“It’s really hard to govern today. . . . The First Amendment stands as a major block.” Once in awhile the veil is lifted, and they bare their objectives for all the world to see. It doesn't happen very often - in fact it occurs very rarely. But when it does, it underscores all that their actions tell us about them. Absolute, unchallengea…
“It’s really hard to govern today. . . . The First Amendment stands as a major block.” Once in awhile the veil is lifted, and they bare their objectives for all the world to see. It doesn't happen very often - in fact it occurs very rarely. But when it does, it underscores all that their actions tell us about them. Absolute, unchallengeable power. Apart from the constructive abolition of the 1st Amendment, they must dilute the 2nd Amendment to the point where it's little more than words scratched on centuries old parchment. Then comes the liquidation of the undesirables a la the Khmer Rouge, Stalin, etc. etc. etc. This story is old, but each time it happens it is as though it had never happened before.
They've been whittling away at the 2nd amendment for years, a bump stock here, a large capacity magazine there, until now the government outguns the citizenry (and Joe sneeringly reminded us that they have F-16s).
1) To form a means of self-defense for the country and each state. A militia will be formed for protection and the people will be armed with weapons to do that protection. Even in the Civil war, states sent their militias to fight for the North and South, remember Chamberlain’s 20th Maine? Arms were guaranteed to each individual for use in the militia. One difference then is demonstrated in Williamsburg, the Armory where all weapons were stored that could not be stored at home. People needed arms for self-protection in those days just as today.
2) The main reason that Dem socialists want those guns, to enable Jefferson’s proclamation in the Declaration that it is the responsibility of a people to overthrow a bad overbearing government. Today’s Leftist Deep State IS a bad overbearing government. They want our guns and they do not give a shit about the Constitution.
Bullshit. John and Abigail Adams had the most romantic relationship and send each other beautiful letters. I don’t believe it about the misogyny. You are listening to a bunch of crappy propaganda from the government. Why would you trust them?
The founders were men of their times. The USA is where Blacks became free, and women got the vote and inhabit many governmental offices today. You America haters, especially from overseas can kiss my butt.
my apology for asking if you had a firearm before knowing you're a kiwi - that's New Zealander, right? So, of course your options - like your opinions - are limited. And living in Seattle for 41 years explains much about your perception of America. You are incorrect in a great many of your assumptions, however your "views" of our country from across the ocean, in another hemisphere - are perhaps best kept in your own part of the world. And f.y.i. - it's "black powder" rifles or pistols. The gunshot victims your "doctor daughters" deal with, are likely due to "black powered" firearms.
you sure are sad in your attacks, kiwi (rhymes with "weewee"). And as for 'obnoxious', seems you have no other argument other than the superiority of N.Z. and it's folks. We saw how you let a horsefaced woman run your country during Covid, the lock downs and threats. Is that the "freedom" you spoke of. I can assure you that during my years in aviation, I have worked in far more states and countries than you have. I am certainly not "the most knowledgeable guy in the world" - I am, however, more intelligent than you. As for your "racist" comment, I am married to a native American woman; and bear no umbrage toward any race. My.statement about "black powered" weapons was because most shootings in cities nowadays are committed by young black men; that's just a fact. And, it was because apparently they don't teach proofreading over there.
Lovely country, by the way. I enjoyed it on each of my visits there. Sadly, though, it does have a few folks there pretty high on themselves; so much so that they will dump on a country that provided a decades long career. You're the "asshole"; "mate". Get over yourself.
course it matters you wake up!! People have to know information to defend themselves.
The government loves ignorant people who don’t pay attention to patterns. They love to blame people who are blameless. Blame the people who are actually shooting. Stop with the propaganda. The TV, media and government are fooling you.
The five cities in the USA that have the highest homicide rate are Chicago, Detroit, Wash.DC, St. Louis and New Orleans, They ALL have very strict gun control laws.
Your assertion is BS. Gun Control is not the answer. People control is always the answer. Guns do not pull their own triggers, people do. If guns are taken away, people will stab each other.
Dennis, you face the same dilemma that the politicians face, How do you convince PEOPLE not to kill each other? Gum control is not the answer. Precedent? Prohibition. Hey, maybe New Zealand’s solution is not to have two completely different peoples trying to live together, hating each other like Americans are doing now. Solution? Ban political parties and vote for the best guy. One of Mc Cains best ideas was to limit the amount of money afforded to political parties, especially from billionaires. When I think of all the good that could be done with the money wasted on TV political ads, it is disgusting.
One more, how come each of the school shootings are done by mental cases that are on FBI watch lists? My question is, why have the watch list if no one is going to do anything with the info? Also, IMO, precedent has been set here with two cases where the parents are being held to account for their children’s actions, a really good move.
We've always had the 2nd amendment but we haven't always had a crime problem. It's corruption of the culture, not the guns per se. And of course, Blacks.
Oh, silly me saying idiot and Socialist is being redundant.
You have no business commenting on Americans right to bear arms and anything you say is opinion.
It's a right as expressed by our wonderful American Constitution nothing is changing that and unlike you, I have served in my countries military and continue to serve in a capacity even now.
You don't live here, nor do you understand what being an American is like.
As far as the other "insult" you already used that sorry one on Jarek in fact I would say it's probably some serious projection on your part matchstick man.
While we are at it the loudmouth Kiwi is resorting to insults and name calling while being a brave keyboard warrior himself. While attempting to say bad things about others bravery. Hypocrisy is very annoying, and the results make you look like a sad garden variety troll.
You still don't have a clue and I would lay money down that most of your post about working in the US is bullshit. Especially as a construction worker.
Dennis: if you remove the "inner city" (oops….a dog whistle according to Libs) statistics of violent assaults and homicides the USA is one of the LEAST violent countries in the world. Thank Diversity & Cultural Enrichment for the high firearm misuse.
True. Of what use are fighter and bomber aircraft in a Civil War fought in your country on territory you must preserve in order to prosper? Will a military of volunteers from your own citizens violently suppress the rebels who may be family & friends?
If the Progressive Elites want a violent confrontation with the Citizens, let them be first to arms and out front in battle.
Then they probably still won't understand or appreciate guerrilla warfare, with internal being the worst.
The planes have to land and pilots eat eventually and to know and interact with others, like on the ground.
