196 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
JohnAZ's avatar

Trump’s victory is step one.

Fox looked at who still voted more for Kamala than Trump.

Folks making over $100000

College educated

Non-religious

Kinda sums it up, the elite lost. Joe Average is giving the USA another chance.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

The commies voted for Kamala. And when I say commies, that group is made up of people who mostly don't know they are (the professional class). They like the term "socialism" but don't really understand what that is. Believe me, I work with them in the corporatesphere. The reason they got defeated is because they don't do any homework and their beliefs are, as James says, built on fantasy, not reality. And that facade comes down quick when faced with how the world actually works.

I prefer James' term "Woke Jacobins" but they are also cultural Marxists and commies. James Lindsay covers all of this - the where, when, why and how - in his awesome publications.

But they lost. The American people aren't commie-friendly - even if the commies tried to sneak in their agenda under the guise of "equity and inclusion."

Thank God we are smarter than that!

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

Since when did communists believe in wall Street?

In fact, they loathe it, but both parties here are pretty much fascists, aka public private mafia.

Communism it is not.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

I've studied communism/communists all my life and I'm 70 y,o. It was the oligarchs/Wall St. who brought in communism. They don't want it for themselves but they want it for the rest of us - they get to enjoy wealth but we don't. If you learn anything about communist Russia, you will learn it was basically run by a very small amount of very wealthy men who never shared that wealth with anyone else. You may want to read this book, by an author who studied this entire topic with extreme thoroughness:

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists

https://www.amazon.com/Wall-Street-Bolshevik-Revolution-Capitalists/dp/190557035X/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&sr=1-4

Here is just one question for you, it comes from a review of that book:

"Why did the 1917 American Red Cross Mission to Russia include more financiers than medical doctors? Rather than caring for the victims of war and revolution, its members seemed more intent on negotiating contracts with the Kerensky government and, subsequently, the Bolshevik regime."

Expand full comment
Mr. No's avatar

Yeah. When I was studying Russian in college during the mid-60's, I came across the word "dacha" meaning country estate and was stunned by the idea of country estates behind the Iron Curtain.

Fast forward 30 years. The Iron Curtain had fallen, the Evil Empire dissipated, and all was sweetness and light for a while. I happened to be working at a major university and came to know the professor in charge of the study abroad program that sent exchange students to Eastern Europe. The subjects of their theses and dissertations were astonishing. Business management in Ukraine! Technological innovation in Russia! Similar topics Czechoslovakia. That's when I realized the infrastructure for all this had to have been laid long, long ago. There were books on the subject but they were poorly publicized and few people were aware of them, much less read them.

Today it's all out in the open thanks to an alternative media - no longer alternative - which has become a battering ram for truth.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

I was in Soviet Union in 1977; was there a month and had to stay in hospital to have my appendix removed. I was able to talk to many Russians so I gathered lots of info about USSR. Here in America we can trace roots of Communism back to the Marxists who were kicked out of Germany and other European countries back in mid-1800s right after Karl Marx wrote Communist Manifesto. Abraham Lincoln let in these Marxists and used them to get re-elected.

Expand full comment
Mr. No's avatar

Interesting!

Expand full comment
Patrick D. Grengs II's avatar

Yes -- I agree. In Communism, there is no Private Property. However, there is still a lot of Property. Who will "manage" all of this Property? The Party Leadership, of course. And so you get a Totalitarian - Administrative - Class. During Covid, many of these folks referred to themselves as "Experts."

Expand full comment
Honeybee's avatar

Absolutely correct. The NWO aka Mr. Global is their latest reiteration. Burns my ass that the U.S. military is used as their juggernaut to strip countries of their natural assets.

Expand full comment
A.M.'s avatar

Chilling, isn't it. Fascinating book I read about Armand Hammer by Jay Epstein illustrates your last point.

Expand full comment
kam's avatar

"isms" of every kind are just tools, a mirage while they bleed you dry.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Their Final Order will have elements of both Capitalism and Communism. Guess which will rule? The Few. For the rest? "You will own nothing and you will be happy.

The remedy is more Capitalism, right? No. That is the cause. The remedy always was Fascism or National Socialism. Keep the Capitalists in line, and running scared. Make them serve the nation for the good of all. Not persecution and confiscation or nationalization - except in extreme cases. Don't want to drive them away a la Atlas Shrugged. In his bluff way, Pinochet expressed the Truth: Of course you treat people who can make and do things very well.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Not true. The commies just take over the institutions. They have done that quite well: See Marxist indoctrination in the universities, and DEI/ESG in the corporations.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

But yet, universities and corporations rely on milking the government.

What is it called when the private industries and the government walk hand in hand?

Fascism.

Expand full comment
SusanMc's avatar

Public Private Partnerships

Sounds benign

It isn’t

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

I don't agree, communism takes over the means of production. I would suggest reading/watching some of James Lindsay's work on the topic. Newdiscourses.com.

Expand full comment
Rob (c137)'s avatar

So communism means they run the military industrial complex? 😂

Last I checked in history, when it comes to universities in the USSR , people were able to get practically free education because educated workers benefit the state.

