And while you’re at it, let’s get away from all those pharmaceuticals and back to basics - good clean wholesome food, good work, water, exercise, rest, and above all, love of God, the truth and neighbor.
And while you’re at it, let’s get away from all those pharmaceuticals and back to basics - good clean wholesome food, good work, water, exercise, rest, and above all, love of God, the truth and neighbor.
That is the only way to make the best choices for ourselves, as well as our society.
Religious belief systems introduce UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS and take us away from the path to Truth, robbing us of the ability to make the best decisions in our lives.
"Religious belief systems introduce UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS and take us away from the path to Truth, robbing us of the ability to make the best decisions in our lives."
Perhaps you could tell your paediatrician daughters exactly that about the stuff they're injecting into entirely helpless little children, Dennis. Vaccination is a cult and a psyop, Dennis, not a science. If you can't question it, it is BY DEFINITION not science. Present an argument against that point if you feel up to it.
No matter the subject you became apoplectic about vaccinations!
You get all nasty and insulting to me about my paediatric doctor daughters who you don't even know and haven't ever met. You have no idea on their thoughts on vaccinations. Implying they are bad pediatricians injecting stuff into entirely helpless little children.
I'd appreciate it if you lay off this! It's not a good look my dear. You are coming off as a bit of a nut case.
"Vaccination is a cult and a psyop not a science". OK write your paper, have it peer reviewed and published, and go collect your Nobel Prize.
Dennis, my dear, do provide some evidence of apoplexy. I merely responded to one of your endless, endless, endless, tedious responses to anyone who mentions religion. I haven't insulted your daughters, Dennis, I'm suggesting you help them to the truth, since you've just claimed it's so important to you. You insult people every time you're on here, Dennis, my dear. You keep mentioning that religious people are 'just a bit stupid'. How many times have you said that? Why are your insults OK, but everyone must tread on eggshells around you?
I don't think you should be telling people on a free space, where freedom of speech is a thing, to STFU, Dennis. I think maybe you should go and write your paper proving that there is no Creator and have it peer reviewed, then go and collect your Nobel Prize for Logic or whatever. Because at the moment, your logic is not quite there. But I'm not going to tell you to STFU, because you are free to write your endless, endless, endless, tedious ripostes to every mention of religion, and copy-paste the same stuff over and over and over and over again, as long as the owner of the blog is happy for you to do it. It's just that people do have every right to respond to your responses. See how it works, Dennis, my dear?
Interestingly, the first half of your diatribe is trying to suggest that maybe your daughters don't vaccinate children, but the end of your diatribe is suggesting there is no evidence that vaccines do any harm. Again, clarity is always helpful.
PS I also might mention that your 'no matter what the subject' is a bit out of place since we have had exactly two exchanges about vaccines and paediatricians. Both were occasioned by your tedious remarks about religion. Maybe you should think more about why, since literally everyone knows your views on religion because you repeat them ad nauseam to no possible effect whatsoever, you continue to wax 'apoplectic' about other people's personal beliefs with which you are bizarrely and unhealthily obsessed.
If posters want to endlessly and tediously post religion claims in this thread with no evidence, I have every right to respond to them until JHK bans me.
I don't mock people for being religious. I do however mock those for thinking their personal religion is exempt from mockery.
I merely point out the fallaciousness of their claims. If that offends anyone, that is their problem not mine. They are perfectly free to make their counterarguments. They never do, but resort to rubbishing your character
BTW, the burden of proof that there is a creator falls on those that claim there is one. It's nothing to do with logic my dear. It's a matter of epistemology; the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion. Something you don't have a clue about. Whether it's with respect to religion or vaccinations.
And by the way, besmirching my daughters, neither of whom you know, and dragging them through the mud suggesting they are guilty of malpractice, is very low class. As is implying that I know there is evidence that vaccines do no harm. I leave that question to educated doctors, not uneducated keyboard warriors like you.
I just love getting told I'm a liar by someone I never met.
You are not going to get away with that my dear.
“No amount of belief makes something true.” - James Randi
Read your latest post again! Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists? Or any evidence supporting your wild claim that vaccinating kids does more harm than good? Of course you don't. You don't have any, so you just resort to bashing me and my posts.
Oh dear, Dennis. You never can argue a point. And, because of that, you waste my time.
(1) 'Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists?'
Where did I say I was arguing for the existence of a creator? I don't argue about such things as I've said multiple times that intellectual argument on that topic is a waste of everyone's time. I merely said if YOU think you can resolve the issue in that way, then go ahead and do it (but I didn't, notably, tell you to STFU if you couldn't, because I am not like you). I was also pointing out the silliness of your demand that I should write a thesis, when the proof of vaccine damage already exists. Why re-invent the wheel? I also already directed you in a prevous post to the Substacks of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, which are essential to understanding the nefarious means by which the US Government has implemented its vaccination programme. Similar laws exist elsewhere.