That's in large part why civs collapse probably. Because they have the worst of a relatively small set of people slippy-sloping progressively upward on high horses-- apparently like that 'haircut-in-search-of-a-conscience/brain'-- who seem to think that it's their rules (AKA, 'The Law', as if it's immutable like the laws of physics) or the highway.
No it's not the law. It never was and never will be, not for long, anyway.
The last time I checked, Joe Biden doesn’t know how to fly and F-16, doubtful he knows how to fly a kite for that matter, besides living on a beach where kite flying is fun. I digress, he doesn’t know that Dr. Jill doesn’t know that the septic truck that pumps human waste from Air Force One is NOT the Jet A fuel truck, and imagine Hunter pulling the flags and pins out of the 500 pound ordinance under the wings…exactly not going to happen. (Can you see ole Hunter on the CVN Gerald Ford heaving deck trying to pull the pins? Hmmm, that might be worth some money spent to witness.) No they don’t get that Charlie is out here in the bush, we starve but squat and get stronger, insurgents work that way, they get hungry and more determined, ever meet an angry insurgent, likely you won’t, but try torturing one. You won’t get far. That is what all these midwits miss, all around them are insurgents, they don’t see it, the same way the brass in Saigon, Baghdad and Kabul didn’t see it, but they are there, living and biding their time. John Forbes “Live shot” Kerry likely has an IQ of around 100, just smart enough to be identified as not hopelessly dumb, but really dumb. Prep school, Yale, a path parted for him by wealth, never challenged and allowed to run untethered from reality his whole life and especially as Secretary of State, he got away with it. He reminds one of the kid in your class at (name the prep school) who is still angry he was not voted student head of the school, lost by a whisker if you ask him, but actually because he was a brown nosing snitch the student body hated his ass and didn’t vote for him…go figure 80 years old and still angry, not a good way to be, thieving everyone’s oxygen with his prattle. All revolutions end the same, not with a bang but whimper. One can ask what happens with the USA and its revolution, it was a divorce so doesn’t count…unless it continues and those pressing the dialectic prevail. My money is on the insurgents. May take a while, but it worked in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan as example….
In a different way, Macron lifted the veil in 2022 when he cited '... the end of abundance'.
That's the very same issue that JHK referred to in his book 'The Long Emergency' (2005).
Clearly at least one person in France who's advising Macron understands that 1) fossil fuels are the lifeblood of industrial society 2) they're not infinite and 3) 'Limits to Growth' was broadly correct. Some in the US deep state realise too, read 'The Last Oil Shock' (2007).
If we look at the WEF, UN, etc, policies, we see a common thread - a response to over-population and financial collapse in the context of depleting and degraded resources, principally oil,coal and gas, but also all ores and minerals.
It's all about the rationing of energy and resources. And of life itself.
Exactly. They are right about many things. But their response is to try and power down the World while staying at the top - at the expense of all humanity. Thus they must be destroyed. Alas those that fight them deny the truths they believe in because they believe in them.
Figures in an Oxfam report suggested that if billionaires and multi-millionaires could live more modestly - maybe more like 'mere' millionaires - global GHG emissions could fall 30-40%.
I'm not holding my breath because most billonaires seem to think differently from 'normal' people. Warren Buffett was considered unusual in the past because he lived in a typical suburban house, not in a mansion.
George Bush 41 laughingly referred to Bill Clinton and Al Gore as "Bozo and Ozone" (they had the last laugh on him, though, as the election turned out), but "The Inconvenient Truth" about Gore is that he a 24 karat phony when it comes to environmentalism and "decarbonizing" the economy, living in a 50,000 sq ft mansion and crisscrossing the nation in his ozone-depleting private jet.
It would help, for a start to select candidates who were known for operating successful businesses but lived modestly, such as Ron Paul, or Sam Walton (even the big city Chicago boss Richard Daley was known to have lived in a modest home.) This would also exclude gluttons like New Jersey's Chris ("Crisco") Christy.
Yes, Lugh, add on the fact that those PTB want to change things so that you and I take the hit and not them. That is why they need to be torn down from their perches. Now who is the better candidate to tear them down?
Xavier, very good. One thing though is that change of how mankind does its business HAS to happen, the whole debate depends on how it will be done, the hard way (war etc.) or an easy way (adaptation). So far, economic and physical war seems to be the sole way.
It's probably a good idea to vote for Trump to buy us time, but to see him as your lord and savior is just ludicrous. At the end of the day he is just another Jew tool in the ZOG.
America's probably too big. The admin of a large enough land area-- the projection of power-- takes energy and we're past peak oil. Nuclear? So-called renewable? Unsure, but, frankly, I hope not. Otherwise, the power elite may have us by the balls, like for a longer time.
So, one moral of the story might be, 'careful what you wish for'.
Yes the mass murder of women and children in Gaza supported by all these assholes is so beautiful isn't it? And certainly worth funding above the needs of our citizens who paid the taxes in the first place. So forgive me if I find your juvenile substance free venting to be beneath contempt
What percent of the general population have a clue about the 2030 Agenda, and "Joe Biden" being "committed to the full implementation of 2030 Agenda and the SDGs, at home and abroad"?
What percent of the US population view and believe anything that is promoted on the RT site?
If there were a (inter)national discussion about this, it would highlight the fact that the existing format for life is nothing more than a flawed game, and then that would beg the question: What should be the qualifications for leadership to navigate the world out of the current predicament?
And then that would lead to the question: What if a nation like Russia does not want to share its resources with the rest of the world, including future generations? Could it be that is what the conflict in Ukraine is all about?
And what about Xi's vision for China being the center of the world. Does that mean that Xi will dominate the 2030 agenda, and essentially be the de facto leadership to navigate the world out of the current predicament?
Will the voice of the population count for anything? Will the NWO leadership be accountable to anyone?
If the existing format for life is nothing more than a flawed game, then who gets to keep what?
Sure looks like the world needs conflict to create an opportunity for someone to grab the power and declare de facto leadership.
Xi Van Fleet lived through such a time, and has been sounding the alarm that similar circumstances that lead up to Mao's power grab in China, have been happening in the US today.
Therefore Corporate Capitalists cannot be allowed to rule. Resources must be carefully marshalled, not squandered for profit or in frivolous pursuits. How did this jibe with Americanism? It doesn't.