Here in Amerika, education is the most expensive and only benefits the wealthy who can buy their way in. What is the definition of a nation that is run by the wealthy?

OLIGARCHY.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Just because it doesn't fit exactly with Russian communism doesn't mean it isn't communism - which can take a number of different forms with different names, i.e., communism, socialism, fascism.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Whatever you want to name it is fine - and why you're so invested, who knows. But what Democrats have been trying to instill is communism. It is textbook.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Yes, as Marx said, capital centralizes. Capitalism unchecked leads to Plutocratic Oligarchy. You people won. Careful of what you dream about, you might get it. Happy? You didn't understand the consequences, even though unintended perhaps.

Expand full comment
kam's avatar

Free Market Capitalism, free of Monopolies, free of Government favoritism, has yet to arrive on the shores of America.

Once a Private Central Bank controls Money and Credit, only the favored few will prosper beyond their wildest dreams.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Such a thing can't exist since it is opposed to human society. If order isn't kept, if they are allowed to run roughshod over everyone, then the people will take matters into their own hands. Ditto pure Communism.

Expand full comment
GenEarly's avatar

and "What" do the Universities teach??? Demoncrazy ProgreSSive Communism

Tyranny is Tyranny, the "Isms" just are for debating facades.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

It's Fascism when Government leads the dance. What we have is the opposite with the private sphere leading (at the highest level) - Plutocracy in other words.

You want to separate the two spheres, right? Can't be done in the modern industrial state. Actually, it was never really done since human life is an organic whole. In any case, one will lead. But which? You want the one that is faceless, devoted to profit alone, and beholden only to owners and shareholders to lead, right? Not the one voted in and that take an oath to serve.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Here is a book you might be interested in reading, it confirms your statement about "the professional class" and communism:

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: The Remarkable True Story of the American Capitalists Who Financed the Russian Communists

https://www.amazon.com/Wall-Street-Bolshevik-Revolution-Capitalists/dp/190557035X/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&sr=1-4

IMO this is an excellent book. See my other comment reply to Rob for more info.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Thank you. And this probably would pair nicely with what James Lindsay's work on cultural Marxism and the way the Democrats and the left have used that to try to create a new USSR out of the US.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Good, Grogan. Capitalism/Communism is one system, heads and tails. Communism is the fighting arm of Capitalism that breaks systems and nations not tied into the Capitalist global order. Of course things can and do go wrong. After a long travail, Russia has thrown this crap off and become Fascist. China, National Socialist, proud against to be the Han, the Sons of Heaven.

Expand full comment
A.M.'s avatar

I respectfully submit that fascism/communism is a false split. They are the same thing in essence. It bears out historically. They are both statist, exclusionary power grabs. They share much more than they differ. We're arguing about the distinctions between two pieces of silverware. It doesn't matter. What matters is that they are both essentially anti people.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

I think the only difference is that fascism tends to be extreme rightwing, and communism extreme leftwing. And culturally, they are different.

Expand full comment
A.M.'s avatar

That's the classic take, but doesn't that make it a full circle? I don't see the cultural difference either. People are killed, that's pretty much the same. Each decides their enemy, kills them and takes over. Rinse and repeat.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

The cultural part of Marxism is the most fascinating. This has been planned since at least the 1940s. The people who warned of creeping communism were correct. They saw the signs beginning with the depravity of the postmodernist movement, etc. This has all been a road towards the utter breakdown of western mores and culture. They aim to tear down normalcy, religion, community, and introduce indoctrination, especially of children. Notice how the Democrats fight to keep absolute filth on the shelves in schools so that young kids of 6 can access it? They are fine with Drag Queens in woman-face parading around and flashing themselves at toddlers? Utter depravity - straight out of postmodernism. Those people (Foucault, etc) were all into pedophilia too.

Expand full comment
kam's avatar

Money and the government granted monopoly of the Federal Reserve (Note) co-opts the wannabee Academic Marxists. They both use each other to the detriment of everyone else.

Expand full comment
Storie Mooser's avatar

Thanks Mary Rose, for encapsulating the issue as one of "postmodernism", essentially aimed at eradicating the Enlightenment.

Expand full comment
A.M.'s avatar

Many would argue that the Enlightenment was the beginning of the problem. Intriguing notion, I think. It rather depends on where one stands on the French Revolution and whether or not one is Christian.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

In other words, they're totally different. But yes they both use guns, war just being the extension of politics by other means.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Yes, that is a big difference.

Expand full comment
Nova's avatar

Fascism is completely different than communism. Fascism is nationalism while communism is globalism.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Yeah, that's why they fought so viciously, right? Capitalism/Communism, being globalist, united against nationalism, be it Fascism or National Socialism - or the earlier form, Monarchism as per Czarist Russia.

I've just given you the master key to understand all things.

Expand full comment
Helen Loughrey's avatar

Omg We are surely doomed when so many conflate liberalism with communism. Communists hate liberals for your information. Communism is internationalist (ie workers reject nationalism as a capitalist ploy to send them to wars). Liberalism is globalist ( ie a cabal of billionaires plotting to own everything) . There is a difference: in one, the little guy gets a roof and 3 squares and lives a long happy life in community. In the other, he’s deep in debt, cut off from family due to job changes, and worried he still might end up sleeping in the gutter or bleeding out on some foreign battlefield.

