To be dismissed as an idiot on a site where people genuinely think the Trump 'assassination' attempt was real (and was Iran's doing), complete with the ridiculous Iwo Jima pastiche, is a compliment. Not to mention that they don't remotely get Trump's (i.e.Trump the Actor's) role in the ongoing psyop. They got the evil-idiot Biden's role, but not President Warp Speed, who has for some time now had Baaahby on board who hasn't mentioned the poison shots for over 6 months because the worst danger to man, woman and child is not now the next stage of the global technocratic coup and the coming biodigital slave system, but the colouring in Froot Loops.
Baaaahby who just submitted himself to ritual humiliation to get his feet under the table (either that or he was always dodgy as hell - there isn't a middle option).
And then there's the transhumanist Luciferian who wants to put chips in your brain. Peter Thiel's pal.
Bought. And. Paid. For. All of them. 'One Nation under Blackmail', per Whitney. What I certainly don't intend to do is attempt to persuade any of the folks on here otherwise. Lots of people are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and I'm not a psychiatrist, so providing professional help is beyond me.
Like the man who shows up to a gun fight with a knife....
Obviously, you have ZERO tactical training with guns or knives as the man with a knife has a very good chance of carving up a man with gun if he is inside 10 feet.
Not in percentage terms, dipshit. People with guns prevail over people with knives in a fight to the death approximately 100% of the time.
It happens all the time? Where a guy with the knife wins a fight to the death against a guy with a gun? Please provide some links (which should be plentiful given that it happens "all the time").
-----
Regardless of your nitpicking of my analogy, intellectually, Sheila runs circles around your little U-S-A! U-S-A! warhawk brain.
In close-quarters combat, a skilled knife wielder can potentially defeat someone with a gun due to the knife's faster deployment time and ability to strike within a shorter range, where a gun is less effective; this concept is often referred to as the "21-foot rule" in self-defense training, meaning an attacker with a knife can reach their target before someone can draw and fire a gun from that distance.
Key points about why a knife might have an advantage in close quarters:
Faster reaction time: Drawing and firing a gun takes longer than simply lunging with a knife.
No line of sight needed: A knife can be used effectively even when there are obstacles blocking a clear shot.
Immediate damage potential: A well-placed knife strike can inflict severe injury quickly.
The most important fact in all this most gun owners don't have a round in the chamber ready to go unless it's a revolver.
Ben, you are being ganged up on, calmly back away. These haters feed on each other, they all have the same character, hate everybody and everything. No matter who has inhabited the White House or DC, they hate them.
Well, they used men of more advanced civilizations to build their beautiful Mosques, but they've always been traders and know a bit about finance. So know what they never did? They never turned their finances over to an alien people who hate them. So in this sense at least, they are far smarter than we are.
The CIA engineered the overthrow of Iran's elected leader, Mossadegh, in 1953, and put the (then young) Shah of Iran in charge, because the British wanted to control Iran's oil.
The Shah and his secret police executed hundreds or thousands of people and tortured many more.
That's blood on America's hands.
History did not start in 1979.
What is "terrorism"? What was the US firebombing of German and Japanese cities, culminating in the nuclear destruction of two of them?
Odd you ignore the millions of people suffering under an even more brutal regime in IRAN now!
That of course goes against your narrative.
You ignore the millions of people that did not have to deal with a full-scale invasion of Japan or that the Japanese had literally told women and children American GI's would rape and murder them.
Or how the Japanese treated anyone who fell under their power.
Japanese cruelty was legendary.
Nor are you dealing with the reality that a bombing campaign would cause ANYWHERE they dropped them in to burn they made their houses from wood and paper.
Even more telling you ignore Japan's own attempts at the bomb both their army and navy tried to make one and came fairly close but of course Jap nukes are somehow safer and saner had they actually succeeded in making them.
Or that infamous order that the remaining Japanese should fight with sharpened bamboo sticks to the last Japanese person in Japan called operation downfall.
Seems you like to argue the same tired bullshit forever but never actually learn much.
Iran is responsible for the deaths of thousands of American servicemen through terrorism they’ve sponsored
The US deep state and Mossad blew up 3000 of your own people in one go. I'd clean up at home first.
When did this happen?
Oh you are one of them.
You are dismissed as an idiot.
Sheila: You have a very simple choice in your life:
Agree with Ben or be an idiot.
Ben knows all. Good people agree with Ben 100%. Those that do not are Marxist, hating idiots.
Ben claims the power of God.
To be dismissed as an idiot on a site where people genuinely think the Trump 'assassination' attempt was real (and was Iran's doing), complete with the ridiculous Iwo Jima pastiche, is a compliment. Not to mention that they don't remotely get Trump's (i.e.Trump the Actor's) role in the ongoing psyop. They got the evil-idiot Biden's role, but not President Warp Speed, who has for some time now had Baaahby on board who hasn't mentioned the poison shots for over 6 months because the worst danger to man, woman and child is not now the next stage of the global technocratic coup and the coming biodigital slave system, but the colouring in Froot Loops.