There is an American way to handle a transition to a less energy intensive society though, and that's a return to the society of the founders with yeoman family farms, and more local craft oriented enterprises making high quality items that can be maintained and even passed down the generations. My hope would be we can at least maintain some benefits of modernity like CNC machines, but the future is local.
I am all for the yeoman farms and small business/craft-oriented society you describe, but I fear this is a pipe dream. We are no longer Hobbits, isolated from those around us in The Shire. Even when Tolkien was writing about that idyllic world, it was already over, something he tacitly acknowledged. Supporting ourselves on our own parcel of farmland sounds very appealing, but it takes but one bad crop year, one summer of drought or torrential spring rain to annihilate any hopes of succeeding in that endeavor. To be honest, we need abundant available energy to survive. Without energy to power our society, we are doomed to live in a Hobbesian world. With sufficient energy, everyone benefits. We don't have to burn our forests to stay warm as before, nor do we need to mine coal, as alternative sources like natural gas are so abundant. Advances in safe nuclear power generation are already available and, unless the luddites among us prevail, will be coming on line soon enough. Our problem is not too much energy; it is not enough. Oh, and also too many politicians whose goal is to gather as much power as we allow them to have unto themselves at our expense.
The entire national- and world- manufacturing order is thrown into disarray by the imposition of different sets of rules. One reason that natural gas currently trades for one quarter of its former high (under $3/mcf vs $13+) is, even though it is massively cleaner burning than coal, that it is being demonized in the U.S. as "contributing to global warming," even as massively polluted(the joke is that their national bird is the looney) China continues to ADD coal-burning plants- and is accorded Most Favorable Nation status when it comes to exporting its products more cheaply, costing jobs elsewhere. Yet, ironically, their efforts to reduce pollution in their major cities is the driving reason for their emphasis on EV's, which are helping destroy both European and American car makers(See today's Stellantis news) who cannot compete except with big tariffs
"[China's] efforts to reduce pollution in their major cities is the driving reason for their emphasis on EV's"
No.
China makes EVs because they believe the rest of the world will buy EVs instead of ICE vehicles, due to the Globalist policies which outsourced manufacturing to China. China discovered they can make EVs cheaply, and the trend was born.
Caveat Emptor if you buy a Chinese made vehicle or a vehicle with extensive China-manufactured parts.
Well I living in a homestead myself, so like Johnson kicking the rock as evidence of its real existence, I refute you thus. Clearly you haven't recovered enough from being a lawyer.
I admire and envy your independence. However, you are availing yourself of the internet to respond to me only because there is sufficient energy to power its myriad servers, etc. And unless you are Amish, I assume you use gasoline/diesel-powered equipment like chainsaws, tractors, etc. and have electricity to power your lights as well as your computer and an internet connection. (If you are Amish, a population with which I am intimately familiar, that is a different situation. And shame on you for using the internet like the English!) That was my point; we do not live in Eighteenth Century Colonial Williamsburg. Nor, for that matter, do most of us even live like Sean James, whose "My Self Reliance" podcast I enjoy immensely, but who still is reliant on "civilization" for much of his substance. I am glad we still have pockets of such pre-industrial lifestyles with their tried and true means of existence and perhaps things may unravel to the point where we all are compelled to live like that again, but I pray not. (Should that become necessary, you certainly have a leg up on the likes of me.) However, I prefer that life be not poor, nasty, brutish and short. I like painless dentistry, anesthesia for surgery and antibiotics to treat infections that, in those halcyon days of our yeoman farmer ancestors frequently killed their victims. Not to mention the ability to travel to the dentist, hospital or pharmacy to obtain such goods and services. Nonetheless, best of luck with your homesteading life; may you live long and happily.
I will use the toys while they exist. But I think being fully dependent on a system funded by Jew usury and dependent on long brittle supply chains, and rapidly depleting resources in an age of geopolitical instability is foolish.
Raven, did you read "The Grapes of Wrath"? Remember the Joad family got sacked by the installation of a tractor so that the big farm revolution could take place. Sharecroppers mostly went to the cities. IMHO, it was a primary reason for the Depression.
My point is that that period of time seems like the converse of what we are facing today. Are sharecroppers going to return to form the small farm revolution? Are the cities going to dump out their overpopulation onto the farmlands? Who is going to foot the bill for all this conversion?
Aha, you are thinking of Williamsburg again. That is what society was in colonial America. The guild system with masters and apprentices is still practiced in Williamsburg and products are manufactured one at a time and there was no mass production or assembly lines. Each rifle was an individual.
I agree with both of you, I think that is where we are heading which makes the skills base of Williamsburg vital for it skills base for the future.
In old England, it was considered gauche for a business to advertise. But then the you know whos got back in with the ascent of William of Orange. Then England began to sicken and die.
No one should be allowed to rule, except the people by and for themselves, under Mother Nature.
Representatives? Maybe sometimes, if legitimate and with the freedom to opt-out. Once you have absolute rulers, you're back to square one and the kinds of problems you may have been trying to get out of in the first place.
Why are we the people allowing the politicians and MSM to tell us what we can and cannot see and hear? This is the covid mode of operation. Hiding under a rock, or down in the basement, is not a qualification for leadership; but more likely a setup for a bunch of unelected globalists to run the affairs of state, while hiding behind the curtain.
2) Leadership that does not stand for scrutiny, or offers word salads as an explanation and does not cooperate, should be immediately dismissed.
3) Our representatives in government need to treat everyone with dignity and respect. No lining of pockets with donor or NGO funds, and no gaming the system to gain an advantage. Just focus on doing the job they are being paid to do. Represent us, the whole population.
I would suggest that this would disqualify many members in DC at this point in time. It would wipe the slate clean, and provide for a new mode of operation, since they have demonstrated that they are unfit to rule US.
A voice like Sidney Powell needs to be heard, not silenced.
What is the status of the first Trump assassination attempt? Who will stand for scrutiny, and tell us if the claim that audio of the event, that suggests that there was more than one initial shooter, is legit?
Who will stand for scrutiny, and tell us about the backroom deals that the likes of John Kerry have made with foreign governments on our behalf?
Well, 2025 or 2030, which shall it be? We will see who gets the driver’s seat soon. What do you believe about the state of understanding of the problems of the USA right now? Does anyone know for sure who is right or wrong? IMO, Nope.
Macgregor claims that the US encouraged the invasion of Lebanon, and is on autopilot in support of their military actions.