Expand full comment
Don Reed's avatar

11/11/24: It's Communism (Stalin's) with a Capitalist tip jar.

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

would you call castro a capitalist? He died with a net worth of at least 400 million USD. All of the communist dictators are wealthy or die wealthy. The oligarchs in the US absolutely are communists. But not for themselves of course. They want to impose communism on the peasants. The worse part is millions of those very same peasants believe in communism. They believe in something that is contrary to human nature and can never work. No matter how many enemies of the people you have to murder to bring in the communist utopia.

Expand full comment
Breck's avatar

I prefer Marxists to communists. It has better punch and is a bit more accurate.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto.

Expand full comment
Breck's avatar

And you are writing this...why? As some aid for those that don't know that? or ??

Expand full comment
Paul's avatar

There's absolutely nothing communist about any of this. Just because communism had some features, such as totalitarianism, it doesn't make every other -ism that might share some of these traits communism too.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Also: Spot the lefty! Lefties love to defend communism. Esp. China and Stalin. I asked one lefty why she thought the oppressive Chinese regime was a good thing and why she fought for it to come here - even though she thinks Chinese are oppressed (more cognitive dissonance to begin with). She said, "Oh I guess it works well for THEM."

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

That was actually kind of brilliant, asking that question of a college commie.

What a splendid showcasing of their religious thought. Kudos!

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

A self-described communist I met had a younger brother whose middle name was, "Countway, as in Countway Library at Harvard Medical School", he smugly said.

At that moment, I realized why so many well-fed Americans who never worked in Romanian salt mines as children self-describe as "communist", or "socialist".

It helps them to feel edgy, exotic, creative, intelligent, brilliant, fascinating, special -- everything they are not.

Edit: Being *both* a communist *and* a member of the Countway family "distinguished" the above undergrad from his peers and satisfied his conversational goals, which explains why he failed to notice his hypocrisy.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

You might enjoy this. Lindsay's Woke for Dummies. He breaks it all down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MSCMR1sFbo&ab_channel=NewDiscourses

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Remember on the old site, one poster said, Everyone should be able to go anywhere and do anything?

No borders. Extreme Individualism which is Capitalism which is Globalism which is Communism for the many.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Do you have an issue with people traveling or something? Please clarify.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

They said, go anywhere and do anything once they got there. That's not just "traveling". It's just a fancy way of saying open borders. Milton Friedman said the same thing in a similar way.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Sounds like you're making that up.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

You're lying.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

I once read about a journalist who seemed to believe he was entitled to, "go anywhere and do anything".

Some communities make it clear ahead of time that they don't like YT getting in their face, but YT be entitled and do it anyway.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Except for the color revolution, the infiltration of DEI and ESG (textbook communism), the indoctrination by our educational institutions, the struggle sessions, the breaking up of the family unit, the attempt by the state to take our children through the trans craze among other things. Sure, Jan.

Expand full comment
Sunny's avatar

I wrote a piece on why Kamala lost.

I hope you enjoy. If so please forward to your friends and readers.

Sunny

https://substack.com/@rob13/note/c-76195536

Expand full comment
kam's avatar

Obama lost. Biden and Kamala were just useful tools.

Expand full comment
David Poe's avatar

The intellectuals at a university seem to think that they are immune to propaganda since they are the smartest people in the world.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

As it turns out, they are more susceptible than just about anyone else.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

James put it perfectly: because they believe the credentialed other "experts".

T'is the credentialing that's the problem. If confers a counterfeit stamp of legitimacy, and thus, status: You're in, or you're out.

Status, not expertise, is the goal. Patronage is the reward of loyalists.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

It is pretty brilliant that they figured out that to get the "intellectual" professional class on board, all they had to do was make sure whoever spouted the lies sounded like a professor or touted impressive credentials.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

"He sounds like us. He speaks our language and wears our colors."

I call 'speaking Uni' a dialect. Talking to them outside of that dialect is like speaking French to a dog.

(I don't speak Uni, myself. Never learned the language. Thus, I have no authority, only the opinions of the uneducated, the grunting of hogs.)

Expand full comment
Dorthe's avatar

Exactly. In an interview with Hede Massing - a communist recruiter in the USA - she

declares how almost impossible it was to get working class people into/working for the party but the more easy to get 'the intellectuals and the middle class' because of lofty ideas.

See 46-48 minute: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZuHcPnni14&ab_channel=20thCenturyTimeMachine

Expand full comment
Ward Dorrity's avatar

So "smart," they're stupid. They've educated themselves into a sneering idiocy.

Expand full comment
Bruno's avatar

Disproportionate self importance is part of the problem

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

It's not a matter of IQ (capacity), to say it's of ego (status) is closer to the mark.

Do they recognize or respect my status markers, or not? For instance, I wouldn't know whether a NASCAR mechanic is talking out his ass, so I don't know where he ranks on his tribe's totem pole. "Don't you know who I am?", they demand.

It's the sounds they make. Our hoots and calls determine if we're from the right tree.

