I am enthusiastic about "drill baby drill." It's hard to imagine fuel cells becoming the thing any time soon. I recall Toyota saying in the mid 90's there would be a fuel cell RAV 4 in 2000. 25 years on they have a car finally but hydrogen is harder to find than a working Tesla charger in a Blue shithole. Also Trump's admonition that they're great but might explode. LOL!
I am enthusiastic about "drill baby drill." It's hard to imagine fuel cells becoming the thing any time soon. I recall Toyota saying in the mid 90's there would be a fuel cell RAV 4 in 2000. 25 years on they have a car finally but hydrogen is harder to find than a working Tesla charger in a Blue shithole. Also Trump's admonition that they're great but might explode. LOL!
John, I am a Toyota fan and I talked to my salesman about progress on the hydrogen car. Not much, and aside from a few zealots, not much interest. IMHO, plug in hybrids is where things are going to go. Biased, because I own a RAV4 Prime and spend an average of $20 per month on gas and about $30 on electricity to run it. The biggest problem is in availability.
Yes, why not have a nuclear engine in every car? With a special code to turn it into a bomb. The code is only given to consumers of high moral quality.
I am a Toyota fan as well. There is a fuel cell/hybrid now that looks a lot like an Avalon/Lexus 350. 30 years ago the fuel cells were going to use a thing called a reformer IIRC to allow gasoline, ethanol, etc. to be the fuel which would go through this reformer membrane and separate the electrons etc. The failure to go ahead was because this membrane could not be made reliable enough for long enough to be practical. The on vehicle storage issue with hydrogen was solved a while back but the other issues like generation, distribution and safety remain as hydrogen seems to be the only workable fuel. If those membranes worked and current fuels could be used instead of hydrogen I am pretty sure the fuel cell vehicles would be a big thing today.
Kinder Morgan sets up landfills to capture the methane and bottle it on site. I've seen landfills where they flare off the gas like in the Permian. There is so much natgas in the Permian they do not have enough pipeline capacity to send it all, hence it is flared. Diamondback is partnering with Verde Gas to make high grade gasoline from this excess natgas. Some are using it to generate electricity and converting from diesel engine powered sites to electric motor power. Still others are attempting to attract these electricity hog AI and data centers to site near the fields for the cheap electricity they can generate with the gas they had been flaring
Why, thanks again, John S., my local landfill/recycling center saves $10,000 per month on its power bill that way; they stuck a pipe in the bottom of the old landfill and run it to a generator shack. The owner, 4th generation, showed me when he was walking the yard.
I was on a back road in Midlands, TX; from where I was sitting, I counted 31 flareoff stacks. Each one was millions of pilot lights' worth of gas, all of it just going to waste. We really could be doing all of this so differently.
Diesel electric, todays standard for railroad, proves it.
My dad was a coal tender on the old trains, and yet there is still a place for them too, such as in Nepal and the Himalayas. The one-size-fits-all model of the Greens and the corporates is a bloody crime against nature.
Funny how almost no one is aware trains are electric and the huge diesel engines are the generators.
If anyone is interested in seeing the most amazing recycling/power generating operation I have seen, it is the Olmstead County operation in Rochester, Minnesota. They burn garbage at over 2,000 degrees and generate electricity and provide steam heat to a lot of government buildings. They extended the life of their landfill by 125 years which is significant in that area because it is mostly solid rock a short distance down which is unsuitable for a landfill. Unlike most places they can't just put them anywhere. If anyone is going to the Mayo Clinic and looking for something interesting to do while there, this is worth seeing.
Up and back to Vegas for $50, the first 50 miles is electric. It is wonderful not to have to charge up on trips.
I drive on the electric plug-in for about two months on about a quarter tank of gas, then run the gas out to freshen the tank. That fill-up is usually 30-40 dollars.
Oh yeah, A/C is expensive, we pay on a budget leveling plan at $246 per month. It would be about $400/month in summer without the balancing.