My read is that "Joe Biden's" mode of operation has been to try and bribe leadership throughout the world to embrace peace and the 2030 Agenda, which seems to be at odds with Macgregor's claim.
Could it be that the majority of US politicians, and possibly others like the King of Jordan, are bought and paid for by Israel, and essentially being blackmailed?
It appears that only a small percent comprehend the problems that the US is currently confronted with, and perhaps only a small percent of those are able to comprehend an unbiased objective assessment.
Thinking that Israel is solely to blame is not a sign of smarts. Definitely involved, trying to get the best deals, but not everything.
Who is Iran armed by? Russia. Who is Iran's historical enemy? Sunni Muslims, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. What organization does Iran belong to? BRICS+. How often has Iran attacked Israel directly with boots on the ground? Never. Nor Iraq. Always missiles. BFD. They are cowards like the USA, always looking for a way to shed the other guys blood. Always proxies. When are the proxies going to figure out that they are being used? I will include the Arabs and the UKES in that statement.
In giving this further consideration, I view "Joe Biden's" primary objective to be implementation of the 2030 Agenda. And if Iran does not want to cooperate in this endeavor, then "Joe Biden" will navigate the path that he feels is most beneficial to his agenda.
I am in agreement with Macgregor (vs Keane), and assess that the majority of the population of the world view themselves as victims of the US$ key currency in one fashion or another. I don't view the "proxies" as individuals that are being used, but individuals who view themselves as having been abused (either directly, indirectly, or their ancestors) by "Israel". Israel's current aggression, as supported and promoted by Keane, just creates more enemies (than they are killing) against Israel, as Macgregor eludes.
The BRICS+ is comprised of countries that view themselves as being/have been abused by the western world, and view this time as an opportunity to breakout from the oppression.
My bet is on Macgregor's assessment, that the West is going to loose the war if it proceeds as Keane advises.
Ultimately, the citizens of the world are going to support leadership/actions which they think best represents their individual interest.
Yo Jarek, you still haven't figured out that capitalism and "corporate personhood" AKA crony capitalists, or "Corporate Capitalists" as you like to call them, are completely different?
Greed drives the small to become medium sized, and the medium big, and the big into corporate giants. What could be simpler to understand? Men won't control themselves so someone else must do it.
What is your problem, woman? You want a simple answer. And the answer is simple but too close to home, i.e, human nature itself.
Uh huh, you just destroyed your own argument, Lugh.
Men won’t control themselves, so someone must do it. Right?
Your answer is some form of government. But one problem, government is comprised of men, just as subject to corruption as the corporate leaders.
The answer was and is, open markets where new business is being generated constantly to expand and put the older businesses out of business, continuous recycling. Second, ban lobbying of the government, consider it a bribe. Both are very much hard to do, but much better than government control.
So the answer is the Law of the Jungle, big eating small. That's what the market is, when left to itself. As the Alchemists said, Nature unaided, fails.
Yes!!!! Lugh, let me ask you. Who exactly would you want in place to control your life. Who would you want to tell you what to do if you owned a small business? Bill Gates? Kamala Harris? Rachel Maddow? Sean Hannity? You say you would want the government to control the crony corporations, I do not believe that. You want the same thing I do, for a system that controls itself, the free market. A system where folks get many choices and many chances to recovery from mistakes. You are not a socialist, you want to run your own life.
09/30/24: It's the same old pattern A) Feigning shock --- "How DARE you accuse of this!" Then, after their aberrant behavior through repetition has been normalized, B) "Yeah, that's who we are / what we did. UP YOURS!"
"Once in awhile the veil is lifted, and they bare their objectives for all the world to see." ~ Thomas
---
What 'veil'? Just look around and/or talk to any anarchist.
Cripes, they even spell it out in our art:
---
“Morpheus: 'The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work... when you go to church... when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo: 'What truth?'
Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison, for your mind.”
---
"Someone has written a book about the children and their need for their, just simply, emotional and mental development to have contact with the mountains, with the air, the sea, with the dawn, the sunset, the trees, the birds, the song of the birds. Children that don't have these experiences have no real idea of the world they live in. They live in a house, in a school, in a city that's all manufactured. And they begin to be progressively isolated from the basic dynamics of what human life is all about." ~ Thomas Berry
“It’s really hard to govern today. . . . The First Amendment stands as a major block.” Once in awhile the veil is lifted, and they bare their objectives for all the world to see. It doesn't happen very often - in fact it occurs very rarely. But when it does, it underscores all that their actions tell us about them. Absolute, unchallengeable power. Apart from the constructive abolition of the 1st Amendment, they must dilute the 2nd Amendment to the point where it's little more than words scratched on centuries old parchment. Then comes the liquidation of the undesirables a la the Khmer Rouge, Stalin, etc. etc. etc. This story is old, but each time it happens it is as though it had never happened before.
They mean rule, they dont want to govern, they want to be iron fisted rulers, to that i say they need an iron fisted smack to the head, literally
I would have said "upside" the head.
Would you be content useing copper & lead instead of iron?
That's going to hurt us more than them. I'd suggest our very own Ron Anselmo's throat-punch instead. Ron?
They've been whittling away at the 2nd amendment for years, a bump stock here, a large capacity magazine there, until now the government outguns the citizenry (and Joe sneeringly reminded us that they have F-16s).
The founders did #2 for two reasons:
1) To form a means of self-defense for the country and each state. A militia will be formed for protection and the people will be armed with weapons to do that protection. Even in the Civil war, states sent their militias to fight for the North and South, remember Chamberlain’s 20th Maine? Arms were guaranteed to each individual for use in the militia. One difference then is demonstrated in Williamsburg, the Armory where all weapons were stored that could not be stored at home. People needed arms for self-protection in those days just as today.
2) The main reason that Dem socialists want those guns, to enable Jefferson’s proclamation in the Declaration that it is the responsibility of a people to overthrow a bad overbearing government. Today’s Leftist Deep State IS a bad overbearing government. They want our guns and they do not give a shit about the Constitution.
Can’t believe I fell into this Cluster Fuck of a forum. Wake up people,your
Following AN EVIL LIAR!
*Founding Fathers
Founders is a feminist government word that cuts the balls off men it was men who made the declaration of independence, It was all men
Bullshit. John and Abigail Adams had the most romantic relationship and send each other beautiful letters. I don’t believe it about the misogyny. You are listening to a bunch of crappy propaganda from the government. Why would you trust them?