Am I surrounded by friendly monkeys, or stranger monkeys? Because everybody knows those monkeys from that tree over there are crazy, stupid, and dangerous.

(The problem is, those monkeys believe the same thing about me. I don't make the right sounds.)

Expand full comment
2001_Odd's avatar

Lie to a liar, steal from a thief, dupe a self-proclaimed "smart" person. . .

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

"An excellent plumber is infinitely more admirable than an incompetent philosopher.

The society which scorns excellence in plumbing because plumbing is a humble activity and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because it is an exalted activity will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy.

Neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water."

~ John Gardner

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

"An excellent plumber is infinitely more admirable than an incompetent philosopher."

Sedgewick,

Incompetent Philosopher? How could you tell?

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Exactly. The world divides here. Some of us can see which ideas hold water and some of us can't.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

"Incompetent Philosopher? How could you tell?"

Good question. Might "incompetent philosopher" be redundant?

Dr. Thomas Sowell addressed this best when he said:

"It is so easy to be wrong-and to persist in being wrong-when the costs of being wrong are paid by others."

That’s a really good question. I think your question concerns LATENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY, and, ultimately, self-honesty, and the desire for contentment.

When a diesel truck mechanic fails to do a competent job, he (REAL diesel truck mechanics are ALL men) risks 80,000 pounds of fully-loaded tractor-trailer rig going 55 mph running out of control on a heavily-trafficked interstate. Should something go wrong, there are records of who last worked on the truck and who signed-off on their work. In other words, LOW LATENCY and HIGH ACCOUNTABILITY.

When concert pianists, diesel truck mechanics, jet fighter pilots, etc., make a mistake, feedback has low latency and high accountability. Either they improve quickly or they are forced to do something else, or they die, possibly taking others with them.

With philosophers, it takes years, decades, even generations for people to find flaws in their thinking.

--> Because of this, I suspect that "the life of the mind" might attract those who fear accountability, who actively yet subconsciously desire to rush past Truth with averted eyes straight to the wine and cheese, avoiding self-honesty and depriving themselves of the opportunity to achieve contentment.

Which might explain why many ancient philosophers (whose ideas have been VERIFIED by subsequent generations) tend to emphasize action.

Thanks for your question. It made me get off my ass, if only briefly.

Expand full comment
kam's avatar

Removing Tenure would reduce Idiocy.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

Removing academia would do even more. Loving those "higher" ed. "vaccine" mandates :9

Expand full comment
IAN2364's avatar

And when you question their claim, they substantiate it with an opinion, and if they need to buttress that claim, they merely add additional opinions to their circular irrefutable equation.

At some point in their life, did they fall off the bus?

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

I know this from experience within my own family. They believe their opinions are facts! They honestly do.

Expand full comment
Miss Rodeo's avatar

Why would anyone send their kids to college now? We sent one to little-old Texas Tech and he came home a raving lunatic. Even west Texas is no haven of common sense.

Expand full comment
Tom from WNY's avatar

The Progressive Elites who believed it was their Divine Right to rule us lesser humans. We finally realized, as Glenn Beck said; "We surround them."

Expand full comment
Patrick D. Grengs II's avatar

It's becoming more common to refer to them as the Progressive Parasites.

After surrounding them, it will be important to starve them out -- that is to say, to remove their status. Mass firings from government bureaucracies is one positive step down that road.

Expand full comment
Sunny's avatar

I wrote a piece on why Kamala lost.

I hope you enjoy. If so please forward to your friends and readers.

Sunny

https://substack.com/@rob13/note/c-76195536

Expand full comment
Bob Fitz's avatar

Ever notice jobs that serve The Program pay pretty good? The people at the top install an affluent under class to take orders and run the program on the Little People. Folks who benefit most from playing the game never vote to have the board flipped over and the pieces reset.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

I think that DEI money train is about to end. I am already hearing rumblings at my company (Thank God!) and the progressive idiot I work alongside is having meltdowns. I absolutely relish it.

Expand full comment
Yirgach's avatar

My wife's company has a contract with one of the Gates companies.

I could hear the heads exploding during one of her conference calls.

Hahaha!

Expand full comment
Cheryl's avatar

Delicious!

Expand full comment
Sunny's avatar

I wrote a piece on why Kamala lost.

I hope you enjoy. If so please forward to your friends and readers.

Sunny

https://substack.com/@rob13/note/c-76195536

Expand full comment
Ripple's avatar

Enough pimping of your Substack, "Sunny".

Expand full comment
Sunny's avatar

thank you for sharing! Have a nice day>

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Knock it off, Sonny.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

No. Thank YOU for sharing!

Have a nice day!

Hope that helps!

Stay safe!

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

REACHING OUT, Sunny, to PROACTIVELY remind you to get your bird flu, monkeypox, and shingles vaccines, as well as your kp.2 and kp.3 variant jabs and boosters!

Hope that helps!

Stay safe!

Be well!

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

How can any sane person believe that Joe Biden got ten million more votes in 2020 than Trump did this week? They should form a club including those who believe Epstein killed himself and that it is best that boys have their penises chopped off without notifying their parents. Regardless of their beliefs, Liz Cheney and her dad should be made co-chairs of this group of morons.