(2) I did not say you do not have the right to bore everyone to tears with your obsession either. You clearly have that right, even though your tedious, repetitive copy-pasting does not appear to have the slightest effect on anyone's beliefs. Rather, no-one 'likes' those posts and no-one bothers arguing with them either. So, basically, you're talking to yourself, which you have the right to do, if you like wasting your time.
(3) I have not besmirched your daughters. I have asked you to point out to them, if they are not aware, that unvaccinated children do not suffer from the plethora of chronic conditions from which vaccinated children suffer (which makes a fortune for the medico-pharma cartel); nor do they tend to die of SIDS, which mostly happens shortly after vaccination. (Incidentally I consider it helpful to point this out generally as there may be someone on here who then goes off and does their own research, which may save a child from the Russian roulette of vaccination - why would that effort not be worthy?)
If your dauighters already know that, say, more children are harmed by MMR than by actual measles, then you just need to say that. If they don't know, then rather than 'besmirching' them, I am potentially providing a public service to their patients through their surely caring father who would not want them to find out another way, e.g. by a lawsuit from a patient's parents.
Your position seems to be:
I Dennis Merwood, may call people stupid and I may write tedious, repetitive posts regarding my personal obsession about other people's beliefs, but no-one may respond unless they wish to engage in a stupid to-and-fro that simply cannot be resolved by intellectual argument. If they point out anything else (e.g. that there is some irony in the fact that vaccination is a religion more than it is a science, given my MO), they will be told to STFU by a person who, with further irony, claims not to like any kind of reflections to be made on himself or the well known issues which everyone is aware of regarding the medico-pharma cartel.
Your daughters may be lovely human beings, Dennis, in which case, if they don't already know what I've told you, they should, logically, be grateful to be told. Doctors don't study vaccination at medical school, as I've already pointed out. They are just given a vaccination schedule and told to get on with it and not question it. Meanwhile, with every increase in the number of shots (currently around 80 in the US) chronic conditions like autism skyrocket.
Finally, Dennis my dear, you ask if I don't have something better to do. Pots-kettles, Dennis. We may all, including you and I, spend our time doing as we wish.
And while you’re at it, let’s get away from all those pharmaceuticals and back to basics - good clean wholesome food, good work, water, exercise, rest, and above all, love of God, the truth and neighbor.
Yes, real patriotism. Make AIPAC register as a foreign lobby.
Or just ban them outright.
Good with both and BAN all foreign lobbyists.
Ban AIPAC? Ban dual citizenship?
Can we go back and restore South Africa and Rhodesia, based on Israel's subterfuge of those states? Ethnostate for me but not for thee?
Can we go back to pre-1930 America before rootless cosmopolites destroyed it?
Allah, Zeus, Yahweh or Thor, Paul?
For me, the bottom line is always the Truth.
The question must always be..... Is it True?
That is the only way to make the best choices for ourselves, as well as our society.
Religious belief systems introduce UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS and take us away from the path to Truth, robbing us of the ability to make the best decisions in our lives.
I never mentioned religion and am not referring to any. Jesus Christ is the Truth, and you not only don't know Him, you despise Him.
"Religious belief systems introduce UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS and take us away from the path to Truth, robbing us of the ability to make the best decisions in our lives."
Perhaps you could tell your paediatrician daughters exactly that about the stuff they're injecting into entirely helpless little children, Dennis. Vaccination is a cult and a psyop, Dennis, not a science. If you can't question it, it is BY DEFINITION not science. Present an argument against that point if you feel up to it.
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/10-reasons-i-will-never-get-another
Set them on the road to the Truth and maybe they will repent and become better paediatricians.
Motes and beams, Dennis, motes and beams.
What is your problem, Sheila?
No matter the subject you became apoplectic about vaccinations!
You get all nasty and insulting to me about my paediatric doctor daughters who you don't even know and haven't ever met. You have no idea on their thoughts on vaccinations. Implying they are bad pediatricians injecting stuff into entirely helpless little children.
I'd appreciate it if you lay off this! It's not a good look my dear. You are coming off as a bit of a nut case.
"Vaccination is a cult and a psyop not a science". OK write your paper, have it peer reviewed and published, and go collect your Nobel Prize.
Until then STFU.
Dennis, my dear, do provide some evidence of apoplexy. I merely responded to one of your endless, endless, endless, tedious responses to anyone who mentions religion. I haven't insulted your daughters, Dennis, I'm suggesting you help them to the truth, since you've just claimed it's so important to you. You insult people every time you're on here, Dennis, my dear. You keep mentioning that religious people are 'just a bit stupid'. How many times have you said that? Why are your insults OK, but everyone must tread on eggshells around you?
I don't think you should be telling people on a free space, where freedom of speech is a thing, to STFU, Dennis. I think maybe you should go and write your paper proving that there is no Creator and have it peer reviewed, then go and collect your Nobel Prize for Logic or whatever. Because at the moment, your logic is not quite there. But I'm not going to tell you to STFU, because you are free to write your endless, endless, endless, tedious ripostes to every mention of religion, and copy-paste the same stuff over and over and over and over again, as long as the owner of the blog is happy for you to do it. It's just that people do have every right to respond to your responses. See how it works, Dennis, my dear?