The founders were men of their times. The USA is where Blacks became free, and women got the vote and inhabit many governmental offices today. You America haters, especially from overseas can kiss my butt.
Once again...hello Tekapo. Still enjoying your crappy champagne on your so-called yacht?
my apology for asking if you had a firearm before knowing you're a kiwi - that's New Zealander, right? So, of course your options - like your opinions - are limited. And living in Seattle for 41 years explains much about your perception of America. You are incorrect in a great many of your assumptions, however your "views" of our country from across the ocean, in another hemisphere - are perhaps best kept in your own part of the world. And f.y.i. - it's "black powder" rifles or pistols. The gunshot victims your "doctor daughters" deal with, are likely due to "black powered" firearms.
you sure are sad in your attacks, kiwi (rhymes with "weewee"). And as for 'obnoxious', seems you have no other argument other than the superiority of N.Z. and it's folks. We saw how you let a horsefaced woman run your country during Covid, the lock downs and threats. Is that the "freedom" you spoke of. I can assure you that during my years in aviation, I have worked in far more states and countries than you have. I am certainly not "the most knowledgeable guy in the world" - I am, however, more intelligent than you. As for your "racist" comment, I am married to a native American woman; and bear no umbrage toward any race. My.statement about "black powered" weapons was because most shootings in cities nowadays are committed by young black men; that's just a fact. And, it was because apparently they don't teach proofreading over there.
Lovely country, by the way. I enjoyed it on each of my visits there. Sadly, though, it does have a few folks there pretty high on themselves; so much so that they will dump on a country that provided a decades long career. You're the "asshole"; "mate". Get over yourself.
You hate men. You hate Whites. You hate White men most of all.
Is that you kamellla?
Hey guess what, you can stuff that BULLschiTT
I WILL KEEP THEM FOREVER
Why? Go look at the FBI statistics on who is shooting the most people. Wake up.
course it matters you wake up!! People have to know information to defend themselves.
The government loves ignorant people who don’t pay attention to patterns. They love to blame people who are blameless. Blame the people who are actually shooting. Stop with the propaganda. The TV, media and government are fooling you.
The five cities in the USA that have the highest homicide rate are Chicago, Detroit, Wash.DC, St. Louis and New Orleans, They ALL have very strict gun control laws.
Your assertion is BS. Gun Control is not the answer. People control is always the answer. Guns do not pull their own triggers, people do. If guns are taken away, people will stab each other.
Dennis, you face the same dilemma that the politicians face, How do you convince PEOPLE not to kill each other? Gum control is not the answer. Precedent? Prohibition. Hey, maybe New Zealand’s solution is not to have two completely different peoples trying to live together, hating each other like Americans are doing now. Solution? Ban political parties and vote for the best guy. One of Mc Cains best ideas was to limit the amount of money afforded to political parties, especially from billionaires. When I think of all the good that could be done with the money wasted on TV political ads, it is disgusting.
One more, how come each of the school shootings are done by mental cases that are on FBI watch lists? My question is, why have the watch list if no one is going to do anything with the info? Also, IMO, precedent has been set here with two cases where the parents are being held to account for their children’s actions, a really good move.
See John’s perfect comments loser
dear Lord that's horrible information, Dennis! You don't own one, do you?
We've always had the 2nd amendment but we haven't always had a crime problem. It's corruption of the culture, not the guns per se. And of course, Blacks.
Wrong on all fronts as far as 2a goes typical Socialist idiot.
Oh, silly me saying idiot and Socialist is being redundant.
You have no business commenting on Americans right to bear arms and anything you say is opinion.
It's a right as expressed by our wonderful American Constitution nothing is changing that and unlike you, I have served in my countries military and continue to serve in a capacity even now.
You don't live here, nor do you understand what being an American is like.
As far as the other "insult" you already used that sorry one on Jarek in fact I would say it's probably some serious projection on your part matchstick man.
While we are at it the loudmouth Kiwi is resorting to insults and name calling while being a brave keyboard warrior himself. While attempting to say bad things about others bravery. Hypocrisy is very annoying, and the results make you look like a sad garden variety troll.
You still don't have a clue and I would lay money down that most of your post about working in the US is bullshit. Especially as a construction worker.
You shouldnt even own letter openers as you are too slow to comprehend actual statistics.
There was a Lib posting into JHK a few years ago with much of your belief system. I cannot remember his handle. Are you him?
From New Zealand
Dennis: if you remove the "inner city" (oops….a dog whistle according to Libs) statistics of violent assaults and homicides the USA is one of the LEAST violent countries in the world. Thank Diversity & Cultural Enrichment for the high firearm misuse.
True. Of what use are fighter and bomber aircraft in a Civil War fought in your country on territory you must preserve in order to prosper? Will a military of volunteers from your own citizens violently suppress the rebels who may be family & friends?
If the Progressive Elites want a violent confrontation with the Citizens, let them be first to arms and out front in battle.
There are other ways to pizz in their cheerios that will be more effective
Then they probably still won't understand or appreciate guerrilla warfare, with internal being the worst.
The planes have to land and pilots eat eventually and to know and interact with others, like on the ground.
That's in large part why civs collapse probably. Because they have the worst of a relatively small set of people slippy-sloping progressively upward on high horses-- apparently like that 'haircut-in-search-of-a-conscience/brain'-- who seem to think that it's their rules (AKA, 'The Law', as if it's immutable like the laws of physics) or the highway.
No it's not the law. It never was and never will be, not for long, anyway.
The only law that matters is Mother Nature's.
Brother Nature?
How about just nature's?