Expand full comment
Beth Nicolaides's avatar

Just saw a chart of bellwether counties that stretched back to 1984, each, almost without exception, having correctly picked the winner.

Except for the year 2020, in which only two of the counties (one of them in Delaware) went for Biden.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

Of course, the 2020 presidential election was a fraud and a fake worthy of Venezuela.

Expand full comment
Beth Nicolaides's avatar

I saw the fraudulent in real time, watching Wiscondin returns, which never stretched beyond 9 p.m. To this day I can feel the blood pressure rise when I think of the gaslighting and censorship that tried to silence those who saw. And when I think of the Bidens, acting as if they had won something.

Jill Biden even commissioned the composing of a "Fanfare for the First Lady." Hrrrrrrrr!

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

I was in NYC, listening to the AM radio from as far away as WLS in Chicago.

I heard the shutdown and the Steal in real time, as I listened to different stations all night long.

Funny thing, I was broke down in the mountains of Arizona at another time, so I sat and listened to the Steal from Kari Lake there, too. Couldn't run the motor or heater, so it was getting a bit chilly; still, when I heard what was happening, that cab heated up considerably.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Jill wore a stunning, sleeveless, red pants suit when she went to vote. Nobody fucks with the Bidens.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

Purple was oddly out of fashion.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

DOCTOR Jill already has a song about her.

YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=250MMq0fTrU

Minnie The Moocher (feat. The Blues Brothers) - YouTube

Expand full comment
A Landmesser's avatar

I say bs to that. Kamala won the inner cities. Not exactly the habitat of those earning an average of over 100,000. More like welfare parasites. Chicago, Flint, St Louis, DC, New Orleans, Shreveport, NYC, Memphis, New Orleans. Sure academia and Wall Street voted for the politburo's candidate but the average union guy didn't. In fact that Harvard gender studies grad, the one with the tats and earing in his nose did vote for the Knee pad Queen. Hard working minorities who want the American dream have no use for government health care or freebies. The parasite class and their mutant permanent slave class clamoring for monies for hardships they never suffered. Its a party of men dressing as women; people so untalented that they demand employment based on characteristics irrelevant to any sane person. Who employs an firemen based on gender or religion? The Democrat Party is the Jacobin Party.

Expand full comment
J Boss's avatar

My anecdotal experience disagrees with that general conclusion. Just about every technical professional I know and work with meets that criteria and still voted for Trump.

I think it was an indepence and freedom and economic divide, perhaps religion too.

Not everyone that went to college ended up DEI brainwashed. A lot of us older folks learned how to think critically, so much so that we despise the old Republican party and RINOs nearly as much as the radical left.

Expand full comment
SusanMc's avatar

The people with Common Sense who love this land & our God.

Another words grounded.

Expand full comment
Maria Goldstein's avatar

Interestingly, Trump's total vote hardly shifted since 2020, at 74-75 million. The Democrat vote collapsed - from 81 million to 67 million. That's 14 million who just didn't show up. I have to say, Trump looked as surprised last Tuesday night as he did in 2016. "Lucky Loser".

Expand full comment
Miss Rodeo's avatar

And a BIG middle finger.

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

John,

Well, I voted for Trump. College educated? Yes. Non-religious? Absolutely.

...Uhh, what was the other one?

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

Income > $100000

Expand full comment
Patrick D. Grengs II's avatar

I check all the boxes (make over $100k, College, non-religious) ... however, I have worked for 30+ years as an engineer in entrepreneurial enterprises where initiative, accountability, and a solid grounding in reality are absolutely necessary. It was pure theater to prop Kamala up as the candidate -- theater + hubris + "we can repeat what we did in 2020." Now we are in a bit of Wait And See -- let's see what Trump and his cabinet actually do over their first six months, in particular, after Trump has learned so much over the past eight years.

Expand full comment
Sunny's avatar

I wrote a piece on why Kamala lost.

I hope you enjoy. If so please forward to your friends and readers.

Sunny

https://substack.com/@rob13/note/c-76195536

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

Why Kamala lost? Just study the below list of her attributes and accomplishments;

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Thank you.

Expand full comment
JohnAZ's avatar

I keep hearing how wonderful the economy is today from the media. Then I look around and see that inflation is still galloping away, the job market has been a lie for 12 months, to the tune of <900000 jobs>, the unemployment rate is a lie , to the tune of not including 9 million non-employed young males. The entire Leftist claims to a good economy is a fabrication.

I wonder what the economy would look like without Elon Musk right now.

Is there anyone out there that would agree that the inflation rate is 2.4%?

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Shut up.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

+1 I admire your restraint.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 8
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Raven's avatar

It’s the TV news bunch that watches 24/7 that still thinks the news is Walter Cronkite. The rest of us have a smart phone can use a computer and realize the TV is no more than a movie screen for made up stories that woke up. From what I understand The Amish were pivotal. Want to save the world, turn off your TV!!!

