Yeah, I saw a Scott Ritter interview recently - don't remember where - where he suddenly diverged into this white-guilt mea culpa. It seemed rehearsed to me, more polished than his usual answers to questions, such as on "Judging Freedom". I wondered what was up and assumed he was under some kind of pressure for appearing Rayciss. He has …
Yeah, I saw a Scott Ritter interview recently - don't remember where - where he suddenly diverged into this white-guilt mea culpa. It seemed rehearsed to me, more polished than his usual answers to questions, such as on "Judging Freedom". I wondered what was up and assumed he was under some kind of pressure for appearing Rayciss. He has been subject to attempted erasure for awhile. But I think his position on Iran is well-considered: it is not a simple "yes/no" decision for Iran to move forward on nuclear weapons development. This is, in my opinion, Scott Ritter's specialty. Whining about "white privilege"? An aberration in a field in which I don't look to Scott Ritter for an informed opinion.
Centralization vs. decentralization: It appears to me that the momentum is with centralization. They have the money, more every year. They have the power, more every year. I don't see a crash of civilization in the (near) future, I see a controlled demolition, with our masters standing atop the heap of rubble when the dust settles. Rubble for us, unparalleled wealth and power for them.
He's intelligent but he's also the manic fat guy type who often believes what he wants to believe. Like, "Hezbollah can take Northern Israel anytime it wants." Or his complete confidence that the Assad was going to crush the Sunni insurgents days before Syria collapsed and he fled.
Yeah, I saw a Scott Ritter interview recently - don't remember where - where he suddenly diverged into this white-guilt mea culpa. It seemed rehearsed to me, more polished than his usual answers to questions, such as on "Judging Freedom". I wondered what was up and assumed he was under some kind of pressure for appearing Rayciss. He has been subject to attempted erasure for awhile. But I think his position on Iran is well-considered: it is not a simple "yes/no" decision for Iran to move forward on nuclear weapons development. This is, in my opinion, Scott Ritter's specialty. Whining about "white privilege"? An aberration in a field in which I don't look to Scott Ritter for an informed opinion.
Centralization vs. decentralization: It appears to me that the momentum is with centralization. They have the money, more every year. They have the power, more every year. I don't see a crash of civilization in the (near) future, I see a controlled demolition, with our masters standing atop the heap of rubble when the dust settles. Rubble for us, unparalleled wealth and power for them.
But I hope you are right.
He's intelligent but he's also the manic fat guy type who often believes what he wants to believe. Like, "Hezbollah can take Northern Israel anytime it wants." Or his complete confidence that the Assad was going to crush the Sunni insurgents days before Syria collapsed and he fled.