO links backing up your case. Shocker! That's strange since you claim that it happens all the time.
Your standard m.o.: You claim some bull shit and then, when challenged for links to back-up your bull shit, you tell your foe to prove you wrong (when, clearly, it is YOUR responsibility to prove that you're right).
You truly are dumber than dirt.
I guess that you don't understand what "a gun fight" means. A gun fight means that the guy with the gun already has a round in the chamber and/or is almost always a revolver.
Look at Phil lie.
Well, when does Phil not lie?
Like the man who showed up to a gun fight with a knife, Ben brings his little warhawk brain to battle wits with Sheila.
Like the man who shows up to a gun fight with a knife....
Obviously, you have ZERO tactical training with guns or knives as the man with a knife has a very good chance of carving up a man with gun if he is inside 10 feet.
You once again prove you know nothing.
Ummm ... that's the whole point, Einstein. The people with the guns don't allow the moron with the knife anywhere near 10 feet. D'uh!
Have you never seen 'Raiders of the Lost Ark'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQKrmDLvijo
And yet it happens all the time.
Especially in urban areas.
Go ahead filthy make more of an ass of yourself.
Not in percentage terms, dipshit. People with guns prevail over people with knives in a fight to the death approximately 100% of the time.
It happens all the time? Where a guy with the knife wins a fight to the death against a guy with a gun? Please provide some links (which should be plentiful given that it happens "all the time").
-----
Regardless of your nitpicking of my analogy, intellectually, Sheila runs circles around your little U-S-A! U-S-A! warhawk brain.
You should do your own research but...
In close-quarters combat, a skilled knife wielder can potentially defeat someone with a gun due to the knife's faster deployment time and ability to strike within a shorter range, where a gun is less effective; this concept is often referred to as the "21-foot rule" in self-defense training, meaning an attacker with a knife can reach their target before someone can draw and fire a gun from that distance.
Key points about why a knife might have an advantage in close quarters:
Faster reaction time: Drawing and firing a gun takes longer than simply lunging with a knife.
No line of sight needed: A knife can be used effectively even when there are obstacles blocking a clear shot.
Immediate damage potential: A well-placed knife strike can inflict severe injury quickly.
The most important fact in all this most gun owners don't have a round in the chamber ready to go unless it's a revolver.
That ego of yours must be a real pisser in life.
I am doing my own research, dipshit. Talking to experts is research. D'uh!
I guess that you have ZERO links backing up your case. Shocker! That's strange since you claim that it happens all the time.
Your standard m.o.: You claim some bull shit and then, when challenged for links to back-up your bull shit, you tell your foe to prove you wrong (when, clearly, it is YOUR responsibility to prove that you're right).
You truly are dumber than dirt.
I guess that you don't understand what "a gun fight" means. A gun fight means that the guy with the gun already has a round in the chamber and/or is almost always a revolver.
Unreal! Gun fights excluding revolvers! Hahaha!
You're so full of shit that your eyes are brown.
My life is just fine, thanks.
Says the guy that does random drive by posts with zero proof ever.
I have never seen you post one thing proving your opinionated posts...ever.
www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjVmJOU3bSLAxWFI0QIHaB-BO0Qz40FegQIDRAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DUpxfo_jBrDE&usg=AOvVaw2M3J3YFcr4OI924a56Q0xF&opi=89978449
For your ignorant review.
Even in your lameass, hypothetical demo video, the gun usually wins.
They are standing 3 feet away from each other, you fucking moron!
That's not showing up to a gun fight, you fucking moron!
Revolvers are not holstered in a gun fight, you fucking moron!
You are a fucking moron, you fucking moron!
How did gun fights start back in the day?
Two guys having words in a bar close range.
Try and keep up.