A natural autoclave, ha, that is about right. Summers, you get things done in early morning or at night. Playing golf in January makes up for it thoтАЩ.
The electric vehicle industry shut down fuel cell research. I saw many operative fuel cells at a conference I attended in 2001. Then, they all disappeared.
As JHK said long ago, trying to control hydrogen in a relatively dumb car public is a big problem. Boy, you think Pintos blew up when hit from behind? Imagine the Hindenburg every time an accident happens, or the reaction around a leaky тАЬpumpтАЭ when the local idiot lights up a cigar.
As Toyota, Tesla etc., move towards solid state batteries, the bad parts of Lithium should decline. You are right though, Lithium is bad news as long as they do not know what makes it ignite and control that environment. Plus, BRICS+ controls the market.
All generators that make our power, regardless the fuel, are hydrogen cooled. If hydrogen was as big a problem as yall say, you would read about it, daily. And they would figure out a way to blame climate change and Donald trump. The biggest danger from hydrogen is its inherent danger in mixing with air. The perfect combination and you barely need a spark. But otherwise, itтАЩs relatively safe. Btw, because of its density is why we use it to cool generators. ItтАЩs more efficient that the generatorтАЩs rotor spin in a gas much lighter than air, or anything else.
Schrauth is so right on about fuel cells, and they aren't limited to hydrogen. I just wanted to thank him for banging on about them as a wonderful alternative.
I am enthusiastic about "drill baby drill." It's hard to imagine fuel cells becoming the thing any time soon. I recall Toyota saying in the mid 90's there would be a fuel cell RAV 4 in 2000. 25 years on they have a car finally but hydrogen is harder to find than a working Tesla charger in a Blue shithole. Also Trump's admonition that they're great but might explode. LOL!
John, I am a Toyota fan and I talked to my salesman about progress on the hydrogen car. Not much, and aside from a few zealots, not much interest. IMHO, plug in hybrids is where things are going to go. Biased, because I own a RAV4 Prime and spend an average of $20 per month on gas and about $30 on electricity to run it. The biggest problem is in availability.
Actually we will be fueling our cars with water one day. Hydrogen derived from water. No reason it wonтАЩt be accomplished.
100% recycling cycle with hydrogen.
Heavy water!
Yes, why not have a nuclear engine in every car? With a special code to turn it into a bomb. The code is only given to consumers of high moral quality.
I am a Toyota fan as well. There is a fuel cell/hybrid now that looks a lot like an Avalon/Lexus 350. 30 years ago the fuel cells were going to use a thing called a reformer IIRC to allow gasoline, ethanol, etc. to be the fuel which would go through this reformer membrane and separate the electrons etc. The failure to go ahead was because this membrane could not be made reliable enough for long enough to be practical. The on vehicle storage issue with hydrogen was solved a while back but the other issues like generation, distribution and safety remain as hydrogen seems to be the only workable fuel. If those membranes worked and current fuels could be used instead of hydrogen I am pretty sure the fuel cell vehicles would be a big thing today.
What about methane? It's used in fuel cells too, isn't it?
Then we could blow up the undersea clathrates and the tundra, lol
or invest in garbage dumps and manure piles /s
Kinder Morgan sets up landfills to capture the methane and bottle it on site. I've seen landfills where they flare off the gas like in the Permian. There is so much natgas in the Permian they do not have enough pipeline capacity to send it all, hence it is flared. Diamondback is partnering with Verde Gas to make high grade gasoline from this excess natgas. Some are using it to generate electricity and converting from diesel engine powered sites to electric motor power. Still others are attempting to attract these electricity hog AI and data centers to site near the fields for the cheap electricity they can generate with the gas they had been flaring
Why, thanks again, John S., my local landfill/recycling center saves $10,000 per month on its power bill that way; they stuck a pipe in the bottom of the old landfill and run it to a generator shack. The owner, 4th generation, showed me when he was walking the yard.
