Oh dear, Dennis. You never can argue a point. And, because of that, you waste my time.
(1) 'Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists?'
Where did I say I was arguing for the existence of a creator? I don't argue about such things as I've said multiple times that intellectual argument on that topic is a waste of everyone's time. I m…
Oh dear, Dennis. You never can argue a point. And, because of that, you waste my time.
(1) 'Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists?'
Where did I say I was arguing for the existence of a creator? I don't argue about such things as I've said multiple times that intellectual argument on that topic is a waste of everyone's time. I merely said if YOU think you can resolve the issue in that way, then go ahead and do it (but I didn't, notably, tell you to STFU if you couldn't, because I am not like you). I was also pointing out the silliness of your demand that I should write a thesis, when the proof of vaccine damage already exists. Why re-invent the wheel? I also already directed you in a prevous post to the Substacks of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, which are essential to understanding the nefarious means by which the US Government has implemented its vaccination programme. Similar laws exist elsewhere.
(2) I did not say you do not have the right to bore everyone to tears with your obsession either. You clearly have that right, even though your tedious, repetitive copy-pasting does not appear to have the slightest effect on anyone's beliefs. Rather, no-one 'likes' those posts and no-one bothers arguing with them either. So, basically, you're talking to yourself, which you have the right to do, if you like wasting your time.
(3) I have not besmirched your daughters. I have asked you to point out to them, if they are not aware, that unvaccinated children do not suffer from the plethora of chronic conditions from which vaccinated children suffer (which makes a fortune for the medico-pharma cartel); nor do they tend to die of SIDS, which mostly happens shortly after vaccination. (Incidentally I consider it helpful to point this out generally as there may be someone on here who then goes off and does their own research, which may save a child from the Russian roulette of vaccination - why would that effort not be worthy?)
If your dauighters already know that, say, more children are harmed by MMR than by actual measles, then you just need to say that. If they don't know, then rather than 'besmirching' them, I am potentially providing a public service to their patients through their surely caring father who would not want them to find out another way, e.g. by a lawsuit from a patient's parents.
Your position seems to be:
I Dennis Merwood, may call people stupid and I may write tedious, repetitive posts regarding my personal obsession about other people's beliefs, but no-one may respond unless they wish to engage in a stupid to-and-fro that simply cannot be resolved by intellectual argument. If they point out anything else (e.g. that there is some irony in the fact that vaccination is a religion more than it is a science, given my MO), they will be told to STFU by a person who, with further irony, claims not to like any kind of reflections to be made on himself or the well known issues which everyone is aware of regarding the medico-pharma cartel.
Your daughters may be lovely human beings, Dennis, in which case, if they don't already know what I've told you, they should, logically, be grateful to be told. Doctors don't study vaccination at medical school, as I've already pointed out. They are just given a vaccination schedule and told to get on with it and not question it. Meanwhile, with every increase in the number of shots (currently around 80 in the US) chronic conditions like autism skyrocket.
Finally, Dennis my dear, you ask if I don't have something better to do. Pots-kettles, Dennis. We may all, including you and I, spend our time doing as we wish.
Oh dear, Dennis. You never can argue a point. And, because of that, you waste my time.
(1) 'Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists?'
Where did I say I was arguing for the existence of a creator? I don't argue about such things as I've said multiple times that intellectual argument on that topic is a waste of everyone's time. I merely said if YOU think you can resolve the issue in that way, then go ahead and do it (but I didn't, notably, tell you to STFU if you couldn't, because I am not like you). I was also pointing out the silliness of your demand that I should write a thesis, when the proof of vaccine damage already exists. Why re-invent the wheel? I also already directed you in a prevous post to the Substacks of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, which are essential to understanding the nefarious means by which the US Government has implemented its vaccination programme. Similar laws exist elsewhere.
(2) I did not say you do not have the right to bore everyone to tears with your obsession either. You clearly have that right, even though your tedious, repetitive copy-pasting does not appear to have the slightest effect on anyone's beliefs. Rather, no-one 'likes' those posts and no-one bothers arguing with them either. So, basically, you're talking to yourself, which you have the right to do, if you like wasting your time.
(3) I have not besmirched your daughters. I have asked you to point out to them, if they are not aware, that unvaccinated children do not suffer from the plethora of chronic conditions from which vaccinated children suffer (which makes a fortune for the medico-pharma cartel); nor do they tend to die of SIDS, which mostly happens shortly after vaccination. (Incidentally I consider it helpful to point this out generally as there may be someone on here who then goes off and does their own research, which may save a child from the Russian roulette of vaccination - why would that effort not be worthy?)
If your dauighters already know that, say, more children are harmed by MMR than by actual measles, then you just need to say that. If they don't know, then rather than 'besmirching' them, I am potentially providing a public service to their patients through their surely caring father who would not want them to find out another way, e.g. by a lawsuit from a patient's parents.
Your position seems to be:
I Dennis Merwood, may call people stupid and I may write tedious, repetitive posts regarding my personal obsession about other people's beliefs, but no-one may respond unless they wish to engage in a stupid to-and-fro that simply cannot be resolved by intellectual argument. If they point out anything else (e.g. that there is some irony in the fact that vaccination is a religion more than it is a science, given my MO), they will be told to STFU by a person who, with further irony, claims not to like any kind of reflections to be made on himself or the well known issues which everyone is aware of regarding the medico-pharma cartel.
Your daughters may be lovely human beings, Dennis, in which case, if they don't already know what I've told you, they should, logically, be grateful to be told. Doctors don't study vaccination at medical school, as I've already pointed out. They are just given a vaccination schedule and told to get on with it and not question it. Meanwhile, with every increase in the number of shots (currently around 80 in the US) chronic conditions like autism skyrocket.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dissolving-Illusions-Vaccines-Forgotten-Anniversary/dp/B0CZ61XLXH/ref=sr_1_1
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/B0D8K3X3RV/ref=sr_1_1
https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/sasha-latypova-its-literally-impossible
Finally, Dennis my dear, you ask if I don't have something better to do. Pots-kettles, Dennis. We may all, including you and I, spend our time doing as we wish.