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Yes, Amish were pivotal! In Lancaster County PA alone, something like 180,000 voted for Trump and they historically don't vote. That was enough to put Trump over the top. There's a really good video on You Tube by Nick Johnson channel on the Amish voting in PA. Nick went there and interviewed the Amish and did a great job. Husband grew up in the county Nick went to, lots of Amish there and he says they NEVER voted - until now.

Expand full comment
Abbybwood's avatar

The Democrats fucked with their farms and found out.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

The Russians made them sell raw milk and use non-GMO seeds!

Expand full comment
carily myers's avatar

Scott Presler registered them, hired vans ( out of his own $) to take them into "town" to vote.

He was the only person who thought about the .gov over-reach that was hurting them.

We owe Scott alot. He brought it.

Expand full comment
messianicdruid's avatar

The last intact Israelite [ ishi - reign - eloi ] Tribe.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

I agree, although I interpret it as Isis-Ra-El, three Aryan gods denoting the Aryan majority, the Ten Tribes of the twelve. The Christians don't realize they are reading esoteric political messaging from a chronicle of a race war.

(I think your interpretation is more subtle, a valuable teaching moment to explore, thank you. My maternal line are conversos who came over from Germany to PA three years after the Thirty Years War, in 1651. We still have the land with our patriarch Einstein planted in its cemetary, some of the original "Pennsylvania Dutch".)

Expand full comment
messianicdruid's avatar

What do you know about archaix.com?

Expand full comment
Sunny's avatar

I wrote a piece on why Kamala lost.

I hope you enjoy. If so please forward to your friends and readers.

Sunny

https://substack.com/@rob13/note/c-76195536

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Sadly - I think a LOT of that crowd are just dyed-in-the-wool Dems and won't switch parties, as well as, they think that being Woke is "cool" and makes them seem younger and in touch.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Yep.

"Dyed-in-the-wool".

I have them in my family. They're set in their ways, but hey, at 73, so am I. By the time you're over 65, you know what you believe and you are commited to it. I know that I am.

Plus, these people aren't into alt-media; especially not internet sources. They think a credible news source is PBS and programs like Washington Week in Review. They are convinced that The New York Times is the final word. These are the people who still have subscriptions.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Oh they think PBS and NPR are the source of all truth - YEP. Those hushed, snobby English accents. That generation are suckers for them.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

I am a proud member of the generation that gave the world the Beatles, Bob Dylan, and Pink Floyd. It was easy to see in 2015 that NPR and PBS had joined that Satanic forces promoting nothing but Democrat propaganda, lies, and hate.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Hmmm. You should read David McGowan's Laurel Canyon series. Lots of those musical acts you loved came from the same satanic forces.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

THANK YOU, @The Real Mary Rose! That's the post I was looking for.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

I'm quite sure that none of the Beatles, Bob Dylan, or any member of Pink Floyd ever lived in Laurel Canyon. It is true that many of the California musicians have families in the military, but so did Kris Kristofferson

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Kris Kristofferson was also part of deep state and was involved in MK-ultra programming. Beatles didn't live in the U.S. so they wouldn't have been in Laurel Canyon but it is amazing how many '60s musical groups came out of Laurel Canyon and were part of the deep state with fathers who were high up in military intelligence. McGowan's book on Laurel Canyon is a real eye-opener. I'm a 70 y.o. boomer and not proud of the hippie movement. I grew up right next to Laurel Canyon in Hollywood Hills.

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

It touched our family there too, in the biggest way.

1960s L.A. had some deep and dark going on, all of it circling around a certain President...and all the little people around him started to get hurt, hurt bad. I was quite small, but I do remember the things that happened.

My story starts with the story of Mac and Fitz, two Irish dads who served in the Pacific and liked to joke about poontang. Mac and Fitz...they got along. Then, something happened to Fitz.

Expand full comment
Mr. No's avatar

He was also a Rhodes Scholar. a most unusual background for a rocker. What kind of person with that level of education chooses that career path? Best guess: it was his assignment.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Yes, many Rhodes scholars are deep state. The man who started and sponsored it is deep state. Kris Kristofferson also came from a military family and was in the military - which numerous deep state people are. Most of those famous hippie musicians in Laurel Canyon in 1960s had a dad high up in military. M.I.C. (Military Industrial Complex) is a real thing, President Eisenhower warned us about it when he left office. There's a video of him giving that speech somewhere on You Tube. Fun fact: many years ago when I was a flight attendant I was leaving the airplane and saw him boarding the plane. He really gave me an intense, hungry stare, had deep blue eyes that were very penetrating. I wouldn't wanted to have been an MK-Ultra victim with him as the programmer.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

+1 @E. Grogan, In retrospect, the "hippie movement" was a brilliant psyop aimed at discrediting the vigilance needed to maintain Freedom.

"Passivity is fatal to us. Our goal is to make the enemy passive."

~ Mao Zedong

Sex and drugs and rock and roll were the pre-internet equivalent of China's “BGY” plan to control the world Blue (control the Internet), Gold (buy influence with money), and Yellow (seduce key people with sex).

Expand full comment
elysianfield's avatar

"n retrospect, the "hippie movement" was a brilliant psyop aimed at discrediting the vigilance needed to maintain Freedom."

Yes. This might explain our oft-criticized enthusiasm in dealing with them back in the 60's....