Baaaahby who just submitted himself to ritual humiliation to get his feet under the table (either that or he was always dodgy as hell - there isn't a middle option).
And then there's the transhumanist Luciferian who wants to put chips in your brain. Peter Thiel's pal.
Bought. And. Paid. For. All of them. 'One Nation under Blackmail', per Whitney. What I certainly don't intend to do is attempt to persuade any of the folks on here otherwise. Lots of people are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and I'm not a psychiatrist, so providing professional help is beyond me.
Brilliant! Thank you!
Note: WARp SpEED is their WAR against God's SEED. mRNA is their science to pull mankind from our birthright: God's image.
It is pure evil.
Look at Phil lie.
Well, when does Phil not lie?
Like the man who showed up to a gun fight with a knife, Ben brings his little warhawk brain to battle wits with Sheila.
Like the man who shows up to a gun fight with a knife....
Obviously, you have ZERO tactical training with guns or knives as the man with a knife has a very good chance of carving up a man with gun if he is inside 10 feet.
You once again prove you know nothing.
Ummm ... that's the whole point, Einstein. The people with the guns don't allow the moron with the knife anywhere near 10 feet. D'uh!
Have you never seen 'Raiders of the Lost Ark'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQKrmDLvijo
And yet it happens all the time.
Especially in urban areas.
Go ahead filthy make more of an ass of yourself.
Not in percentage terms, dipshit. People with guns prevail over people with knives in a fight to the death approximately 100% of the time.
It happens all the time? Where a guy with the knife wins a fight to the death against a guy with a gun? Please provide some links (which should be plentiful given that it happens "all the time").
-----
Regardless of your nitpicking of my analogy, intellectually, Sheila runs circles around your little U-S-A! U-S-A! warhawk brain.
You should do your own research but...
In close-quarters combat, a skilled knife wielder can potentially defeat someone with a gun due to the knife's faster deployment time and ability to strike within a shorter range, where a gun is less effective; this concept is often referred to as the "21-foot rule" in self-defense training, meaning an attacker with a knife can reach their target before someone can draw and fire a gun from that distance.
Key points about why a knife might have an advantage in close quarters:
Faster reaction time: Drawing and firing a gun takes longer than simply lunging with a knife.
No line of sight needed: A knife can be used effectively even when there are obstacles blocking a clear shot.
Immediate damage potential: A well-placed knife strike can inflict severe injury quickly.
The most important fact in all this most gun owners don't have a round in the chamber ready to go unless it's a revolver.
That ego of yours must be a real pisser in life.
Hmmm ... maybe if you ceased running earth for your corporate profits there'd be no reason for terrorists. Have you ever thought of that?
Have you ever thought they tell us exactly what they want, and it has nothing to do with corporations or profit but instead with Prophet.
Ben, you are being ganged up on, calmly back away. These haters feed on each other, they all have the same character, hate everybody and everything. No matter who has inhabited the White House or DC, they hate them.
Not in my nature John.
Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes.
Well, they used men of more advanced civilizations to build their beautiful Mosques, but they've always been traders and know a bit about finance. So know what they never did? They never turned their finances over to an alien people who hate them. So in this sense at least, they are far smarter than we are.
The CIA engineered the overthrow of Iran's elected leader, Mossadegh, in 1953, and put the (then young) Shah of Iran in charge, because the British wanted to control Iran's oil.
The Shah and his secret police executed hundreds or thousands of people and tortured many more.
That's blood on America's hands.
History did not start in 1979.
What is "terrorism"? What was the US firebombing of German and Japanese cities, culminating in the nuclear destruction of two of them?
Odd you ignore the millions of people suffering under an even more brutal regime in IRAN now!
That of course goes against your narrative.
You ignore the millions of people that did not have to deal with a full-scale invasion of Japan or that the Japanese had literally told women and children American GI's would rape and murder them.
Or how the Japanese treated anyone who fell under their power.
Japanese cruelty was legendary.
Nor are you dealing with the reality that a bombing campaign would cause ANYWHERE they dropped them in to burn they made their houses from wood and paper.
Even more telling you ignore Japan's own attempts at the bomb both their army and navy tried to make one and came fairly close but of course Jap nukes are somehow safer and saner had they actually succeeded in making them.
Or that infamous order that the remaining Japanese should fight with sharpened bamboo sticks to the last Japanese person in Japan called operation downfall.
Seems you like to argue the same tired bullshit forever but never actually learn much.
/ROLLS EYES
Easy! Just desserts!