The last time I checked, Joe Biden doesn’t know how to fly and F-16, doubtful he knows how to fly a kite for that matter, besides living on a beach where kite flying is fun. I digress, he doesn’t know that Dr. Jill doesn’t know that the septic truck that pumps human waste from Air Force One is NOT the Jet A fuel truck, and imagine Hunter pulling the flags and pins out of the 500 pound ordinance under the wings…exactly not going to happen. (Can you see ole Hunter on the CVN Gerald Ford heaving deck trying to pull the pins? Hmmm, that might be worth some money spent to witness.) No they don’t get that Charlie is out here in the bush, we starve but squat and get stronger, insurgents work that way, they get hungry and more determined, ever meet an angry insurgent, likely you won’t, but try torturing one. You won’t get far. That is what all these midwits miss, all around them are insurgents, they don’t see it, the same way the brass in Saigon, Baghdad and Kabul didn’t see it, but they are there, living and biding their time. John Forbes “Live shot” Kerry likely has an IQ of around 100, just smart enough to be identified as not hopelessly dumb, but really dumb. Prep school, Yale, a path parted for him by wealth, never challenged and allowed to run untethered from reality his whole life and especially as Secretary of State, he got away with it. He reminds one of the kid in your class at (name the prep school) who is still angry he was not voted student head of the school, lost by a whisker if you ask him, but actually because he was a brown nosing snitch the student body hated his ass and didn’t vote for him…go figure 80 years old and still angry, not a good way to be, thieving everyone’s oxygen with his prattle. All revolutions end the same, not with a bang but whimper. One can ask what happens with the USA and its revolution, it was a divorce so doesn’t count…unless it continues and those pressing the dialectic prevail. My money is on the insurgents. May take a while, but it worked in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan as example….
Thomas, I’d say they’ve been very open about what’s in store for us since 2020, almost mocking us to be able to do anything about it
There's a school of thought that the dark cult telegraphs its intentions. If nothing is done about it, they earn a karmic 'get-out-of-jail-free' card.
Exactly. That is a Satanist thing.
In a different way, Macron lifted the veil in 2022 when he cited '... the end of abundance'.
That's the very same issue that JHK referred to in his book 'The Long Emergency' (2005).
Clearly at least one person in France who's advising Macron understands that 1) fossil fuels are the lifeblood of industrial society 2) they're not infinite and 3) 'Limits to Growth' was broadly correct. Some in the US deep state realise too, read 'The Last Oil Shock' (2007).
A very perceptive observation!
If we look at the WEF, UN, etc, policies, we see a common thread - a response to over-population and financial collapse in the context of depleting and degraded resources, principally oil,coal and gas, but also all ores and minerals.
It's all about the rationing of energy and resources. And of life itself.
Exactly. They are right about many things. But their response is to try and power down the World while staying at the top - at the expense of all humanity. Thus they must be destroyed. Alas those that fight them deny the truths they believe in because they believe in them.
Figures in an Oxfam report suggested that if billionaires and multi-millionaires could live more modestly - maybe more like 'mere' millionaires - global GHG emissions could fall 30-40%.
See: https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/carbon-emissions-richest-1-percent-more-double-emissions-poorest-half-humanity
I'm not holding my breath because most billonaires seem to think differently from 'normal' people. Warren Buffett was considered unusual in the past because he lived in a typical suburban house, not in a mansion.
George Bush 41 laughingly referred to Bill Clinton and Al Gore as "Bozo and Ozone" (they had the last laugh on him, though, as the election turned out), but "The Inconvenient Truth" about Gore is that he a 24 karat phony when it comes to environmentalism and "decarbonizing" the economy, living in a 50,000 sq ft mansion and crisscrossing the nation in his ozone-depleting private jet.
It would help, for a start to select candidates who were known for operating successful businesses but lived modestly, such as Ron Paul, or Sam Walton (even the big city Chicago boss Richard Daley was known to have lived in a modest home.) This would also exclude gluttons like New Jersey's Chris ("Crisco") Christy.
A very perceptive thread, thanks.
Yes, Lugh, add on the fact that those PTB want to change things so that you and I take the hit and not them. That is why they need to be torn down from their perches. Now who is the better candidate to tear them down?
Xavier, very good. One thing though is that change of how mankind does its business HAS to happen, the whole debate depends on how it will be done, the hard way (war etc.) or an easy way (adaptation). So far, economic and physical war seems to be the sole way.
It's probably a good idea to vote for Trump to buy us time, but to see him as your lord and savior is just ludicrous. At the end of the day he is just another Jew tool in the ZOG.
He definitely isn't a saviour. The US is at the end of a phase and will have to reinvent itself. Will that be in a positive or negative way?
America's probably too big. The admin of a large enough land area-- the projection of power-- takes energy and we're past peak oil. Nuclear? So-called renewable? Unsure, but, frankly, I hope not. Otherwise, the power elite may have us by the balls, like for a longer time.
So, one moral of the story might be, 'careful what you wish for'.
No, Mr. Gore, Mr. Kerry, and all other Ds. We are in no way deficient in fossil fuels or energy generating capabilities in the USA.
We are hobbled by the lies of globalists and a desire to destroy the strength and cohesion of the USA.
America will survive the United States.
Did Rome have a version 2.0? Before you answer; spiritual or political? America is the spiritual, USA is political.
Yes.
Ugg! Mr Raven is Mr Nasty POS
Yes the mass murder of women and children in Gaza supported by all these assholes is so beautiful isn't it? And certainly worth funding above the needs of our citizens who paid the taxes in the first place. So forgive me if I find your juvenile substance free venting to be beneath contempt
She is the one who is the POS
What are you talking about? He is always all right and you are always wrong.
Blah blah h blah. No back to sleep
Why isn't there a (inter)national discussion about this?
If you go on the site RT you will find people from every country
What percent of the general population have a clue about the 2030 Agenda, and "Joe Biden" being "committed to the full implementation of 2030 Agenda and the SDGs, at home and abroad"?
What percent of the US population view and believe anything that is promoted on the RT site?
Good questions! I hope more and more every day. that’s why I come on Substack to find out what’s going on and let people know , as many as possible
If there were a (inter)national discussion about this, it would highlight the fact that the existing format for life is nothing more than a flawed game, and then that would beg the question: What should be the qualifications for leadership to navigate the world out of the current predicament?
And then that would lead to the question: What if a nation like Russia does not want to share its resources with the rest of the world, including future generations? Could it be that is what the conflict in Ukraine is all about?
And what about Xi's vision for China being the center of the world. Does that mean that Xi will dominate the 2030 agenda, and essentially be the de facto leadership to navigate the world out of the current predicament?
Will the voice of the population count for anything? Will the NWO leadership be accountable to anyone?
If the existing format for life is nothing more than a flawed game, then who gets to keep what?
Sure looks like the world needs conflict to create an opportunity for someone to grab the power and declare de facto leadership.
Xi Van Fleet lived through such a time, and has been sounding the alarm that similar circumstances that lead up to Mao's power grab in China, have been happening in the US today.
Yes, what stops the military from joining the Deep State and its MIC and just taking over? No more democracy?