Interestingly, the first half of your diatribe is trying to suggest that maybe your daughters don't vaccinate children, but the end of your diatribe is suggesting there is no evidence that vaccines do any harm. Again, clarity is always helpful.
PS I also might mention that your 'no matter what the subject' is a bit out of place since we have had exactly two exchanges about vaccines and paediatricians. Both were occasioned by your tedious remarks about religion. Maybe you should think more about why, since literally everyone knows your views on religion because you repeat them ad nauseam to no possible effect whatsoever, you continue to wax 'apoplectic' about other people's personal beliefs with which you are bizarrely and unhealthily obsessed.
Don't you have something better to do my dear?
If posters want to endlessly and tediously post religion claims in this thread with no evidence, I have every right to respond to them until JHK bans me.
I don't mock people for being religious. I do however mock those for thinking their personal religion is exempt from mockery.
I merely point out the fallaciousness of their claims. If that offends anyone, that is their problem not mine. They are perfectly free to make their counterarguments. They never do, but resort to rubbishing your character
BTW, the burden of proof that there is a creator falls on those that claim there is one. It's nothing to do with logic my dear. It's a matter of epistemology; the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion. Something you don't have a clue about. Whether it's with respect to religion or vaccinations.
And by the way, besmirching my daughters, neither of whom you know, and dragging them through the mud suggesting they are guilty of malpractice, is very low class. As is implying that I know there is evidence that vaccines do no harm. I leave that question to educated doctors, not uneducated keyboard warriors like you.
I just love getting told I'm a liar by someone I never met.
You are not going to get away with that my dear.
“No amount of belief makes something true.” - James Randi
Read your latest post again! Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists? Or any evidence supporting your wild claim that vaccinating kids does more harm than good? Of course you don't. You don't have any, so you just resort to bashing me and my posts.
Oh dear, Dennis. You never can argue a point. And, because of that, you waste my time.
(1) 'Do you provide any evidence that a creator exists?'
Where did I say I was arguing for the existence of a creator? I don't argue about such things as I've said multiple times that intellectual argument on that topic is a waste of everyone's time. I merely said if YOU think you can resolve the issue in that way, then go ahead and do it (but I didn't, notably, tell you to STFU if you couldn't, because I am not like you). I was also pointing out the silliness of your demand that I should write a thesis, when the proof of vaccine damage already exists. Why re-invent the wheel? I also already directed you in a prevous post to the Substacks of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, which are essential to understanding the nefarious means by which the US Government has implemented its vaccination programme. Similar laws exist elsewhere.
(2) I did not say you do not have the right to bore everyone to tears with your obsession either. You clearly have that right, even though your tedious, repetitive copy-pasting does not appear to have the slightest effect on anyone's beliefs. Rather, no-one 'likes' those posts and no-one bothers arguing with them either. So, basically, you're talking to yourself, which you have the right to do, if you like wasting your time.
(3) I have not besmirched your daughters. I have asked you to point out to them, if they are not aware, that unvaccinated children do not suffer from the plethora of chronic conditions from which vaccinated children suffer (which makes a fortune for the medico-pharma cartel); nor do they tend to die of SIDS, which mostly happens shortly after vaccination. (Incidentally I consider it helpful to point this out generally as there may be someone on here who then goes off and does their own research, which may save a child from the Russian roulette of vaccination - why would that effort not be worthy?)
If your dauighters already know that, say, more children are harmed by MMR than by actual measles, then you just need to say that. If they don't know, then rather than 'besmirching' them, I am potentially providing a public service to their patients through their surely caring father who would not want them to find out another way, e.g. by a lawsuit from a patient's parents.
Your position seems to be:
I Dennis Merwood, may call people stupid and I may write tedious, repetitive posts regarding my personal obsession about other people's beliefs, but no-one may respond unless they wish to engage in a stupid to-and-fro that simply cannot be resolved by intellectual argument. If they point out anything else (e.g. that there is some irony in the fact that vaccination is a religion more than it is a science, given my MO), they will be told to STFU by a person who, with further irony, claims not to like any kind of reflections to be made on himself or the well known issues which everyone is aware of regarding the medico-pharma cartel.
Your daughters may be lovely human beings, Dennis, in which case, if they don't already know what I've told you, they should, logically, be grateful to be told. Doctors don't study vaccination at medical school, as I've already pointed out. They are just given a vaccination schedule and told to get on with it and not question it. Meanwhile, with every increase in the number of shots (currently around 80 in the US) chronic conditions like autism skyrocket.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dissolving-Illusions-Vaccines-Forgotten-Anniversary/dp/B0CZ61XLXH/ref=sr_1_1
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/B0D8K3X3RV/ref=sr_1_1
https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/sasha-latypova-its-literally-impossible
Finally, Dennis my dear, you ask if I don't have something better to do. Pots-kettles, Dennis. We may all, including you and I, spend our time doing as we wish.