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

How was Kris Kristofferson involved in MK-ultra?

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Programmer.

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

Same here except I don't feel the same about the hippies, they were not all cut out of the same cloth. I haven't read McGowan's book but I'm well aware of everything in it. The music and the talent behind it was undeniable. Jim Morrison repeatedly disowned his parents by saying they had died. I don't consider most of the music then as subversive, they were mostly truth seekers trying to subvert the lying assassination govt we had inherited. Then came the backlash aka Manson and the Rap Industry. Kris K was a pos, ask Cathy O'Brien.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Many of those musicians didn't sing on the albums released of their music - they had other singers/musicians on the albums, that's in the Laurel Canyon book. Nor do these musicians come across as good, innocent folks either. Just for one, they knew something was going on with Manson and many of them had known him but they all refused to talk.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

The point is - and you'd see this if you read it - and it's available as an article online, not a whole book - is that this was not an organic, grass-roots music revolution. It was completely engineered, along with the entire culture. I get it though, it's too much for most people to be able to take in. But its purpose was to break up the American family unit, and it did that quite well. It set youth against parents from then on.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Hedonism is inherently subversive since it invokes the Government to come in and pick up the pieces. Morrison was doing the Will of the Deep State whether he knew it or not. Adolescents always do.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

OK then. Look up Tavistock's involvement in creating the Beatles. Just for chuckles.

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

Been there, seen it. Doesn't diminish the music or their talent. I also believe OG Paul was gone in '66.

Expand full comment
Thurston Thistlethwaite III's avatar

Paul died, creatively speaking, with the production and release of "Silly Love Songs" in 1976.

The death knell heard round the world.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

Plato wrote that the introduction of a new from of music was a very big deal - one that could destroy a culture. Rock is the music of impulse and sexuality. Dionysius unbound. Our culture was Apollonian, but that dying now because of Rock and its successors, Rap and Hip Hop. They're even beginning to integrate Country. We're not even allowed to have our own Dionysian culture, be it traditional or new. Rock didn't die - it was simply replaced.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

I just don't believe that a group of uneducated teenagers into hanging out in taverns could write 200+ brilliant songs in the space of a couple of years. But that's me.

Expand full comment
Lugh's avatar

The current Paul is an imposter? They replaced Sister Lucia too.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

Pretty sure the Beatles were a beta test of mass cultural manipulation. The late Quincy Jones said words to the effect that they weren't musicians, before retracting his statement.

The WHO were way WAY ***WAY*** better.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Nailed it. Bob Dylan admitted he sold his soul to the devil.

Whoops.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Yes - I'm of that generation, too, and saw that myself long ago.

Expand full comment
Mr. No's avatar

I'm a member of that same generation and remember when NPR turned cutesy with the introduction of "All Things Considered" in the late '70's. I stopped listening after that but still believed in PBS. Then in 2003, quite by chance, I stumbled across alt-media. It was nearly all micro-radio and shortwave back then (World Wide Christian Radio, a vast shortwave operation based in Nashville TN, carried many of the programs). But it didn't take off until years later with the Internet, and now X, and many have yet to catch up.

I was already 60-ish and set in my ways but not too set to recognize the truth when it smacks me upside the head.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Not all of us are. I'm 70 y.o. and know many my age who are conservatives and Trump supporters. Depends on where part of the country you live in. I live in the South where most folks are conservative. In 2020, my county voted 96% for Trump and we have many people my age here.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Absolutely. I think we're talking more about the loudest mouths, and the ones that rose to the top of the money chain. They tend to be libs.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

+1 If they're PBS and *ew York Times fans, they're probably multiply jabbed and boosted =D

*wheeling in the sky*

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

👎🤢🤮 I myself can't find who I was responding to here bc they play musical comments. 👎

Expand full comment
Emily Terrell's avatar

That’s definitely the case for my parents (77 and 78). They’ve been playing the cool kids all their lives. My mother refers to herself as Betty Dancer. When my step-dad’s middle child decided in his 40s to fly to Thailand and become a ‘woman’ my parents were beside themselves with joy. They’re social cache with their crowd went thru the roof. It was like that Harry Potter scene “we have a witch in the family!”

That reference puts me in an unfavorable light. I’m ok with that. If Kevin wants to live as a person called Vivian that’s fine. He’s not a woman but whatever. Vivian just ran for a CO state senate position and lost. But the campaign picture showed a happy smile.

My sister married a man who at the time was considering transitioning. He put that aside for a while and tried. Didn’t work. He eventually decided he really needed to live as a woman. I hear my former BIL married a biological woman and is also happy, though with a very different personality.

My sister rabidly defends both his choice and her support of it. She’s quite preachy about the issue. And she’s been alone and desperately lonely with her liberal orthodoxy ever since. She seems righteously outraged a lot. And so rigid she disallows any discussion that might lead to a politics or religion. She changes the subject or begins spouting whatever’s allowed in the permission structure of her thought bubble on the given day. She’s my sis and she’s lonely so I just smile.