Power in the hands of DEI, and we wind up with products like Walz.
Therefore Corporate Capitalists cannot be allowed to rule. Resources must be carefully marshalled, not squandered for profit or in frivolous pursuits. How did this jibe with Americanism? It doesn't.
There is an American way to handle a transition to a less energy intensive society though, and that's a return to the society of the founders with yeoman family farms, and more local craft oriented enterprises making high quality items that can be maintained and even passed down the generations. My hope would be we can at least maintain some benefits of modernity like CNC machines, but the future is local.
I am all for the yeoman farms and small business/craft-oriented society you describe, but I fear this is a pipe dream. We are no longer Hobbits, isolated from those around us in The Shire. Even when Tolkien was writing about that idyllic world, it was already over, something he tacitly acknowledged. Supporting ourselves on our own parcel of farmland sounds very appealing, but it takes but one bad crop year, one summer of drought or torrential spring rain to annihilate any hopes of succeeding in that endeavor. To be honest, we need abundant available energy to survive. Without energy to power our society, we are doomed to live in a Hobbesian world. With sufficient energy, everyone benefits. We don't have to burn our forests to stay warm as before, nor do we need to mine coal, as alternative sources like natural gas are so abundant. Advances in safe nuclear power generation are already available and, unless the luddites among us prevail, will be coming on line soon enough. Our problem is not too much energy; it is not enough. Oh, and also too many politicians whose goal is to gather as much power as we allow them to have unto themselves at our expense.
The entire national- and world- manufacturing order is thrown into disarray by the imposition of different sets of rules. One reason that natural gas currently trades for one quarter of its former high (under $3/mcf vs $13+) is, even though it is massively cleaner burning than coal, that it is being demonized in the U.S. as "contributing to global warming," even as massively polluted(the joke is that their national bird is the looney) China continues to ADD coal-burning plants- and is accorded Most Favorable Nation status when it comes to exporting its products more cheaply, costing jobs elsewhere. Yet, ironically, their efforts to reduce pollution in their major cities is the driving reason for their emphasis on EV's, which are helping destroy both European and American car makers(See today's Stellantis news) who cannot compete except with big tariffs
"[China's] efforts to reduce pollution in their major cities is the driving reason for their emphasis on EV's"
No.
China makes EVs because they believe the rest of the world will buy EVs instead of ICE vehicles, due to the Globalist policies which outsourced manufacturing to China. China discovered they can make EVs cheaply, and the trend was born.
Caveat Emptor if you buy a Chinese made vehicle or a vehicle with extensive China-manufactured parts.
Well I living in a homestead myself, so like Johnson kicking the rock as evidence of its real existence, I refute you thus. Clearly you haven't recovered enough from being a lawyer.
I admire and envy your independence. However, you are availing yourself of the internet to respond to me only because there is sufficient energy to power its myriad servers, etc. And unless you are Amish, I assume you use gasoline/diesel-powered equipment like chainsaws, tractors, etc. and have electricity to power your lights as well as your computer and an internet connection. (If you are Amish, a population with which I am intimately familiar, that is a different situation. And shame on you for using the internet like the English!) That was my point; we do not live in Eighteenth Century Colonial Williamsburg. Nor, for that matter, do most of us even live like Sean James, whose "My Self Reliance" podcast I enjoy immensely, but who still is reliant on "civilization" for much of his substance. I am glad we still have pockets of such pre-industrial lifestyles with their tried and true means of existence and perhaps things may unravel to the point where we all are compelled to live like that again, but I pray not. (Should that become necessary, you certainly have a leg up on the likes of me.) However, I prefer that life be not poor, nasty, brutish and short. I like painless dentistry, anesthesia for surgery and antibiotics to treat infections that, in those halcyon days of our yeoman farmer ancestors frequently killed their victims. Not to mention the ability to travel to the dentist, hospital or pharmacy to obtain such goods and services. Nonetheless, best of luck with your homesteading life; may you live long and happily.
I will use the toys while they exist. But I think being fully dependent on a system funded by Jew usury and dependent on long brittle supply chains, and rapidly depleting resources in an age of geopolitical instability is foolish.
Raven, did you read "The Grapes of Wrath"? Remember the Joad family got sacked by the installation of a tractor so that the big farm revolution could take place. Sharecroppers mostly went to the cities. IMHO, it was a primary reason for the Depression.
My point is that that period of time seems like the converse of what we are facing today. Are sharecroppers going to return to form the small farm revolution? Are the cities going to dump out their overpopulation onto the farmlands? Who is going to foot the bill for all this conversion?
We’ll probably have to do it ourselves, the Jews who are robbing us, aren’t giving anything back for free.
Aha, you are thinking of Williamsburg again. That is what society was in colonial America. The guild system with masters and apprentices is still practiced in Williamsburg and products are manufactured one at a time and there was no mass production or assembly lines. Each rifle was an individual.
I agree with both of you, I think that is where we are heading which makes the skills base of Williamsburg vital for it skills base for the future.
In old England, it was considered gauche for a business to advertise. But then the you know whos got back in with the ascent of William of Orange. Then England began to sicken and die.
I have an essay on that.
https://substack.com/@whispertrees/p-144571152
You might call it A World Made by Hand.....
Williamsburg!
Yep why do you think I read JHK despite disagreeing with his Zionism vehemently, or make art like this? Which you can buy BTW...
https://substack.com/@whispertrees/p-148701852
My thoughts are that "the future is local" doesn't take into consideration an international perspective.
Do you anticipate the international horde will be respectful this time?
They will have a tough time getting here when the gas runs out.
I anticipate there will be gas for their tank, but not for ours.
Without a system of maintenance, like replacement parts complex machines break, a very brittle authoritarian system.
No one should be allowed to rule, except the people by and for themselves, under Mother Nature.
Representatives? Maybe sometimes, if legitimate and with the freedom to opt-out. Once you have absolute rulers, you're back to square one and the kinds of problems you may have been trying to get out of in the first place.
In the present case of America, how do you see this functioning with a polarized population?
What should be the qualifications to rule? Does any part of the 2030 Agenda qualify? Would Putin or Xi qualify? How would bad leadership be removed?
Who would be in charge of dealing with a nation that squandered resources for profit or in frivolous pursuits?
The following are a few proposals:
1) Leadership should stand for scrutiny.