I was on a back road in Midlands, TX; from where I was sitting, I counted 31 flareoff stacks. Each one was millions of pilot lights' worth of gas, all of it just going to waste. We really could be doing all of this so differently.
Diesel electric, todays standard for railroad, proves it.
My dad was a coal tender on the old trains, and yet there is still a place for them too, such as in Nepal and the Himalayas. The one-size-fits-all model of the Greens and the corporates is a bloody crime against nature.
Funny how almost no one is aware trains are electric and the huge diesel engines are the generators.
If anyone is interested in seeing the most amazing recycling/power generating operation I have seen, it is the Olmstead County operation in Rochester, Minnesota. They burn garbage at over 2,000 degrees and generate electricity and provide steam heat to a lot of government buildings. They extended the life of their landfill by 125 years which is significant in that area because it is mostly solid rock a short distance down which is unsuitable for a landfill. Unlike most places they can't just put them anywhere. If anyone is going to the Mayo Clinic and looking for something interesting to do while there, this is worth seeing.
I drive about 13000 miles a year.
Why?
Errands in wide open Phoenix and an occasional trip to Cali or Las Vegas.
for $20/30?!!
Phoenix traffic is bad enough, but there's the proof in the pudding right there.
Uhh...what about A/C? You live in a natural autoclave.
Up and back to Vegas for $50, the first 50 miles is electric. It is wonderful not to have to charge up on trips.
I drive on the electric plug-in for about two months on about a quarter tank of gas, then run the gas out to freshen the tank. That fill-up is usually 30-40 dollars.
Oh yeah, A/C is expensive, we pay on a budget leveling plan at $246 per month. It would be about $400/month in summer without the balancing.
A natural autoclave, ha, that is about right. Summers, you get things done in early morning or at night. Playing golf in January makes up for it thoтАЩ.
Thanks, I meant a/c in the car, but you've got a hybrid! No plugging in! Obvious why they got rid of hybrids, because the sadists hate us.
Yes,the number of miles the battery can drive the car drops, about 10% with A/C on. It is an electric plug-in in hybrid. Best of all worlds.
The electric vehicle industry shut down fuel cell research. I saw many operative fuel cells at a conference I attended in 2001. Then, they all disappeared.
As JHK said long ago, trying to control hydrogen in a relatively dumb car public is a big problem. Boy, you think Pintos blew up when hit from behind? Imagine the Hindenburg every time an accident happens, or the reaction around a leaky тАЬpumpтАЭ when the local idiot lights up a cigar.
Gas isn't flammable, right?
Sure it is, but not near as volatile as hydrogen, plus the small size of the hydrogen molecule makes leaks more of a problem.
Fumes
There are multiple ways to store it safely.
Yeah, until the first one blows sky high.
A BMW electric car burned my neighbors house to the ground.
As Toyota, Tesla etc., move towards solid state batteries, the bad parts of Lithium should decline. You are right though, Lithium is bad news as long as they do not know what makes it ignite and control that environment. Plus, BRICS+ controls the market.
The desire to move from Point A to Point B has consequences.
Always.
MurphyтАЩs law prevails evermore and someone will find a way to blow one up.
Or some terrorist?
Would a hydrogen electrical plant, for example, require any less security than a nuclear plant?
All generators that make our power, regardless the fuel, are hydrogen cooled. If hydrogen was as big a problem as yall say, you would read about it, daily. And they would figure out a way to blame climate change and Donald trump. The biggest danger from hydrogen is its inherent danger in mixing with air. The perfect combination and you barely need a spark. But otherwise, itтАЩs relatively safe. Btw, because of its density is why we use it to cool generators. ItтАЩs more efficient that the generatorтАЩs rotor spin in a gas much lighter than air, or anything else.
Excellent comment, hats off
Schrauth is so right on about fuel cells, and they aren't limited to hydrogen. I just wanted to thank him for banging on about them as a wonderful alternative.