None of them understand why I’d worship Jesus or vote Trump. They wonder how I managed to wander so far off the reservation. But they all seem to appreciate my ability to love them with compassion. I have a deep sense of peace grounded in living a life of simple faith here in reality. I wish them (and everyone) that simple peace and fulfillment.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Bless you for sticking to your guns and being who you are. I find most liberals to be miserable, because they are stuck in an impossibly grotesque mindset. No trans-widow is "happy" for them. They are told they have to be or they are a terrible person. I will guarantee that the vast majority of trans widows are heavily codependent. Trans widows who recovered or escaped, etc. have spoken on shows I watch, and it's pretty heartbreaking what they go through. First of all, TIMs (trans identified males who play at being women) are most often autogynophiles and/or narcissists, so while they are transing they torture their female partners emotionally and mentally like nobody's business. Then they leave them and the woman is supposed to understand.

I would give that asshole the heave-ho and never talk to him again. I mean, really? Why would any woman entertain this idiotic delusion? But they do. Whatever. I am hoping this presidency spells the end to some of the damage the LGBTQ++++++++ "community" were able to do.

Expand full comment
Cheryl's avatar

My mil was one of them and my father’s side of the family. All of them. Of course they are highly educated professionals. I’m the black sheep as my father was. He was a republican in a sea of liberal commie democrats. I’m not being facetious and they all live in California, Massachusetts or New Mexico.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

"I’m the black sheep"

You gotta be an outsider to see what's really up.

Expand full comment
Miss Rodeo's avatar

My mamma (1914-2005) didn’t dull the lead on one pencil all the years she voted. She was a Yellow Dog Democrat and proud of it. “I only keep living to cancel your vote,” she told me. Progressive meant something else for her, but had she lived, even she would have been disgusted by their bullshit.

Expand full comment
Sardaukar's avatar

Bingo Gringo!

Expand full comment
Men's Media Network's avatar

Deceptive demographic stat. The 65+ age group has the highest concentration of AWFLs. You can't simply assume "It's the boomers again."

Expand full comment
Thurston Thistlethwaite III's avatar

American Women's Football League???

Expand full comment
Yirgach's avatar

Affluent, White, Female, Liberal AKA Karen

Expand full comment
Abbybwood's avatar

I think some of this goes to the Mass Formation cult-like behavior that occurred during Covid.

I am a 74 y/o white, college educated female and a former Democrat. I even ran for Congress in 1992 against the corporatist Jane Harman (came in 3rd out of 7).

I was a proud Democrat associated with the Paul Wellstone crowd. Then Bill Clinton opened my eyes to the Deep State and by the time 9/11 happened I felt politically homeless.

Then in 2007 I worked for Ron Paul for president while living in Conn. Obama suckered me in because I believed he would give us Medicare for All. When I realized what a snake he was and saw the Neocon shenanigans of Hillary and Co. I swung to Trump and stayed.

But back to the cultish behavior. Even here in deep blue Los Angeles (also being a retired RN helped) I saw right through the Covid BS from the beginning. I wouldn’t be “going along to get along” with any of it even though my UCLA doctor begged me to get jabbed.

So, for me, this election seemed to fall into two general categories: the “woke” cult believing everything the MSM was saying, and those of us who were questioning authority and were not drinking their bullshit Koolaid.

The non-woke won and at my age I am extremely thankful for this.

Expand full comment
Yirgach's avatar

Abby, congrats on your break out!

Have you considered starting an AWFLs Anonymous support group?

Could be fun!

I'm surprised that so many with a medical background went along with the Covid jab BS. Maybe they didn't realize what an EUA drug label means?

Expand full comment
Alzaebo's avatar

We Boomers learned what our Greatest/Silent parents taught us.

We were kids in school during the Civil Rights Cultural Revolution.

Expand full comment
Miriamnae's avatar

I watched this in my own little subset—my aunts—and believe this is the crowd who still watches the News Hour…from Cronkite days.

Expand full comment
Paul B, Cohen's avatar

That reminds me - no more public funding or airwave subsidies to PBS and other propaganda outlets. Now’s the time to put an end to that monkey business.

Expand full comment
A.M.'s avatar

Said the same to my brother two days ago. We were riffing about what needs defending. It is a long list!

Expand full comment
RevMikeyMac's avatar

This 100%!!!

Expand full comment
Cheryl's avatar

They don’t realize how the democrat party has changed

Expand full comment
Carolyn’s Rae Of Sunshine's avatar

That or...perhaps a lot of the 65+ crowd were eliminated with Covid and the jabs over the last 4 years.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

It is ironic that Trump never said anything about ending Social Security; yet the Kamala crowd ate this lie up like it was candy.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

What Trump did say is that he will CONTINUE Social Security; yet somehow these people never heard that. Makes me wonder where they get their news from?

Expand full comment
Cheryl's avatar

And that would be truly amazing because they are old enough to have heard that talking point during every election cycle and nothing ever came of it

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

This isn't true for people I know including myself.

Expand full comment
Sedgwick C. Hartung's avatar

@Aelred A. You're shittin' me; how disappointing.

Apparently, there IS such a thing as living too long, rotting like a fallen mango enveloped in fruit flies, gutted by maggots on one's underside.

Happily, perhaps it's jab-related neurodegeneration =D

Expand full comment