Why are we the people allowing the politicians and MSM to tell us what we can and cannot see and hear? This is the covid mode of operation. Hiding under a rock, or down in the basement, is not a qualification for leadership; but more likely a setup for a bunch of unelected globalists to run the affairs of state, while hiding behind the curtain.
2) Leadership that does not stand for scrutiny, or offers word salads as an explanation and does not cooperate, should be immediately dismissed.
3) Our representatives in government need to treat everyone with dignity and respect. No lining of pockets with donor or NGO funds, and no gaming the system to gain an advantage. Just focus on doing the job they are being paid to do. Represent us, the whole population.
I would suggest that this would disqualify many members in DC at this point in time. It would wipe the slate clean, and provide for a new mode of operation, since they have demonstrated that they are unfit to rule US.
A voice like Sidney Powell needs to be heard, not silenced.
What is the status of the first Trump assassination attempt? Who will stand for scrutiny, and tell us if the claim that audio of the event, that suggests that there was more than one initial shooter, is legit?
Who will stand for scrutiny, and tell us about the backroom deals that the likes of John Kerry have made with foreign governments on our behalf?
Well, 2025 or 2030, which shall it be? We will see who gets the driver’s seat soon. What do you believe about the state of understanding of the problems of the USA right now? Does anyone know for sure who is right or wrong? IMO, Nope.
Macgregor claims that the US encouraged the invasion of Lebanon, and is on autopilot in support of their military actions.
My read is that "Joe Biden's" mode of operation has been to try and bribe leadership throughout the world to embrace peace and the 2030 Agenda, which seems to be at odds with Macgregor's claim.
Could it be that the majority of US politicians, and possibly others like the King of Jordan, are bought and paid for by Israel, and essentially being blackmailed?
It appears that only a small percent comprehend the problems that the US is currently confronted with, and perhaps only a small percent of those are able to comprehend an unbiased objective assessment.
Thinking that Israel is solely to blame is not a sign of smarts. Definitely involved, trying to get the best deals, but not everything.
Who is Iran armed by? Russia. Who is Iran's historical enemy? Sunni Muslims, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. What organization does Iran belong to? BRICS+. How often has Iran attacked Israel directly with boots on the ground? Never. Nor Iraq. Always missiles. BFD. They are cowards like the USA, always looking for a way to shed the other guys blood. Always proxies. When are the proxies going to figure out that they are being used? I will include the Arabs and the UKES in that statement.
In giving this further consideration, I view "Joe Biden's" primary objective to be implementation of the 2030 Agenda. And if Iran does not want to cooperate in this endeavor, then "Joe Biden" will navigate the path that he feels is most beneficial to his agenda.
I am in agreement with Macgregor (vs Keane), and assess that the majority of the population of the world view themselves as victims of the US$ key currency in one fashion or another. I don't view the "proxies" as individuals that are being used, but individuals who view themselves as having been abused (either directly, indirectly, or their ancestors) by "Israel". Israel's current aggression, as supported and promoted by Keane, just creates more enemies (than they are killing) against Israel, as Macgregor eludes.
The BRICS+ is comprised of countries that view themselves as being/have been abused by the western world, and view this time as an opportunity to breakout from the oppression.
My bet is on Macgregor's assessment, that the West is going to loose the war if it proceeds as Keane advises.
Ultimately, the citizens of the world are going to support leadership/actions which they think best represents their individual interest.
Yo Jarek, you still haven't figured out that capitalism and "corporate personhood" AKA crony capitalists, or "Corporate Capitalists" as you like to call them, are completely different?
When will you learn?
Greed drives the small to become medium sized, and the medium big, and the big into corporate giants. What could be simpler to understand? Men won't control themselves so someone else must do it.
What is your problem, woman? You want a simple answer. And the answer is simple but too close to home, i.e, human nature itself.
Uh huh, you just destroyed your own argument, Lugh.
Men won’t control themselves, so someone must do it. Right?
Your answer is some form of government. But one problem, government is comprised of men, just as subject to corruption as the corporate leaders.
The answer was and is, open markets where new business is being generated constantly to expand and put the older businesses out of business, continuous recycling. Second, ban lobbying of the government, consider it a bribe. Both are very much hard to do, but much better than government control.
So the answer is the Law of the Jungle, big eating small. That's what the market is, when left to itself. As the Alchemists said, Nature unaided, fails.
You still refuse to recognise the difference between capitalism and "corporate personhood"/AKA "crony capitalism."
Please, even a brief scan of even such a pathetic site as Wiki will tell you this.
Your know-it-all arrogance bores me.
Yes!!!! Lugh, let me ask you. Who exactly would you want in place to control your life. Who would you want to tell you what to do if you owned a small business? Bill Gates? Kamala Harris? Rachel Maddow? Sean Hannity? You say you would want the government to control the crony corporations, I do not believe that. You want the same thing I do, for a system that controls itself, the free market. A system where folks get many choices and many chances to recovery from mistakes. You are not a socialist, you want to run your own life.
I wouldn't be so sure about J-Rod not being a socialist, JAZ.
He talks big about National Socialism, but would want to be one of the Elite, not one of the serfs.
09/30/24: It's the same old pattern A) Feigning shock --- "How DARE you accuse of this!" Then, after their aberrant behavior through repetition has been normalized, B) "Yeah, that's who we are / what we did. UP YOURS!"
~ The Matrix Is A Plato's Cave Remake ~
---
"Once in awhile the veil is lifted, and they bare their objectives for all the world to see." ~ Thomas
---
What 'veil'? Just look around and/or talk to any anarchist.
Cripes, they even spell it out in our art:
---
“Morpheus: 'The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work... when you go to church... when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo: 'What truth?'
Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison, for your mind.”
---
"Someone has written a book about the children and their need for their, just simply, emotional and mental development to have contact with the mountains, with the air, the sea, with the dawn, the sunset, the trees, the birds, the song of the birds. Children that don't have these experiences have no real idea of the world they live in. They live in a house, in a school, in a city that's all manufactured. And they begin to be progressively isolated from the basic dynamics of what human life is all about." ~ Thomas Berry
---
Another Brick In The Wall
https://youtu.be/qs35t2xFqdU?si=8cl9khIp9Fh5oXc3
---
Monkman's The Scream
https://i.cbc.ca/1.3950592.1485294885!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_1180/the-scream-by-kent-monkman.jpg