If we consider the energy-resource angle at that link, we may conclude, or at least strongly suspect, that the religious/historical angle is a bit of a red herring, that Israel is a bit of a color-revolution backdoor to the region's energy resources, and that if there were no energy resources in the …
If we consider the energy-resource angle at that link, we may conclude, or at least strongly suspect, that the religious/historical angle is a bit of a red herring, that Israel is a bit of a color-revolution backdoor to the region's energy resources, and that if there were no energy resources in the region, the religious angle would be a bit of a backwater issue hardly bothered with, if at all, and left to the locals to sort out.
Personally, I'd be surprised if Israel wasn't seeing its last days, at least as it is now or appears to be going. Why? Because if it's a backdoor to the region's energy resources, other increasingly-powerful countries combined-- say, BRICS+-- want access to them as well.
Everyone probably doesn't want too much of a war over there to break out because it might mean the destruction of the energy infrastructure, which of course would defeat the purpose of a 'hot' war.
So it appears that they will be 'beating around the bush' asymmetrially-- an assassinated/installed leader here, a few bombed civilians there...
See also here:
kunstler.com/p/judgepocalypse-now/comment/102333416
If we consider the energy-resource angle at that link, we may conclude, or at least strongly suspect, that the religious/historical angle is a bit of a red herring, that Israel is a bit of a color-revolution backdoor to the region's energy resources, and that if there were no energy resources in the region, the religious angle would be a bit of a backwater issue hardly bothered with, if at all, and left to the locals to sort out.
Personally, I'd be surprised if Israel wasn't seeing its last days, at least as it is now or appears to be going. Why? Because if it's a backdoor to the region's energy resources, other increasingly-powerful countries combined-- say, BRICS+-- want access to them as well.
Everyone probably doesn't want too much of a war over there to break out because it might mean the destruction of the energy infrastructure, which of course would defeat the purpose of a 'hot' war.
So it appears that they will be 'beating around the bush' asymmetrially-- an assassinated/installed leader here, a few bombed civilians there...