8 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Some constitutional law experts doubt that the preemptive pardon has legal effect. It has to be tested in a court of law. That means the DoJ has to prosecute them, then the defendants’ lawyers will file a motion to dismiss based upon the preemptive pardon, then . . . The judge has to rule on the motion. It may go up to the Supreme Court.

Expand full comment

Where SCOTUS , like in 2020 says “no standing, can’t hear it”?? Fuck THAT shit.

Expand full comment

With chief justice Roberts and that female fake conservative that Trump installed at the end of his term probably voting with the 3 female leftists.

Expand full comment

Fake?

She is still better than the piece of shit WEIRDO Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her weird pedo fetish beliefs.

Small improvements make huge differences.

Expand full comment

Well, Ben, with the Court supposedly composed of 6 conservatives, it seems like many decisions have wound of 5-4, with Roberts and Barrett voting with the libs. To take one example, they voted that Texas must take down the barbed wire barrier it was constructing on the border. Famed attorney Robert Barnes has shown that Barrett repeatedly voted with the libs, except on abortion.

Expand full comment

Time will tell but I say again better than what she replaced.

Expand full comment

Ben, the conservatives expected a locked in conservative court and are definitely disappointed. SCOTUS determines the Constitutionality of Laws and lower court decisions. It is not purely Dem. vs. GOP, but loose vs. Strict interpretation of the Constitution. It is becoming , however, Deep State vs. Trump group as they decide the power level of the federal government over the States and ultimately, us. Roberts is a RINO, and that hurts as the Chief Justice wields power over the court.

Expand full comment

Roberts is indeed awful it was his vote that gave us the travesty of Obama care that has slowly destroyed everyone's health care to service people who don't, can't or won't pay their own way through life.

Expand full comment